cover
Contact Name
Egi Sukma Baihaki
Contact Email
egisukma_baihaki@yahoo.com
Phone
+6281511960291
Journal Mail Official
kanzphilosophia@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Lebak Bulus II No. 2, RT 4/RW 4, Cilandak Barat, Cilandak, Jakarta Selatan, 12430, Indonesia
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism
ISSN : 24425451     EISSN : 24071056     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20871/kpjipm
Kanz Philosophia is a refereed academic journal published by Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra in Jakarta. The journal conscientiously aims to provide a scholarly platform for critical and informed articles, particularly in the field of Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism. Such issues arise out of classical and contemporary discussions from varied traditions, either Eastern or Western in the hope to contribute to the resolution of various theoretical, methodological, and practical issues in the aforementioned fields. It covers the following scopes and issues: Philosophy of Philosophy (Epistemology and Ontology); Philosophy of Humans; Philosophy of Language; Philosophy of Religion; Philosophy of Morals; Philosophy of History; Philosophy of Culture; Philosophy of Art; Philosophy of Politics; Philosophy of Sociology; Philosophy of Education; Philosophy of Science; Philosophy of Psychology; Theoretical and Practical Sufism
Articles 6 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 4 No. 2 (2014): December" : 6 Documents clear
SUHRAWARDI’S ONTOLOGY: FROM “ESSENCE-EXISTENCE” TO “LIGHT”: (A Suhrawardian Reply to Sadrian Critiques) Mohammad Syifa Amin Widigdo
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism Vol. 4 No. 2 (2014): December
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The distinction between essence (mahiyyah) and existence (wujūd) has been a consuming problem among philosophers, at least since al-Farabi and ibn Sina. It has become the starting point in reinterpretation of reality, whether objective or merely subjective, the problem of fundamentality (principal) and respectivality (mental conception) in the realms of ontology and epistemology which never been discussed specifically before. Suhrawardi is one of philosophers who tries to provide different interpretation and even critiques toward previous philosophers (especially ibn Sina) in this regard. Even though he supports ibn Sina’s point of view that there is distinction between essence and existence, but he also has his own conclusion in this case whichis formulated in his theory of “light”. This article tries to present the ideas of Suhrawardi on “essence and existence” and the theory of light. Here will be discussed also some critiques from Sadrian school and the answers to those critiques by Suhrawardian philosophers.
STUDI KRITIS TERHADAP TEORI IDENTITAS PIKIRAN-OTAK MARIO BUNGE: PERSPEKTIF NEO-SADRIAN Cipta Bakti Gama
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism Vol. 4 No. 2 (2014): December
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The aim of this research is to conduct a critical analysis of Mario Bunge’s view that mental reality is identical with the reality of brain function known as mind-brain identity theory. The analysis is performed using Neosadrian perspective, i.e. a new form of Mulla Sadra’s philosophy which is developed by Tabataba‘i and his disciples. The author tries to elucidate the main claims held by Bunge and to launch some critiques upon those claims. The main conclusions achieved through this research include the following. Firstly, mind-brain identity theory cannot be accepted. Secondly, current development of scientific studies corroborating certain relations between brain and mental states does not justify the validity of the identity theory, also does not falsify its opposition. Thirdly, a religious-sufistical philosophy, such the Neosadrian, can be consistent with current development of scientific research.
DUALISME PEMIKIRAN SUFISTIK IBN TAYMIYYAH Yunasril Ali
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism Vol. 4 No. 2 (2014): December
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Ibn Taymiyya, despite being well-kown as a figure of salafi-radicalists which are anti-reformism and oppose tasawuf, in fact is an inspiring figure for some modernist Muslims and is a sufi. How could it be possible for someone who criticizes tasawuf to be a sufi? How should Ibn Taymiyya be placed correctly in this regard? How could his contradictive attitude be explained? These questions will be discussed in paper through a careful study of his works and by investigating his life-experience from a psycho-sufistic perspective. This paper argues that his criticism to certain kind of tasawwuf, i.e., the naẓarī-falsafī, is often based on confusion in understanding terms and departs from different paradigm used by the object of his criticism. Finally this paper shows that the attitude he has, towards the end of his life—in an inwardly situated condition in such a manner so he is far from any discursive activities and totally drowning in the taqarruband having full attention to God and achieving the peak of mystical experience, the annihilation— however contradicts to his early standpoint, is nothing but the continuation and growth of his religious maturity.
KONSPIRASI MEDIA MASSA DAN PENGEMBALIAN BAHASA PADA HAKIKATNYA:: SEBUAH PENERAPAN METODE ANALISIS TINDAK TUTUR KOMUNIKASI Wahyu Wibowo
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism Vol. 4 No. 2 (2014): December
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The twenty-first century may be referred to as the century of language, considering how human life is inseparable from the various forms of mass media. However, concerning the construction of facts and reality, especially whenever mass-media becomes colored by ego-centric tendencies, biases in reporting frequently occur that raiseethical problems. It follows that there has been a conspiracy behind mass-mediathat has impact inobstructing the function of media as a forum for political education for the people. Therefore, in order to reveal the conspiracy a new media text analysis method --which in this paper is called speech-act analysis method of communication-- is required. The method is heuristically, critically and contextually brought about through contemporary principles of Ordinary Language Philosophy. Thereby, in addition asserting that mass communication should be used ethically and with emancipation, this method will also examine the other media text analysismethods which have been known but may not be useful to discover conspiracy behind mass-media reports.
IS OLODUMARE, GOD IN YORUBA BELIEF, GOD? Benson O. Igboin
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism Vol. 4 No. 2 (2014): December
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The question whether Olodumare, God in Yoruba belief, as Bolaji Idowu translated it, is God is a tortuous one. It is so because the concept of, and the belief in, Olodumare are undergoing circuitous strings of analysis that tempt one to answer the question in three fundamental episodic phases. The first came from the Western anthropologists who advertently or inadvertently ‘misconceived’ Olodumare, as completely less than a God; the second stage championed by foremost Africanist/ Yoruba theologians ‘promoted’ Olodumare to the ‘status’ of a God or rather insisted that Olodumare is God; while the decolonisation school is currently divesting Olodumare of so-called Hellenised garb of the second period, and casting ‘true’ images of him. Each of these ‘truths’ about Olodumare has serious ancillary questions that affect the overall understanding of Olodumare. This study interrogates the claims of three recent decolonisation philosophers, and reveals that their casting of Olodumare is inconsistent one with another. It concludes that before any incontrovertible concept of Olodumare could be reached, alternative translational (linguistic) equivalents true to the Yoruba theology and true to Christianity must be adopted; otherwise the questions raised might yet remain unanswered, while Idowu’s thesis still suffices
PEMIKIRAN FILOSOFIS SADRA DALAM TAFSĪR AL-QUR’ĀN AL- KARĪM : : SURAH AL-’A‘LĀ Kerwanto
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism Vol. 4 No. 2 (2014): December
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In his commentary on Surah al-’ A‘lā, Mulla Sadra, through his Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-Karīm invites our souls to ventureinto the deepest layers of meaning to recognize the reality of Divinity (almabdā’), prophethood (Ṣirāṭ or nubuwwah) and resurrection (ma‘ād) and discusses it in a more philosophical manner. This study is an attempt to explore the benefits of these important aspects of religious sources unearthed from Qur’anic injunctions combined with rational principles of philosophical and mystical experiences (intuitive) of Sadra. Each chapter in this commentary is assigned a title with tasbīḥ (glorification), while presenting various issues related to metaphysics of Qur’an.Thephilosophical principles used in the interpretation of this treatise could be a proof of harmony between philosophy and religious texts. This kind of interpretation accepts the literal meaning (ẓāhir) of lafaẓ al Qur’ān, and then with the aid of reason, intuition and revelation uncover the reality behind them; the search for the secrets behind the literal sense.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6