Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

PENGAWASAN TERHADAP SYARAT UMUM DAN KHUSUS DALAM PELAKSANAAN PIDANA BERSYARAT Subekti Budi Utami, Niken
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 1, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v1i1.10606

AbstractThe probation is an alternative conditional independence revocation entity that is intended to avoid some negative impact from the implementation of the criminal in prison. Implementation of probation committed outside the correctional institution with provisions for prisoners on probation must abide by conditions set by the judge requirements to be supervised by a supervisory officer. The purpose of this study is to investigate the implementation of the supervision of general and specific requirements by the supervisory officer in this case conducted by the supervisory judge observer (kimwasmat), prosecutors and Correctional Center (BAPAS). This research was conducted with library research to obtain secondary data and field research to obtain primary data. In conducting surveillance, kimwasmat never touched prisoner probation supervision, citing a judge's limited ability to perform tasks supervisory oversight of all court decisions, in addition to the obstruction of funding is not budgeted specifically for the task. Supervision conducted by the prosecutor is also not running, because prosecutors had handed over control to BAPAS. The supervision by BAPAS is precisely the effective control, because it is done with two-way method, which offenders are required to report to the office of BAPAS for any particular period and given guidance in the form of mental training and skills. Supervising social each month, also visited a client's home with intent to know the development of coaching. Based on data obtained from BAPAS Yogyakarta during the last year and a half, never breach the terms of which the judge determined, so it can be said implementation of the supervision and coaching successful. Keywords: supervision, probation, general and special requirements.

Conjugal Visit: Juridical Review of the Fulfillment of Inmates’ Rights in the Correctional Perspective Niken Subekti Budi Utami; Octa Nadia Mellynda
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 16, No 1 (2022): March Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Research and Development Agency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2022.V16.97-118

Imprisonment as a loss of independence should only limit the inmates’ freedom of movement in a correctional institution. This interpretation rises a discourse that the fulfillment of other rights of inmates must be guaranteed, including the right to fulfill their sexual needs. A term that is known globally in order to fulfill this right is called a conjugal visit. This study seeks to describe the urgency and prospects of conjugal visit for inmates in Indonesia. In addition, this study aims to provide an overview of the arrangement and implementation of conjugal visit. This legal research was normative legal research supported by the results of interviews with resource persons. The data obtained from the literature research were analyzed descriptive-qualitatively with a legal systematic approach and legal comparison. The results of this study indicate that sexual needs are one of the human rights. They are the inmates’ basic needs that must be fulfilled. The failure to fulfill these basic needs will have a negative impact both physically and psychologically. Based on the theory of basic human needs, the rules of international law, namely the Nelson Mandela Rules and the Bangkok Rules, as well as national law, namely the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health, conjugal visit can actually be implemented in Indonesia with clear legal bases in Indonesian law. Establishment of regulations regarding conjugal visit is done by comparing practices in other countries and aligned withn the Legal System Theory. These countries have similar backgrounds to Indonesia and have implemented conjugal visit, namely Pakistan, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia.

KRIMINALISASI PENGELOLAAN ZAKAT (TINJAUAN KETENTUAN PASAL 41 UU NO 23 TAHUN 2011) Niken Subekti Budi Utami; Destri Budi Nugraheni
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 2, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v2i1.11064

ABSTRACTThis research was conducted wih library research to obtain secondary data and field research to obtain primary data.The results of this study indicate that in the view of Islamic Scientist, Zakat Management Act there are some drawbacks. First, under the coordination of placement BAZNAS, LAZ cause has no authority, but on the other side of the LAZ are required to make the report public accounting. Second, LAZ could only have authority when a public organization that has a community empowerment program, but this provision may result in unfair LAZ in the management of zakat, as it will further the interests of these organizations. Third, to implement the Zakat Management Act needs to be made government regulation, so that its implemen- tation will bring benefits to the community and not cause harm. According to the criminal scientist, the provisions of article 41 UUPZ which impose criminal sanctions for unlicensed LAZ that felt quite right, because the intent of legislator of UUPZ, zakat management is done professionally so that it will create a prosperous society, as well as the criteria of the criminalization of the LAZ is not permitted, which include the purpose of imposition of penalty, the onset of the victim, the principle of cost and the results, the ability of law enforcement officials and the public support, are not appropriate.Keyword : zakat, LAZ,criminalitation AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengelolaan zakat yang dilakukan oleh lembaga pengelola zakat apabila ditinjau dari perspektif Hukum Islam dan untuk mengetahui kriminalisasi dalam Pasal 41 UU No. 23Tahun 2011 tentang Pengelolaan Zakat ditinjau dari perspektif Hukum Pidana. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis empiris yang dilakukan melalui penelitian pustaka dan penelitian lapangan dengan metode Focus Group Discussion. Narasumber adalah para ahli hukum Islam dan Hukum Pidana, sedangkan para responden adalah pengelola Lembaga Amil Zakat yang berada di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, baik pengelola dari Lembaga Amil Zakat yang telah berijin maupun yang belum berijin. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ahli hukum Islam menyatakan bahwa para ulama sepakat, wajib atas penguasa untuk mengangkat amil atau lembaga pengelola zakat. Namun, rumusan pengelolaan zakat secara sentralisasi berada di tangan pemerintah, masih dapat diperdebatkan dengan melihat peran masyarakat yang gemilang dalam pengelolaan zakat melalui LAZ. Kriteria kriminalisasi yang meliputi pemidanaan harus memperhatikan tujuannya, adanya unsur victimizing, prinsip biaya dan hasil, dan dukungan masyarakat, tidak terpenuhi dalam mengkriminalisasi LAZ seperti yang ditentukan dalam Pasal 41 UU Pengelolaan Zakat. Maksud dari pemerintah membentuk UUPZ baru, adalah untuk lebih meningkatkan pengumpulan, pendistribusian dan pendayagunaan zakat, sehingga dapat menciptakan masyarakat Indonesia yang sejahtera. Mencermati maksud tersebut, dirasakan kurang tepat ketentuan pemidanaan bagi LAZ karena tidak adanya catatan buruk kinerja LAZ dan apabila hukum dipandang sebagai alat untuk melakukan perubahan sosial, yaitu mengubah masyarakat yang miskin menjadi sejahtera, maka selayaknya bukan pendekatan sanksi yang dilakukan melainkan dengan pendekatan berupa insentif.Kata kunci : Zakat, Lembaga Amil Zakat, kriminalisasi

YURISDIKSI PERADILAN TERHADAP PRAJURIT TENTARA NASIONAL INDONESIA SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA Niken Subekti Budi Utami; Supriyadi ,
Yustisia Vol 3, No 2: August 2014
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11102

AbstractThis research intends to find the answers of two problems. First, the factors that led to the unimplemented jurisdiction of the General Court of the Indonesian Armed Forces (TNI) that perform general crime as mandated by Decree No. VII / MPR / 2000 and Act No. 34 of 2004. Second, the perception of the military conception of justice with jurisdiction over soldiers who committed the crime. This study is a normative- empirical law that uses secondary data and primary data. The data collected by the study of documents and interviews. The data analysis using qualitative methods. The results showed that first the jurisdiction of the General Court of the soldiers who committed the crime can not be implemented because of the general Act No. 31 of 1997 on Military Justice has not been revised by Law Military Justice as new, second that some of the military still wants the soldiers who committed the crime, criminal acts both military and general crime, is in the jurisdiction of Military Justice.Keywords: Jurisdiction Court, Indonesian Army Forces (TNI)l, Crime.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan jawaban atas dua permasalahan. Pertama, faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan belum diimplementasikannya yurisdiksi Peradilan Umum terhadap prajurit Tentara Nasional Indonesia (TNI) yang melakukan tindak pidana umum sebagaimana diamanatkan oleh Ketetapan MPR Nomor VII/MPR/2000 dan Â Undang-Undang Nomor 34 Tahun 2004. Kedua, persepsi kalangan militer mengenai konsepsi peradilan yang berwenang mengadili prajurit TNI yang melakukan tindak pidana. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif-empiris yang menggunakan data sekunder dan data primer. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan studi dokumen dan wawancara. Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, pertama yurisdiksi Peradilan Umum terhadap prajurit TNI yang melakukan tindak pidana umum belum dapat diimplementasikan karena Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1997 tentang Peradilan Militer belum direvisi dengan Undang-Undang Peradilan Militer yang baru, kedua bahwa beberapa kalangan militer tetap menghendaki agar prajurit TNI yang melakukan tindak pidana, baik tindak pidana militer maupun tindak pidana umum, berada pada yurisdiksi Peradilan Militer.Kata Kunci: Yurisdiksi Peradilan, Prajurit TNI, Tindak Pidana

PELAKSANAAN REHABILITASI BAGI PECANDU NARKOTIKA PASCA BERLAKUNYA PERATURAN BERSAMA 7 (TUJUH) LEMBAGA NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA Dani Krisnawati; Niken Subekti Budi Utami
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 27, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

This study is a normative-empirical research that use secondary and primary data. In the case of a voluntary reporting to the Sleman Police Precinct investigator by the drug addicts, the case will be coordinated tothe medical and/or social rehabilitation agency, in this case is PSPP. However, after the implementationof Joint Regulation, no drug addicts voluntarily reported themselves. Whenever the suspects of thedrug addiction that were caught, the Sleman Police Precinct investigator which is the element of lawenforcement team beside the Sleman Narcotics National Agency, Sleman District Attorney, and RegionalOffice of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights Yogyakarta Province, coordinate themselves as a part ofa joint assessment team, including with the Bhayangkara Hospital and Grhasia Hospital which serve asthe medical doctor team. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif empiris yang mengolah data primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tindakan penyidik pasca berlakunya Peraturan Bersama terhadap pecanduyang secara sukarela melaporkan diri ke penyidik Polres Sleman, akan dikoordinasikan ke lembaga medisdan/atau sosial, dalam hal ini Panti Sosial Pamardi Putra. Meskipun pasca berlakunya Peraturan Bersamabelum ada pecandu yang secara sukarela melaporkan diri, sedangkan bagi tersangka pecandu narkotikayang ditangkap, penyidik Polres Sleman saling berkoordinasi dengan tim hukum yang lain sebagai bagiandari tim assessment terpadu dan tim dokter dari Rumah Sakit Bhayangkara dan Rumah Sakit Grhasia yangmerupakan bagian dari tim dokter.

PROBLEMATIKA PERMOHONAN GRASI MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 22 TAHUN 2002 Niken Subekti Budi Utami
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 20, No 1 (2008)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

According to executor attorney opinion, no time limit for application clemency, it wills be performing deep constraint on dead punishment execution. Execution of dead punishment also constraint by rule that allows criminal to propose the second clemency application. This constraint still is added by condition that second clemency application is two years of first clemency rejection. Meanwhile according to criminal lawyer reception, with no rule upon, constitute a advantage by criminal dead, since it can propose clemency without time limit for first clemency application and also second application, so execution could be delayed. At Yogyakarta court since year 2002 until now there is no criminal propose clemencies. It is caused, firstly, certain verdict type that could be requested for clemency, secondary by apply clemency cause dead sentence is no postpone except for dead verdict, thirdly most criminal on narcotic and drug abuse case was pleased with first grade verdict.

PENANGANAN TERHADAP ANAK BELUM BERUMUR 12 (DUA BELAS) TAHUN YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA BERDASARKAN SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK Dani Krisnawati; Niken Subekti Budi Utami
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 32, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.40313

AbstractThis research is aimed at investigating the process to deal with and the implementation of the decisions against children under 12 years of age who commit crimes. The approach of this research is a normative empirical legal research with the location in DIY region. During the research, using primary, secondary and data analysis using qualitative descriptive methods, it was found that the process of dealing and implementing decisions often ignore statutory instruments and The Principles of The Juvenile Justice System. Most of the processes in managing the cases are also only formalities. As the results, children will likely to repeat their crime acts. It is therefore necessary to develop a standardization of guidance and guidance for LPKS owned by the government and non-government institutions, as well as to increase the capability of Police Investigators, Community Counselors and Professional Social Workers. IntisariPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui proses penanganan dan pelaksanaan keputusan terhadap Anak belum berumur 12 tahun yang melakukan tindak pidana. Pendekatan yang dilakukan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif empiris dengan lokasi penelitian di wilayah DIY. Hasil penelitian dengan data primer, sekunder dan analisis deskriptif kualitatif menunjukkan bahwa proses penanganan dan pelaksanaan keputusan terhadap Anak seringkali mengabaikan instrumen peraturan perundang-undangan, prinsip-prinsip Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dan sebagian besar bersifat formalitas. Kondisi ini memberi peluang Anak mengulangi tindak pidana. Perlu disusun standarisasi pembinaan dan pembimbingan bagi LPKS milik pemerintah maupun swasta, serta peningkatan kapabilitas Penyidik Polri, Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan dan Pekerja Sosial Profesional.

LEGAL PROTECTION FOR CHILDREN AS VICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN FULFILLMENT RESTITUTION RIGHTS Niken Subekti Budi Utami; Imam Prabowo
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 9, No 2: August 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v9i2.35208

This is an empirical normative study, which aims to determine the legal protection for child victims of sexual violence in the context of law enforcement and the implementation of the right to restitution. In addition, the materials used were primary and secondary data. The legal instrument that implements the rights to restitution for children victims is the arrangement of articles that are unclear and incomplete, resulting in problems. However, bad judges prevent courts from implementing these rights. Unclear and incomplete rules on procedures concerning restitution rights have resulted in an understanding of law enforcement officials, especially in conducting the inter-court application process, and proceedings. Meanwhile, the human resource factors in supporting the fulfillment of restitution are deemed inadequate. The existence of a legal vacuum in the procedures for fulfilling these rights has made the public prosecutor to implement the court resolution and make innovation through consensus decision making.

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 8 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search