cover
Contact Name
Kuni Nasihatun Arifah
Contact Email
kuninasihatun@unimugo.ac.id
Phone
+6289652989209
Journal Mail Official
kuninasihatun@unimugo.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Yos Sudarso No. 161 Gombong Kebumen
Location
Kab. kebumen,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jatijajar Law Review
ISSN : 28291069     EISSN : 28289161     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal bersifat terbuka untuk tulisan-tulisan di dalam bidang ilmu hukum dengan kerangka hukum humanis yang mengedepankan nilai dalam masyarakat, di berbagai sector ilmu hukum yakni Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Criminal Law, Privat Law, Business and economic law, Civil Law, Islamic Law, Environmental Law, Human Rights, International Law, Intellectual Property Law dan berbagai penelitian hukum lainnya.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 20 Documents
IMPEACHMENT SEBAGAI BENTUK PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PRESIDEN INDONESIA DALAM NEGARA HUKUM YANG DEMOKRATIS Adam Setiawan; Nehru Asyikin; Fatma Hidayati; Isnawati Isnawati
JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 2, No 2 (2023): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26753/jlr.v2i2.1161

Abstract

Based on the history of Indonesian state administration, there are two cases of impeachment that have occurred against active Presidents, namely President Soekarno and President Abdurrahman Wahid. However, it needs to be understood that the impeachment process is not as easy as the previous experience because it has been rigidly regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The purpose of this research is to comprehensively explore the impeachment process as a form of Presidential accountability in a democratic state of law. This research is a doctrinal research, using a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. The results showed that impeachment as the President's responsibility contains two patterns, namely political and legal mechanisms. The political mechanism is when the President is demanded accountability by the DPR which is then submitted to the MPR, (a joint session between DPR and DPD) then the Constitutional Court examines, hears and decides. as for the involvement of the Constitutional Court as a form of legal mechanism. Political and legal mechanisms in the impeachment process involving the role of DPR, MPR (filled with members of DPR and DPD), and the Constitutional Court is a manifestation of the principle of checks and balances. The final result of the institution that decides the impeachment of the President and / or Vice President if proven guilty is the MPR, as a form of accountability to the people through its representatives in the MPR which contains representation of the people (DPR) and representation of groups in the region (DPD) by not also leaving the principle of the rule of law as reflected in the role of the Constitutional Court in examining, adjudicating, and deciding.
ANALISIS PERJANJIAN KERJA WAKTU TERTENTU DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PADA PT. TELMARK INTEGRASI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA KERJA Wisu vorizato Harita; Wahyu Adi Mudiparwanto
JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 2, No 1 (2023): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26753/jlr.v2i1.1014

Abstract

Many companies use a Specific Time Work Agreement (PKWT) system for their workers to streamline expenses. However, in practice, it is not uncommon to encounter violations that are not in accordance with Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation. This study uses a normative-empirical method with data collection techniques in the form of literature studies that have been studied legally by secondary, tertiary, and analyzed by means of a qualitative approach. Based on the research results, the authors found a discrepancy between PT. Telmark Integration Indonesia in the implementation of PKWT in Article 81 number 14 and Article 81 number 15 on Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation, namely a probationary period for workers. Furthermore, the authors found that PT. Telmark Integrasi Indonesia in providing legal protection has not all been implemented in accordance with the legislation Article 156 number 44 on Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation in which the company only gives workers rights starting from the remaining working period of the worker. Legal remedies that can be taken by workers are holding deliberations or called bipartite up to reporting to relevant agencies according to what is regulated in Article 3 on Law No. 2 of 2004 on Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes.
Analysis Of Criminal Decisions In The Pinangki Sirna Malasari Corruption Case In Terms Of The Principle Of Justice Teddy Prayoga
JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 1, No 2 (2022): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26753/jlr.v1i2.756

Abstract

In imposing a criminal decision, the judge must really understand whether the decision handed down has reached the target for the purpose of sentencing. The judge's decision is the culmination of a case that is decided and tried by the judge. The criminal system according to positive law, judges have the freedom to determine the severity of the crime to be imposed on the defendant between the general minimum to the special maximum. In 2020, Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2020 concerning Guidelines for Criminalization Articles 2 and 3 of the Law on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes was established, which regulates the range of sentencing based on clarification of punishment covering state losses, aspects of error, aspects of impact, and aspects of the defendant's guilt. Therefore, judges as the spearhead of justice need to accommodate these fundamental values.The purpose of this paper is to examine the decisions of the Jakarta District Court Number 38/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/PN Jkt.Pst and the Jakarta High Court Number 10/PID.TPK/2021/PT DKI in the decision-making process whether they are in accordance with the principles of justice in decision making. The writing method used in this study uses a normative juridical approach, the primary data needed are the Criminal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Law Number 31 of 1999 which has been amended by Law Number 20 of 1999. 2001 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption, Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2020 concerning Guidelines for Criminalizing Article 2 and Article 3 of the Law on the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption, Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number 38/PID.SUS-TPK/2020/PN JKT.PST , and the Decision of the Jakarta High Court Number 10/PID.SUS-TPK/2021/PT DKI, the secondary data needed are textbooks related to judges' considerations in sentencing, research results, works from legal circles, magazines, Newspapers, internet, and others related to the problem to be researched. The entire data was obtained by means of literature study and then analyzed using the theory of justice.Based on the results of this study, it shows that the basis for legal considerations by the judge in the decision of the Pinangki Prosecutor at the District Court is not in accordance with the theory of justice, while at the High Court it cannot be said to be correct. This can be seen in the judges' considerations that have not accommodated the values of certainty, justice and also the benefits of the law itself. Moreover, the High Court did not show the severity of the crime, instead it reduced the sentence. Whereas the suspect's status as a law enforcer or a prosecutor who should not violate a special obligation of office. Therefore, the judge in making his decision must be careful, avoiding as little as possible inaccuracies in every decision making.
Pembatasan Import Sampah Sebagai Komitmen Indonesia Dalam Upaya Penanganan Perubahan Iklim Global Prabowo Sulistio; Sri Rahmi Syahruddin
JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 3, No 1 (2024): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26753/jlr.v3i1.1281

Abstract

Indonesia is the second largest producer and contributor of waste in the world, both organic waste and plastic waste. Plastic waste has always been a major problem in environmental pollution, both land and sea pollution. Based on UN Comtrade data, in 2022 Indonesia has imported plastic waste as much as 30.4 million US Dollars with a volume of 53.76 million kilograms with the countries that export the most plastic waste to Indonesia are the Netherlands, Germany and Slovenia. In addition to the problem of unpreparedness in domestic waste processing, Indonesia also faces the problem of the large inflow of illegal waste which of course further burdens the burden of domestic waste processing. Waste, which is a source of pollution, is also one of several sources of greenhouse gases in the increasingly worrying problem of climate change, which then encourages research to find the right solution and handling strategy. The author in this paper uses descriptive qualitative methods. The strong commitment of the government in enforcing regulations and all stakeholders in waste management is the key to long-term environmental improvement.
Perlindungan Hukum Dalam Kontrak Kerjasama Industri Ritel Antara Distributor dan Agen Distributor (Studi Kasus : Perjanjian Kontrak Antara PT. A dan CV. B) Michael Tjoandra; Zulfikar Judge
JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 2, No 2 (2023): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26753/jlr.v2i2.1157

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis mekanisme dan perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak dalam kontrak kerjasama industri ritel antara produsen dan agen distributor. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum yuridis normatif atau penelitian kepustakaan. Kajian pustaka ini menggunakan berbagai data sekunder seperti bahan hukum primer. Hasil kajian menemukan bahwa mekanisme kontrak kerjasama industri ritel antara produsen dan agen distributor dituangkan dan ditandatangani bersama dalam Perjanjian Keagenan Nomor: JKT/MICPG/128/2016, dibuat di Jakarta pada tanggal 20 Januari 2016. Perlindungan hukum bagi pihak yang dirugikan oleh kontrak kerja sama industri ritel antara produsen dan agen distributor berdasarkan Perjanjian Keagenan. Sebagai bentuk perlindungan hukum, pihak yang dirugikan dapat mengajukan gugatan ke Pengadilan Negeri, dimana dalam putusan tersebut tergugat harus mengembalikan pinjaman modal usaha kepada penggugat sebesar Rp. 460.000.000,- (empat ratus enam puluh juta rupiah) secara tunai dan segera. Adanya putusan tersebut menggambarkan bahwa terdakwa tidak mendapat perlindungan hukum, karena berdasarkan fakta-fakta di persidangan, terdakwa tidak wanprestasi.
Kerjasama Pertahanan sebagai Bagian Diplomasi Pertahanan: Pertimbangan, Tujuan, Prinsip, dan Ruang Lingkup Endro Tri Susdarwono
JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 1, No 2 (2022): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26753/jlr.v1i2.878

Abstract

This study aims to provide an overview of defense cooperation as part of defense diplomacy in order to improve a country's military capability by looking at the considerations, objectives, principles, and scope. The type of research used is explanative research, while the type of data used in this study is secondary data. The data collection technique used in this research is library research by finding and collecting secondary data through scientific books related to the subject matter discussed. In addition, articles from the internet were collected to support the data in completing this research. The data analysis technique used was a qualitative content analysis data analysis technique, namely the author analyzed secondary data, then used theory to explain a phenomenon or event that the author studied. Defense cooperation is an international transaction carried out by two or more countries for a specific purpose, namely the "national interest" of cooperating countries, using a treaty or in writing and formally. This cooperation is very sensitive and will involve state sovereignty, security, stability, and people's welfare.
Kedudukan Rasio Decidendi Hakim Dalam Pemenuhan Hak Restitusi Kepada Korban kejahatan Seksual pada Anak Deni Setiyawan; Muhammad Ramli; Noor Rahmad
JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 1, No 1 (2022): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26753/jlr.v1i1.729

Abstract

Children grow and develop in their lives cannot be separated from social and environmental influences in which they live and grow. We often see children who are victims of sexual crimes, especially crimes of rape. Even though protection for children has been regulated in Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection (Child Protection Law) and Government Regulation Number 43 of 2017 concerning the Implementation of Restitution for Children Who Become Victims of Crime. However, crimes against children continue to occur and pay more attention to that the law does not explain the amount of compensation for victims of sexual crimes, in this case a child. Seeing this problem, the judge must prioritize the fulfillment of the rights of the child as a victim in his decision. Because judges have an important role in determining the rights of victims through legal analysis, (ratio decidendi). This study aims to describe the position of the Judge's Decidendi Ratio in Fulfilling the Right of Restitution to Victims of Sexual Crimes in Children. The concentration of this research discusses the position of Government Regulation Number 43 of 2017 concerning the Implementation of Restitution for Children Who Become Victims of Crime in determining the amount of restitution, then the role of the position of judges who have the right of the ratio decidendi in determining the amount of compensation for victims by prioritizing justice to victims. . This study uses a normative method with a normative juridical approach. The results obtained: first, the position of Government Regulation Number 43 of 2017 concerning the Implementation of Restitution for Children Who Become Victims of Crime in determining the amount of restitution. Second, the role of the judge who has the right of the ratio decidendi in determining the amount of compensation for the victim by prioritizing justice to the victim.
SANKSI PIDANA BAGI PEMILIK APOTEK TERHADAP PENJUALAN OBAT DAFTAR G SECARA ILEGAL Dewi Purwaningsih; Anggita Atika Widiastuti
JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 2, No 2 (2023): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26753/jlr.v2i2.1216

Abstract

The illegal sale of G-list drugs by pharmacy owners is a practice that violates the law and has the potential to endanger public health. This study aims to analyze the role of criminal witnesses and the challenges faced by law enforcers in prosecuting pharmacies selling illegal G-list drugs. The research method used is document analysis and interviews with related parties. The results of the study show that criminal witnesses play an important role in disclosing facts related to the illegal sale of List G drugs. Their testimony is vital evidence in the law enforcement process to bring perpetrators to justice. However, the process of providing testimony at trial faced several challenges, including threats to witness safety, intimidation, and harassment that could affect the integrity of testimony.
PERKEMBANGAN PELAKSANAAN PENERBITAN IZIN USAHA MELALUI SISTEM ONLINE SINGLE SUBMISSION (OSS) Ade Gunawan; Wahyu Adi Mudiparwanto
JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 2, No 1 (2023): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26753/jlr.v2i1.1045

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out and provide an overview implementation issuance of business licenses through of the Online Single Submission System (OSS), as well as researching and reviewing developments regarding the Online Single Submission System (OSS).The Enterpenuer in carrying out business activities require a business license. After the Online Single Submission System (OSS) comes into applied, Enterpenuer in applying for business licenses online by accessing the Online Single Submission System (OSS). When a business license has been issued from the OSS system, entrepeneur must do procedure of “komitmen izin usaha” for business licenses. The entrepeneurs consider the issuance of business licenses only enough through the OSS system, and they don’t know that there are other procedures after that. That is what causes do not take care of their “komitmen izin usaha”. To overcome thats problems, The Central Government is developing an Online Single Submission (OSS) System, by changing to a risk-based business permit system on Online Single Submission (OSS) System. Therefore, There are several problems that need to be studied and researched, namely how far is the understanding of business actors in terms of applying for business licenses through the Online Single Submission (OSS) System, as well as how the development of changes in the Online Single Submission (OSS) System. This study uses an empirical juridical approach to find out the results of the research. has been processed in detail into the form of descriptive sentences.
Polemik OMNIBUSLAW: Izin & Pengadaan Tanah Terhadap Resiko Bencana Kerusakan Lingkungan Wadas, Kecamatan Bener, Kabupaten Purworejo Peggy Dian Septi Nur Angraini
JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 1, No 2 (2022): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26753/jlr.v1i2.767

Abstract

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Lapangan Kerja disusun dengan menggunakan pendekatan Omnibuslaw. Berbagai masalah konflik agraria yang terjadi di Indonesia adalah penolakan masyarakat dalam aspek lingkungan terkait peristiwa yang terjadi di Desa Wadas, Kecamatan Bener, Kabupaten Purworejo. Tujuan dari makalah ini adalah untuk mengetahui ruang lingkup pengaturan izin dan pembebasan lahan untuk pembangunan Bendungan Benar di Desa Wadas, Kecamatan Bener, Kabupaten Purworejo dan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja yang mengakibatkan risiko bencana bagi pertambangan di Desa Wadas, Kecamatan Bener, Kabupaten Purworejo. .Metode yang digunakan dalam makalah ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif menggunakan pendekatan hukum, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus.Hasil penulisan menunjukkan bahwa Bendungan Bener sebagai Proyek Strategis Nasional (PSN) ditetapkan melalui Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 56 Tahun 2018 tentang Percepatan Pelaksanaan Proyek Strategis Nasional (PSN). Keputusan Gubernur Jawa Tengah Nomor 590/41/2018, Nomor 539/29/2020, dan Nomor 590/20/2021 ditetapkan Tentang Persetujuan Penetapan Lokasi Pengadaan Tanah. Peraturan kebijakan perizinan lingkungan hidup untuk kegiatan usaha pertambangan andesit untuk pembangunan Bendungan Bener di Kabupaten Puworejo: 1). Penyederhanaan perizinan: Pasal 1 angka 35 Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup diubah menjadi persetujuan lingkungan atas Undang-Undang 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja. 2). Amdal: UU 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Lapangan Kerja Pembuatan Amdal sebagai uji kelayakan dan perizinan usaha mengakibatkan peran masyarakat terbatas, seperti peran pemerhati lingkungan dan organisasi lingkungan (LINGKUNGAN). 3) Undang-Undang Kebijakan Pengadaan Tanah Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Lapangan Kerja diatur dalam bentuk Peraturan Pemerintah tentang Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Untuk Pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum. Dengan demikian merevisi Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah untuk Pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum. Kemudian sentralisasi kewenangan dan kemudahan Proyek Strategis Nasional (PSN) dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja berpotensi berdampak pada peningkatan risiko dan kerentanan. Perizinan dan pembebasan lahan justru menyebabkan penyusutan ruang hidup dan mengundang konflik dan kriminalisasi warga yang mempertahankan ruang hidupnya.Kata kunci: Omnibus Law; Izin; Pembebasan Lahan; Risiko Bencana Kerusakan Lingkungan; Desa Wadas.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 20