cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Egi Sukma Baihaki
Contact Email
egisukma_baihaki@yahoo.com
Phone
+6281511960291
Journal Mail Official
kanzphilosophia@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Lebak Bulus II No. 2, RT 4/RW 4, Cilandak Barat, Cilandak, Jakarta Selatan, 12430, Indonesia
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra
ISSN : 24425451     EISSN : 24071056     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20871/kpjipm
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Education, Social,
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences
Kanz Philosophia is a refereed academic journal published by Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra in Jakarta. The journal conscientiously aims to provide a scholarly platform for critical and informed articles, particularly in the field of Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism. Such issues arise out of classical and contemporary discussions from varied traditions, either Eastern or Western in the hope to contribute to the resolution of various theoretical, methodological, and practical issues in the aforementioned fields. It covers the following scopes and issues: Philosophy of Philosophy (Epistemology and Ontology); Philosophy of Humans; Philosophy of Language; Philosophy of Religion; Philosophy of Morals; Philosophy of History; Philosophy of Culture; Philosophy of Art; Philosophy of Politics; Philosophy of Sociology; Philosophy of Education; Philosophy of Science; Philosophy of Psychology; Theoretical and Practical Sufism
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Filsafat
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): June" : 5 Documents clear
Diri yang Pra-Deskriptif: (Studi Paralelisme Struktur Fundamental Manusia Dalam Filsafat Heidegger dan Mullā Şadrā) Refan Aditya
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): June
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20871/kpjipm.v7i1.97

Abstract

This study discusses the thoughts of two great philosophers namely Martin Heidegger and Mulla Ṣadrā in a study of Philosophy of Man in the topic of ‘Fundamental Structure of Man’. The problem discussed here is parallelism of the philosophers' ideas on the Fundamental Structure of Man. This study tries to figure out the nature of humans according to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger and Mullā Ṣadrā, and synthesizes them with the method of parallelism. The author feels that this research is important, not only to enrich the inter-philosophical dialogue, but also because these two philosophers share the same ontological principle in their philosophical foundation namely, Being. This view is called ontological reduction. Both were convinced that no philosophical problem could be solved unless the question of Being was adequately answered. The method used in this study is the particular comparative method, namely parallelism. From this research the author found that, Parallelism of the Fundamental Structure of Man according to Heidegger and Mulla Ṣadrā shows a criticism of the views that have taken root in the discourse of modern Western philosophy which was pioneered by Rene Descartes. Heidegger clearly shows his disagreement with the view of self in Cartesian philosophy and breaks it down with the idea of human Dasein as an existent who understands himself in a pre-structured understanding, existentially and precedes any reflection or any cognitive activity about I (self). Likewise Mullā Ṣadrā, who lived in the same century as Rene Descartes, indirectly criticized such philosophical traditions of rationalism by developing the idea of his ‘ilm hudhūrī, that this knowledge of I or self (self-knowledge) is immanent in itself (self-evident) and precede any form of conception or reflection about self and be the basis for every form of empirical knowledge.
NEGERI UTAMA DAN PERANNYA DALAM MERAIH KEBAHAGIAAN PERSPEKTIF AL-FARABI Alamsyah Kaharuddin Manu; Zainab Soraya
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): June
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20871/kpjipm.v7i1.98

Abstract

Happiness is an eternal theme that humans always talk about. Many philosophers talk about happiness, from the ancient Greeks to the times of Islamic philosophers. Al-Farābi, an early Muslim philosopher, offers an interesting view of happiness: Medina al-Fāḍilah as the basis for achieving happiness. Happiness is defined as the highest good that makes man detached from material nature and coexist with immaterial beings forever. The Main State which is likened to a body, has a leader who has achieved human perfection. It is through this leader that the people of Negeri Utama try to build their country together to achieve true happiness. By using the literature study method and researching the existing literature, it is concluded that al-Farabi's main state concept has an important role in the study of political philosophy. A country must have a goal of happiness and talking about the parent country will certainly discuss the concept of leadership, leadership patterns, and forms of the state.
Sebuah MELACAK MAKNA WORLDVIEW: STUDI KOMPARATIF WORLDVIEW BARAT, KRISTEN, DAN ISLAM: Indonesia Abdul Rohman; Ahmad Ahmad; Amir Reza; Muhammad Ari Firdausi
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): June
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20871/kpjipm.v7i1.147

Abstract

In this article, we will review the keyword Worldview and its meaning, both from the perspective of Western philosophers, Christian theologians, and Islamic scholars. Worldview is a view of life or philosophy of life that is owned by everyone. This article is a literature study where the data are taken from several books related to worldview. The authors apply qualitative methods with a descriptive-analytic approach in this study. The data that has been obtained and analyzed by the author will then be compared with each other. The results of this study are that Western philosophers, Christian theologians, and Islamic scholars have different views regarding the worldview triggered by differences in their epistemological sources. West and Christianity put reason as a source in determining worldview. So that the worldview of the West and Christianity is changing, because each person’s mind is different and can change. This is different from the meaning of worldview in Islam which comes from divine revelation. The Islamic worldview is absolute, because the divine revelations that are revealed are not the product of human reason, but are direct instructions from Allah. While the West and Christianity only discuss what is visible to the five senses.
PEMIKIRAN FILSAFAT POLITIK ABDOLKARIM SOROUSH Adi Bunardi
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): June
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20871/kpjipm.v7i1.134

Abstract

The ideas of freedom, justice, democracy, and secularism are the main themes in the study of political philosophy. In the context of religious and political relations, conversations about justice, democratic freedom, and political secularism are the main themes in the Islamic world. One of them is the debate on philosophical political thought that took place in Iran, after the revolution. The idea of ​​the relation between religion and politics, especially the relation between Islam and democracy which requires freedom and justice, has become an ongoing and ongoing philosophical political discourse. The main figure who became the vanguard in building religious and political relations based on freedom and justice was Abdolkarim Soroush. By using interpretive descriptive analysis and literature study coupled with a historical approach, this article attempts to explain Abdolkarim Soroush's view on the relationship between religion and politics, especially Islam and democracy with the themes of freedom, justice, secularism, and restricted democracy. The results obtained regarding the fundamental difference between political secularism and philosophical secularism according to Soroush are the roots and objectives. Soroush believes that political secularism is an alternative in solving the problem between religion and politics, both in religious societies and in non-religious or secular societies. Regarding democracy, Soroush views democracy as an anti-tyranny theory. As for justice, he considers justice to have roots in Islamic teachings and to be the basis of modern political life. In terms of freedom, Soroush views freedom as dynamic. Soroush divides the concept of freedom into political and philosophical, in the political dimension, freedom is identical with democracy.
FILSAFAT JIWA IKHWAN AL-SHAFA SEBAGAI BASIS KONSEP PENDIDIKAN Muhamad Rum
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): June
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20871/kpjipm.v7i1.135

Abstract

This study aims to refute the statement of materialists who tend to reject the existence of the soul as an important dimension for humans, especially those related to education. The background of the problem is that the flow of materialism states that physical reality is the ultimate and this group also rejects the existence of immaterial reality. In relation to physical education, it is the total role in the abstraction process. With education, it is intended to make humans better and able to improve the economy as well. In addition, the education of the bourgeoisie is referred to as a production process, that is, to produce knowledge, human beings that they can use in the life of capitalism. The purpose of this kind of education will reduce the meaning of education as a means to develop human abilities and potentials. Human spiritual potential will be forgotten and not important to be developed to the fullest. The method that the researcher uses in this study is a descriptive and analytical method with reference to the primary and secondary sources of Rasā'il Ikhwān al-Ṣafā related to this research. The conclusion of this study is that education cannot be separated from the immaterial aspect of the soul where all the potential contained in humans comes from the potential of the soul, besides that the soul is also the driving force of the body in carrying out each of its activities. Thus, it is the soul that is the basis of human education, not material-based.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): June Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): December Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): June Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): December Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): June Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): December Vol. 6 No. 1 (2016): Kanz Philosophia Vol. 5 No. 2 (2015): Kanz Philosophia Vol. 5 No. 1 (2015): June Vol. 4 No. 2 (2014): December Vol. 4 No. 1 (2014): June Vol. 3 No. 2 (2013): December Vol. 3 No. 1 (2013): June Vol. 2 No. 2 (2012): December Vol. 2 No. 1 (2012): June Vol. 1 No. 2 (2011): December Vol. 1 No. 1 (2011): August More Issue