cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 14117177     EISSN : 26156628     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy, Agriculture,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Economics, Econometrics & Finance
SOCA merupakan jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan berkala di bidang social-ekonomi pertanian dan agribisnis, diterbitkan dua kali setahun (Januari-Juni & Juli-Desember). Jurnal SOCA merupakan media untuk penyebarluasan hasil penelitian bagi dosen, peneliti, praktisi maupun masyarakat umum yang yang konsen terhadap pembangunan pertanian di Indonesia. Jurnal SOCA dikhususkan untuk menampung hasil penelitian, kajian pustaka/teoritis, kajian metodologis, gagasan original yang kritis, ulasan masalah penting/isu pembangunan pertanian yang hangat dan ulasan suatu hasil seminar.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 533 Documents
 3   4   5   6   7 
Cover SOCA. Vol.13, No.1, Februari 2019 Pengelola SOCA
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol.13, No.1, 2019
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (94.509 KB)

Abstract

Cover SOCA. Vol.13, No.1, Februari 2019
The Development of Food Security Model Based on Subak System in Bali Wayan Windia; Ketut Suamba; Wayan Sudarta
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 10, No. 1 Februari 2010
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (8309.174 KB)

Abstract

-
KEBIJAKAN TARIF IMPOR PAHA AYAM DALAM MELINDUNGI INDUSTRI PERUNGGASAN NASIONAL MASDJIDIN SIREGAR; I WAYAN RUSASTRA
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 3, No. 2 Juli 2003
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (96.482 KB)

Abstract

The objectives of this paper are to analyze the competitiveness and comparativeadvantage of broiler production and to recommend alternative policies on import tariff andnon-import tariff barriers for chicken leg-quarter (CLQ), aimed at protecting the nationalbroiler industry. The results of the analysis indicate that Indonesia has the comparativeadvantage of whole chicken, but not in the form of parting chicken, particularly CLQ. Underan assumption that the profit of broiler industry is at least 20 percent of the total broilerproduction costs, the import tariff rate for CLQ should be 100 percent of CIF value of US$630/ton. Should the profit be 25 percent and 30 percent of the total broiler production costs,the fair tariff rates would be 110 percent and 120 percent. Such an import tariff policy forCLQ should be complemented by several strategic non-tariff policies, i.e.: (i) ASUH policy(save, healthy, whole and halal) which is considered comprehensive and effective; (ii) overallreview on the implementation of halal conditions in USA; (iii) import quantity barrier forCLQ as raw material for processed meat industry; (iv) smuggling abolition and lawenforcement as the consequences of a high import tariff implementation; and (v) for theurgency and the economic viability of the national broiler industry, it is essential to carry outpolitical lobby to limit or even to stop CLQ export from USA to Indonesia.
KEBUTUHAN INVESTASI SEKTOR BASIS DAN NON BASIS DALAM PEREKONOMIAN REGIONAL BALI MADE ANTARA
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 7, No. 2 Juli 2007
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (204.173 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Implemented the law of number 32, 2004 about region government, is important moment for Bali Region Government to manage theirs region household, mainly to conduct reformation in various of development sectors. Decision need take in involved region autonomy is to develop the potential of basis sectors in effort to promote region economic growth and equity the result of development. Objective of the research are: (1) To identify basis sectors in economy of Bali Province, and (2) To analyze the investment need for each of basis sector that identify at point 1. The kind of research is quantitative of regional macroeconomic, meanwhile characterictic of research is veriificative-quantitative, namely to study and to explore of data and information of regional macro of Bali that sources from documents and reports that spread in various of government office. Data analyze use three methods, i.e.: (1) Location Quotient (LQ), (2) Incremental Capital Output Ratio (ICOR), and (3) Trend Linear Method. From the result of research and discussion find the substances follows: (1) From nine sectors in Bali Province Economy, only four sectors identified as basis sectors, showed by LQ value (average 6 years) > 1, namely agricultural sector (LQ=1.18), trade, hotel and restaurant sector (LQ=1.94). Transport and communication sector (LQ=1.69), and services sector (LQ=1.56). Meanwhile five sectors are non basis sectors that showed by LQ < 1, namely: mining and quarrying sector (LQ=0.08), manufacturing industry (LQ=0.33), electricity, gas and water supply (LQ=0.91), construction sector (0.75), financial, ownership and business services (LQ=0.94); (2) Based on sectors ICOR values, target of sectors growth and gross value added of basis sectors before tth year, so can estimate need the investment each of basis sectors in Bali Province Economy, follows: a.Need the investment of agricultural sector period 2005-2010 in succession Rp 227660.58 million (2005); Rp 262894.10 million (2006); Rp 302217.01 million (2007); Rp 346374.04 million (2008); Rp 396235.35 million (2009), and Rp 452822.84 million (2010), or need the total investment during six years are Rp 1988203.93 million or 1.988 quintillion. b.Need the investment of trade, hotel dan restaurant period 2005-2010 in succession Rp 133429.39 million (2005), Rp 110644.27 million (2006), Rp 87204.66 million (2007), Rp 63235.82 million (2008), Rp 38868.31 (2009) million, and Rp 14236,83 million (2010), or need the total investment during six years are Rp 447619.28 million or Rp 447,619 billion. c.Need the investment of transport and communication sectors period 2005-2010 in succession Rp 239636.39 million (2005), Rp 277659.86 million (2006), Rp 320010.27 million (2007), Rp 367486.98 million (2008), Rp 421022.76 million (2009), and Rp 481712.02 million (2010), or need the total investment during six years are Rp 2107528.29 million or Rp 2.108 quintillion. d.Need the investment of services sector period 2005-2010 in succession Rp 337103.91 million (2005), Rp 392065.64 million (2006), Rp 454163.76 million (2007), Rp 524787.43 million (2008), Rp 605584.36 million (2009), and Rp 698519.31 million (2010), or need the total investment during six years are Rp 3012224,40 million or Rp 3,012 quintillion. e.Need the total investment of four basis sectors 2005-2010 in succession Rp 937830.27 million (2005), Rp 1043263.87 million (2006), Rp 1163595.70 million (2007), Rp 1301884.27 million (2008), Rp 1461710.78 million (2009), dan Rp 1647291.00 million (2010), or need the total investment during six years is Rp 7555575.90 million or Rp 7,6 quintillion. f. Need the total investment for Bali economy period 2005-2010 in succession Rp 1645617.28 million (2005), Rp 1908279.94 million (2006), Rp 2222927.85 million (2007), Rp 2605284.29 million (2008), Rp 3076050.63 million (2009), dan Rp 3662854.34 million (2010), or need the total investment during six years is Rp 15121014.33 million or Rp 15,121 quintillion. g.Based on the finding of research, so can recomended to the Government of Bali Province Cq Bali Regional Planning Institution, namely: (1) The investment resources that limited, resources from government as well as private, in order used to develop basis sectors, namely Agricultural sector mainly farm food crops, livestock and products, and fishery; Trrade, hotel and restaurant sector, mainly hotel and restaurant; Transport and communication sector; and Services sector, mainly government and private services. Forth of this basis sector close linkages with the tourism that to be mover motor Bali economy’; (2) The regency government Cq Regency Regional Development Planning Office need to conduct analyze basis sector in regional economy of each. This involved with plan allocation of investment fund to basis sectors in each regency in Bali. Key Words: Basis Sectors, Economy, Location Quotient (LQ), Incremental Capital Output Ratio (ICOR) ABSTRAK Diberlakukannya Undang-Undang Nomor 32 tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah merupakan momen penting bagi Pemerintah Daerah Bali dalam mengurus rumahtangga daerahnya, terutama dalam melakukan reformasi di berbagai bidang pembangunan. Keputusan yang perlu diambil dalam menyikapi otonomi daerah adalah mengembangkan potensi sektor-sektor basis dan menentukan kebutuhan investasi masing-masing sektor basis dalam usaha memacu pertumbuhan ekonomi wilayah dan pemerataan hasil-hasil pembangunan. Adapun tujuan penelitian, yaitu: (1) Mengidentifikasi sektor-sektor basis dalam perekonomian Provinsi Bali, dan (2). Menganalisis kebutuhan investasi masing-masing sektor basis yang diidentifikasi pada butir 1. Jenis penelitian ini adalah kuantitatif ekonomi makro regional yang berbasis angka-angka. Sedangkan sifat penelitian yaitu verifikatif-kuantitatif, yaitu menggunakan formula-formula ekonomi regional terhadap data makro regional Bali yang bersumber pada dokumen-dokumen atau laporan-laporan yang tersebar di berbagai instansi pemerintah Bali. Analisis data menggunakan tiga metode yaitu: (1) Location Quotient (LQ), (2) Incremental Capital-Output Ratio (ICOR), dan (3) Metoda Trend Linear. Dari hasil analisis dan pembahasan ditemukan hal-hal sebagai berikut: (1) Dari sembilan sektor dalam perekonomian Provinsi Bali, hanya empat sektor teridentifikasi sebagai sektor basis yang ditunjukkan oleh nilai LQ (rata-rata 6 tahun) > 1, yaitu sektor pertanian (LQ = 1,18), sektor perdagangan, hotel dan restoran (LQ = 1,94), sektor pengangkutan dan komunikasi (LQ = 1,69), dan sektor jasa-jasa (LQ = 1,56). Sedangkan lima sektor adalah sektor non basis yang ditunjukkan oleh LQ < 1, yaitu: sektor pertambangan dan penggalian (LQ = 0,08), sektor industri pengolahan (LQ = 0,33), sektor listrik, gas dan air bersih (LQ = 0,91), sektor bangunan (LQ = 0,75), dan sektor keuangan persewaan dan jasa perusahaan (LQ = 0,94). (2) Berdasarkan ICOR, target pertumbuhan dan nilai tambah bruto (PDRB) sektor-sektor basis sebelum tahun ke-t (Yt-1), maka dapat diperkirakan kebutuhan investasi masing-masing sektor basis dalam perekonomian Provinsi Bali sebagai berikut: a. Kebutuhan investasi sektor pertanian periode 2005-2010 berturut-turut Rp 227660,58 juta (2005); Rp 262894,10 juta (2006); Rp 302217,01 juta (2007); Rp 346374, 04 juta (2008); Rp 396235,35 juta (2009) dan Rp 452822.84 juta (2010), atau kebutuhan total investasi selama enam tahun Rp 1988203,93 juta atau 1,988 triliyun. b. Kebutuhan investasi sektor perdagangan, hotel dan restoran periode 2005-2010 berturut-turut Rp 133429,39 juta (2005), Rp 110644,27 juta (2006), Rp 87204,66 juta (2007), Rp 63235,82 juta (2008), Rp 38868,31 (2009) juta, dan Rp 14236,83 juta (2010), atau kebutuhan total investasi selama enam tahun Rp 447619,28 juta atau Rp 447,619 milyar. c. Kebutuhan investasi sektor pengangkutan dan komunikasi periode 2005-2010 berturut-turut Rp 239636,39 juta (2005), Rp 277659,86 juta (2006), Rp 320010,27 juta (2007), Rp 367486,98 juta (2008), Rp 421022,76 juta (2009), dan Rp 481712,02 juta (2010), atau kebutuhan total investasi selama enam tahun Rp 2107528,29 juta atau Rp 2,108 triliyun. d. Kebutuhan investasi sektor jasa-jasa periode 2005-2010 berturut-turut Rp 337103,91 juta (2005), Rp 392065,64 juta (2006), Rp 454163,76 juta (2007), Rp 524787,43 juta (2008), Rp 605584,36 juta (2009), dan Rp 698519,31 juta (2010), atau total kebutuhan investasi selama enam tahun Rp3012224,40 juta atau Rp 3,012 triliyun. e. Kebutuhan investasi total empat sektor-sektor basis periode 2005-2010 berturut-turut Rp 937830,27 juta (2005), Rp 1043263,87 juta (2006), Rp 1163595,70 juta (2007), Rp 1301884,27 juta (2008), Rp 1461710,78 juta (2009), dan Rp 1647291,00 juta (2010), atau total kebutuhan investasi selama enam tahun Rp 7555575,90 juta atau Rp 7,6 triliyun. f. Kebutuhan investasi total untuk perekonomian Bali periode 2005-2010 berturut-turut Rp 1645617,28 juta (2005), Rp 1908279,94 juta (2006), Rp 2222927,85 juta (2007), Rp 2605284,29 juta (2008), Rp 3076050,63 juta (2009), dan Rp 3662854,34 juta (2010), atau total kebutuhan investasi selama enam tahun Rp 15121014,33 juta, atau Rp 15,121 triliyun. Dari hasil temuan penelitian, maka dapat direkomensikan kepada pemerintah Provinsi Bali Cq. Bappeda Bali, yaitu: (1) Sumberdaya investasi yang terbatas, baik bersumber dari pemerintah maupun swasta, agar dialokasikan mengembangkan sektor-sektor basis, yaitu sektor pertanian dalam arti luas, terutama subsektor tanaman pangan, peternakan dan perikanan; Sektor perdagangan, hotel dan restoran, terutama subsektor hotel dan subsektor restoran; Sektor pengangkutan dan komunikasi dan sektor jasa-jasa terutama jasa pemerintahan umum dan jasa swasta. Keempat sektor basis ini terkait erat dengan pariwisata yang menjadi motor penggerak perekonomian Bali; (2) Pemerintah Kabupaten Cq. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten di Bali perlu melakukan analisis sektor-sektor basis dalam perekonomian daerah masing-masing. Ini berkaitan dengan rencana alokasi sumberdaya investasi Pemerintah Provinsi Bali ke sektor-sektor basis di setiap kabupaten di Bali. Kata kunci: Sektor Basis, Perekonomian, Location Quotient (LQ), Incremental Capital Output Ratio (ICOR)
PENERAPAN TEKNOLOGI PENGENDALIAN HAMA TERPADU (PHT) PADA PERKEBUNAN RAKYAT JAMBU METE (Studi Kasus Petani Jambu Mete di Propinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat) ADE SUPRIATNA
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 6, No. 1 Februari 2006
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (65.033 KB)

Abstract

This study was conducted in 2003 and took place in Nusa Tenggara Barat (NTB).The objectives of study were: to evaluate the implementation of the integrated pestmanagement School on farmer field (IPM-FFS), farmers adoption of IPM technology,changes of farm productivity and income. The result showed, that majority of farmershave controlled the pest based on principles of IPM. Firstly, the farmer do preventivecontrol by adopting some practices to make crops grow healthy, apply biological andmechanical control, and also use organic pesticide. Finally, if the intensity of pest's attackwere still in the level of economic injury the farmer would use chemical pesticide. Agroecosystemobservation has been adopted by alumni farmer (100%) and non-alumni (34,5%), mechanical control have been adopted by (100%) and non-alumni (66, 6%), andorganic pesticide have been adopted by alumni (6, 7%) and non-alumni (13, 3%). Whilethe application of chemical pesticide not be found because the intensity of pest attack wasstill low and the costly pesticide price push reduction of chemical pesticide use. Thealumni productivity was 300kg and non-alumni were 270 kg/ha/year. If all expenses offarm were counted, farm benefit of alumni and non-alumni would be disadvantage,namely Rp.206 thousand and Rp.287 thousand/ha/year, respectively. If family labor costwere not counted, they would be advantage, namely Rp.858 thousand and Rp.735thousand/ha/year, respectively. Then if all expenditure coming from property of farmer(family labor and organic fertilizer) were not counted, they would be advantage, namelyRp.890 thousand and Rp.771 thousand/ha/year, respectively. Based on statistical test,productivity and farm benefit of alumni and non-alumni were not different. Introducingthe low cost technology (IPM-FFS) is very suited for cashew nut farmer because theircapital are still low such as using organic pesticides available in their field, biological andmechanical control, and organic manure. Considering its progress, IPM-FFS is suggestedto overspread to other location.
SOCA Vol.9 No.2 Juli 2009 Pengelola SOCA
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 9, No. 2 Juli 2009
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (22426.434 KB)

Abstract

Abstrak
ANALISIS NILAI TAMBAH KEDELAI SEBAGAI BAHAN BAKU TEMPE DI DESA ANGKATAN LOR, KECAMATAN TAMBAKROMO, KABUPATEN PATI Wiwik Lestari; Djoko Sumarjono; Titik Ekowati
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol 13 No 3 (2019): Vol. 13, No. 3, 2019
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (187.423 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/SOCA.2019.v13.i03.p10

Abstract

Agroindustry is one of the important sub-sectors to be developed. The development of agroindustry is expected to be able to absorb agricultural products from farmers. Agricultural products that are still in the form of primary products will be processed into secondary or tertiary products so that they will produce added value. The added value of a product is very important to increase the selling price of the product. The purpose of study are (1) calculate and analyze the value of tempe from the processing process to the consumer's hand, (2) analyze the effect of the amount of soybeans, the price of tempeh and the contribution of other inputs to the added value of tempe. The method used in this study is the census method. Sampling is done by taking all respondents totaling 34 tempe producers through interviews with the help of questionnaires. The added value was analyzed using the Hayami method. Test the difference in tempe value-added ratio using one sample t test. The test of the effect of the amount of soybeans, the price of tempe and the contribution of other inputs to added value using Multiple Linear Regression. Based on the results of the study it can be seen that the added value obtained from the processing of soybeans into tempe is significantly classified as moderate, which is equal to 34.65%. The price of tempe and the contribution of other inputs have a significant effect on the amount of added value of tempe, while the amount of soybeans does not significantly influence. The amount of added value produced shows that the tempe business can be developed. In order to increase the added value of tempe, tempe producers are advised to reduce the contribution costs of other inputs, especially on fuel costs and increase the selling price of tempe.
PEMBANGUNAN SISTEM AGRIBISNIS DI INDONESIA DAN PERANAN PUBLIC RELATION BUNGARAN SARAGIH
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 1, No. 2 Juli 2001
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (62.048 KB)

Abstract

Mistook of economic development strategy in lastime and economic crisis prolongedwith various its excess, to compel Indonesia choice alternative strategy in development ofeconomic, which hoped able to give solution of existing problems, without appear newproblems. Among some economic development strategy which fulfill the some conditions isAgribusiness Led Development, namely a strategy of economic development which integratedevelopment of agriculture (include estate crop, animal husbandry, fishery, and forestry) withdevelopment of agro-industry and linkage services setors. Development strategy ofagribusiness system to be convinced able to lead Indonesia economy has competitiveness andsinergys in the world economy.To develop the agribusiness system competitiveness, people-driven, sustainable anddecentralized are resposible all of agribusiness stake-holder, suitable with each role. Theentreprise is main actors of development agribusiness, the government have a role asfacilitator, regulator and promotor of agribusiness development, the researcher have a role todevelop of technology, education have a role to increase skill of human resources.Meanwhile, public relation profession have a role to build public good image, fordevelopment of agribusiness as well as for firm and agribusiness products.Special about the role of public relation (PR) in development of agribusiness system inIndonesia untill now still not develop yet. Whereas, PR functions very needed in developmentof agribusiness system, start from macro level till micro level. At macro level, role of PRhoped able to develop good image about importance to develop agribusiness in nationaleconomic development.
PERANAN KELOMPOK PETERNAK SAPI POTONG DENGAN PENDEKATAN SISTEM INTEGRASI PADI TERNAK (SIPT) DI NUSA TENGGARA BARAT, JAWA TIMUR, DAN JAWA BARAT CHAIRUL MUSLIM
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 6, No. 3 November 2006
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (72.859 KB)

Abstract

Cattle development program, such as SIPT activity, has been implemented since 2002 in 11province. In 2003, as its realization, cattle population has reached 2000 heads. This SIPTactivity is an effort to increase cattle production, as well as food production through cattleraising activities in irrigated food crop land agro ecosystem zone. The base of the programis food crop and cattle production activities with Zero Waste Base. The objective of thisresearch is to study how far the role of cattle raiser groups in implementing SIPT programis and its impact on SIPT non participant cattle raisers in West Nusa Tenggara, East Java,and West Java. The results of this study show that the role of cattle raiser groups inimplementing SIPT activities varies with the development condition in each region. Ingeneral, the cattle raiser groups have implemented and have taken the benefit of the goalsand basic concept of SIPT. Nevertheless, there are still some constrains and failures, suchas not maximally use of hay as cattle feed and not optimally use of collective cattle cage. Inthe future, government, especially local government, should be more serious in creatingconducive environment, such as good investment service and high attention to livestockdevelopment, especially cattle development.
KELEMBAGAAN PEMASARAN DAN KEMITRAAN KOMODITI SAYURAN Kasus di Desa-Desa di Jawa Tengah dan Sumatera Utara Endang Lestari Hastuti
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 4, No. 2 Juli 2004
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (74.547 KB)

Abstract

Institutional of Vegetable Commodity Marketing and Partnership: Cases in Villages ofCentral Java and North Sumatra. Although agribusiness is the biggest contributor of foreignexchange earnings, however, volume of imported vegetables and fruits tent to increase. Thissituation triggered some disadvantageous suppression on farm gate prices. The results of theresearch conducted in villages of Central and North Sumatra showed that national vegetableproducts could not compete with other country’s products. National trading pattern consistedof wholesale trading, medium scale trading and small scale trading. Marketing cost wasrelatively high while community’s accessibility on formal financing institutional was quitelow. Most traders served partnerships with farmers to maintain supply continuity in the meantime farmers could get capital for input production and marketing security. Consumer’s pricewas very fluctuate due to perishable natures and it is concentrated in a region. Consequently,relationship functions among agribusiness agents is required as well as storage facilities in theagribusiness centers.

Page 5 of 54 | Total Record : 533

 3   4   5   6   7 

Filter by Year

2000 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 17 No 2 (2023): Vol 17 No 2 (2023) Vol 17 No 1 (2023): Vol 17 No 1 (2023) Vol 16 No 3 (2022): Vol 16 No 3 (2022) Vol 16 No 2 (2022): Vol 16 No 2 (2022) Vol 16 No 1 (2022): Vol.16, No.1, 2022 Vol 15 No 3 (2021): Vol.15, No.3, 2021 Vol 15 No 2 (2021): Vol.15, No.2, 2021 Vol 15 No 1 (2021): Vol.15, No.1, 2021 Vol 14 No 3 (2020): Vol.14, No.3, 2020 Vol 14 No 2 (2020): Vol.14.No 2, 2020 Vol 14 No 1 (2020): Vol. 14 No. 1, 2020 Vol 13 No 3 (2019): Vol. 13, No. 3, 2019 Vol.13, No.2, 2019 Vol.13, No.1, 2019 Vol.12, No.2, 2018 Vol.12, No.1, 2018 Vol. 11, No. 1 Juli 2011 Vol. 10, No. 2 Juli 2010 Vol. 10, No. 1 Februari 2010 Vol. 9, No. 3 November 2009 Vol. 9, No. 2 Juli 2009 Vol. 8, No. 2 Juli 2008 Vol. 8, No. 1 Februari 2008 Vol. 7, No. 3 November 2007 Vol. 7, No. 2 Juli 2007 Vol. 7, No. 1 February 2007 Vol. 6, No. 3 November 2006 Vol. 6, No. 2 Juli 2006 Vol. 6, No. 1 Februari 2006 Vol. 5, No. 3 November 2005 Vol. 5, No. 2 Juli 2005 Vol. 5, No. 1 Februari 2005 Vol. 4, No. 2 Juli 2004 Vol. 4, No. 1 Februari 2004 Vol. 3, No. 2 Juli 2003 Vol. 3, No. 1 Februari 2003 Vol. 2, No. 2 Juli 2002 Vol. 2, No. 1 Februari 2002 Vol. 1, No. 2 Juli 2001 Vol. 1, No. 1 Februari 2001 Vol. 0, No. 1 November 2000 Vol. 4, No. 3 November2004 More Issue