cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Kuni Nasihatun Arifah
Contact Email
kuninasihatun@unimugo.ac.id
Phone
+6289652989209
Journal Mail Official
kuninasihatun@unimugo.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Yos Sudarso No. 161 Gombong Kebumen
Location
Kab. kebumen,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jatijajar Law Review
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong
ISSN : 28291069     EISSN : 28289161     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal bersifat terbuka untuk tulisan-tulisan di dalam bidang ilmu hukum dengan kerangka hukum humanis yang mengedepankan nilai dalam masyarakat, di berbagai sector ilmu hukum yakni Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Criminal Law, Privat Law, Business and economic law, Civil Law, Islamic Law, Environmental Law, Human Rights, International Law, Intellectual Property Law dan berbagai penelitian hukum lainnya.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 3 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2, No 2 (2023): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW" : 3 Documents clear
Impeachment Sebagai Bentuk Pertanggungjawaban Presiden Indonesia Dalam Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis Setiawan, Adam; Asyikin, Nehru; Hidayati, Fatma; Isnawati, Isnawati
JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 2, No 2 (2023): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26753/jlr.v2i2.1161

Abstract

Based on the history of Indonesian state administration, there are two cases of impeachment that have occurred against active Presidents, namely President Soekarno and President Abdurrahman Wahid. However, it needs to be understood that the impeachment process is not as easy as the previous experience because it has been rigidly regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The purpose of this research is to comprehensively explore the impeachment process as a form of Presidential accountability in a democratic state of law. This research is a doctrinal research, using a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. The results showed that impeachment as the President's responsibility contains two patterns, namely political and legal mechanisms. The political mechanism is when the President is demanded accountability by the DPR which is then submitted to the MPR, (a joint session between DPR and DPD) then the Constitutional Court examines, hears and decides. as for the involvement of the Constitutional Court as a form of legal mechanism. Political and legal mechanisms in the impeachment process involving the role of DPR, MPR (filled with members of DPR and DPD), and the Constitutional Court is a manifestation of the principle of checks and balances. The final result of the institution that decides the impeachment of the President and / or Vice President if proven guilty is the MPR, as a form of accountability to the people through its representatives in the MPR which contains representation of the people (DPR) and representation of groups in the region (DPD) by not also leaving the principle of the rule of law as reflected in the role of the Constitutional Court in examining, adjudicating, and deciding.
Perlindungan Hukum Dalam Kontrak Kerjasama Industri Ritel Antara Distributor dan Agen Distributor (Studi Kasus : Perjanjian Kontrak Antara PT. A dan CV. B) Michael Tjoandra; Zulfikar Judge
JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 2, No 2 (2023): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26753/jlr.v2i2.1157

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis mekanisme dan perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak dalam kontrak kerjasama industri ritel antara produsen dan agen distributor. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum yuridis normatif atau penelitian kepustakaan. Kajian pustaka ini menggunakan berbagai data sekunder seperti bahan hukum primer. Hasil kajian menemukan bahwa mekanisme kontrak kerjasama industri ritel antara produsen dan agen distributor dituangkan dan ditandatangani bersama dalam Perjanjian Keagenan Nomor: JKT/MICPG/128/2016, dibuat di Jakarta pada tanggal 20 Januari 2016. Perlindungan hukum bagi pihak yang dirugikan oleh kontrak kerja sama industri ritel antara produsen dan agen distributor berdasarkan Perjanjian Keagenan. Sebagai bentuk perlindungan hukum, pihak yang dirugikan dapat mengajukan gugatan ke Pengadilan Negeri, dimana dalam putusan tersebut tergugat harus mengembalikan pinjaman modal usaha kepada penggugat sebesar Rp. 460.000.000,- (empat ratus enam puluh juta rupiah) secara tunai dan segera. Adanya putusan tersebut menggambarkan bahwa terdakwa tidak mendapat perlindungan hukum, karena berdasarkan fakta-fakta di persidangan, terdakwa tidak wanprestasi.
Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pemilik Apotek Terhadap Penjualan Obat Daftar G Secara Ilegal Purwaningsih, Dewi; Widiastuti, Anggita Atika
JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 2, No 2 (2023): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26753/jlr.v2i2.1216

Abstract

The illegal sale of G-list drugs by pharmacy owners is a practice that violates the law and has the potential to endanger public health. This study aims to analyze the role of criminal witnesses and the challenges faced by law enforcers in prosecuting pharmacies selling illegal G-list drugs. The research method used is document analysis and interviews with related parties. The results of the study show that criminal witnesses play an important role in disclosing facts related to the illegal sale of List G drugs. Their testimony is vital evidence in the law enforcement process to bring perpetrators to justice. However, the process of providing testimony at trial faced several challenges, including threats to witness safety, intimidation, and harassment that could affect the integrity of testimony.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 3

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 3, No 1 (2024): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 2, No 2 (2023): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 2, No 1 (2023): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 1, No 2 (2022): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 1, No 1 (2022): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW