cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Brawijaya Law Journal
Published by Universitas Brawijaya
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
BRAWIJAYA LAW JOURNAL, Journal of Legal Studies Brawijaya Law Journal (BLJ) is a newly established journal in the field of legal studies. The Journal is published annually by Law Faculty Brawijaya University, Indonesia. BLJ is an open access, peer-reviewed e-journal which aims to offer an international scientific platform for national as well as cross-border legal research. The materials published include major academic papers dealing critically with various aspects and field of laws as well as shorter papers such as recently published book review and notes on topical issues of law. Printed version of the series can be printed on demand (POD). The website of the journal can be accessed through lawjournal.ub.ac.id
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 2, No 1 (S) (2015): Contemporary Issues in South-East Asia Countries" : 6 Documents clear
COUNTER-TERRORISM IN INDONESIA Meliala, Jordan Sebastian
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (S) (2015): Contemporary Issues in South-East Asia Countries
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (971.865 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2015.002.01.05

Abstract

Since the incident of World Trade Center (WTC) in USA, Indonesia has become an easy target for the next terrorism. Counterterrorist campaigns can be undertaken by military and paramilitary forces. Counterterrorism refers to proactive policies that specifically seek to eliminate terrorist environments and groups, Regardless of which policy is selected, the ultimate goal of counterterrorism is clear: to save lives by proactively preventing or decreasing the number of terrorist attacks. But, so far the Government of Indonesia is only able to capture the terrorists but is unable to eradicate terrorism. Therefore, the government of Indonesia still needs a comprehensive ways to counter terrorism in Indonesia
ALIGNMENT OF MALAYSIA AND ASEAN AGREEMENTS ON ICT LAWS: A REVIEW Manap, Nazura Abdul
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (S) (2015): Contemporary Issues in South-East Asia Countries
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (345.872 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2015.002.01.01

Abstract

The mega Multimedia Super Corridor (MSC) project launched in 1996 is a strong endorsement of the Malaysian government’s commitment towards developing the ICT industry in Malaysia. To attract world-class technology companies and prepare the local ICT industry, the government has offered MSC Malaysia Status to companies developing or using multimedia technologies in producing and enhancing their products and services and locating in any of the 26 Cybercities and Cyber centres in Malaysia. MSC status confers incentives, rights and privileges under the MSC Malaysia Bill of Guarantees. This ICT initiative also underlies Malaysia’s commitment to lead the region in protecting intellectual property and adherence to cyber laws. As a member of E-ASEAN this assurance aligns with the e-ASEAN initiative “…to adopt electronic commerce regulatory and legislative frameworks that create trust and confidence for consumers and facilitate the transformation of businesses towards the development of e-ASEAN”. This paper identifies and analyses the extent of the Malaysian government’s compliance with e-ASEAN principles particularly in the legal and regulatory aspects.
PRESS FREEDOM IN SINGAPORE AND MALAYSIA: DEFAMATION Chapman, Georgia Kate
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (S) (2015): Contemporary Issues in South-East Asia Countries
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (281.588 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2015.002.01.02

Abstract

This paper focuses on the arguments around restriction on freedom of the press in the Strong States of Singapore and Malaysia. It assesses the presence of constraints on press freedoms in democratic western countries imposed by corporation rather than state and the similar effects that these constraints may have on bias present in publicly accessible news reporting. It argues that independence of the press does not just require protection from legal and executive regulation, but also protection from large media corporations and their political alignments. This report will assess the bias of reporting and news media publication that exists in Malaysia and Singapore due to legislative and regulatory constraints as opposed to bias that exist in the western liberal democratic nations of the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States of America (USA) due to Media Organisation control.
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION IN INDONESIA AND AUSTRALIA Partridge, Jodie
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (S) (2015): Contemporary Issues in South-East Asia Countries
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (354.374 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2015.002.01.03

Abstract

Freedom of Information laws promote access to data held by government authorities in the public sector to mainstream society. Such laws have been enacted on a global scale however the obedience they have attracted is not consistent amongst each geographical location. Freedom of Information Laws have been enacted in Indonesia, it was a scheme introduced in 2008 which included many different components that were to improve each individual’s right to communicate and obtain information for the purpose of developing themselves and their current political and social environment. The adequacy of the Freedom of Information is a questionable notion in the grand scheme of Indonesia’s legal environment as its effectiveness and motives are rather questionable. It has been acknowledged that this initiative is still developing on a national scale, which raises the main question, is 6 years long enough for a scheme to still be dubbed as ‘developing’? This text will analyse the advantageous and pitfalls of the legislative instrument ending with a comparative analysis with the current situation that Australia experiences.
GOVERNMENTAL CONTROL ON JURNALISTIC PRACTICE IN 'PSEUDO-DEMOCRATIC' MALAYSIA AND SINGAPORE OR BIG COMPANY CONTROL ON JOURNALISTIC PRACTICE IN 'ESTABLISHED-DEMOCRATIC' AUSTRALIA: WHICH IS WORSE AND WHERE ARE THE PARALLESL Sinclair, Elizabeth
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (S) (2015): Contemporary Issues in South-East Asia Countries
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (356.909 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2015.002.01.04

Abstract

Amanda Whiting and Timothy Marjoribanks argued in their chapter Media professional’s perceptions of defamation and other constraints upon news reporting in Malaysia and Singapore[1]that Malaysia and Singapore experience, due to a number of factors, restricted media freedom - many of these factors relating to the semi-democratic nature of Malaysian and Singaporean government.[1]Amanda Whiting and Timothy Marjoribanks, ‘Media Professionals' Perceptions of Defamation and other Constraints upon News Reporting in Malaysia and Singapore’ in Andrew Kenyon, Tim Marjoribanks, Amanda Whiting (eds.) Democracy, Media and Law in Malaysia and Singapore (Routledge, London, 2013), 129-156.
MODERN SLAVERY IN INDONESIA: BETWEEN NORMS AND IMPLEMENTATION Hardianti, Savira Dhanika
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (S) (2015): Contemporary Issues in South-East Asia Countries
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (346.318 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2015.002.01.06

Abstract

People now in the 21st century are still sold like objects, forced to work for little or no pay and at the complete mercy of their employers. The Global Slavery Index (GSI) 2013 shows that there are estimated 29.8 million people are living in a modern slavery. In Indonesia there are 210,970 people living in slavery. Although Indonesia has some laws regulating about modern slavery that is included in Anti-Trafficking Law. This paper tries to figure the norms and the implementations in modern slavery practice. How the norms are implemented by the government and what are the obstacles to enforce the law.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6


Filter by Year

2015 2015


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 8, No 2 (2021): State Administration Role in Establishing Constitutional Obligation Vol 8, No 1 (2021): Contemporary Issue in Private Law Vol 7, No 2 (2020): Contemporary Legal Issue in Children and Women Protection Vol 7, No 1 (2020): Contitutional Issues: Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Vol 6, No 2 (2019): State Regulations and Law Enforcement Vol 6, No 1 (2019): Alternative Dispute Resolution Vol 5, No 2 (2018): The Role of State in Contemporary Legal Development Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Culture and Technological Influence in Regulation Vol 5, No 2 (2018): The Role of State in Contemporary Legal Development Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Culture and Technological Influence in Regulation Vol 4, No 2 (2017): Law and Sustainable Development Vol 4, No 1 (2017): Constitutional Issues and Indigenous Rights Vol 4, No 2 (2017): Law and Sustainable Development Vol 4, No 1 (2017): Constitutional Issues and Indigenous Rights Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Contemporary Indigenous and Constitutional Issues: Transnational Perspective Vol 3, No 1 (2016): Law and Human Rights Issues Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Contemporary Indigenous and Constitutional Issues: Transnational Perspective Vol 3, No 1 (2016): Law and Human Rights Issues Vol 2, No 2 (2015): Law and Globalization Vol 2, No 1 (S) (2015): Contemporary Issues in South-East Asia Countries Vol 2, No 1 (S) (2015): Contemporary Issues in South-East Asia Countries Vol 1, No 1 (2014): Legal and Development Vol 1, No 1 (2014): Legal and Development More Issue