Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Students’ Learning Motivation through the Quality of Scientific Argumentation Skills and Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcomes on Newton's Laws: A Relationship Analysis Almira Betari; Alvi Hasanati; Fitroh Fuadah; Muhammad Taufiqurrahman Amir; Parno Parno
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni Vol 10, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (746.14 KB) | DOI: 10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v10i1.7642

Abstract

Theory about Newton's Law is considered difficult for students. Many students cannot solve Newton's Law’s problems caused they cannot understand the concept. Concept understanding requires complex learning by increasing students’ motivation. This study aimed to explore the relationship between students’ motivation through scientific argumentation skills and students’ learning outcomes on Newton's laws. This research was a non-experimental mixed-method study with an embedded-correlational research design. The subjects of this study were 32 students of Senior High School (SMA) Laboratory UM Malang (State University of Malang). The sampling technique used in the study was purposive sampling, specifically homogeneity sampling. The research instrument consisted of open-ended questions, semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, and document identification. The data analysis technique used was a partial correlation test for quantitative data and descriptive analysis through coding for qualitative data. The results showed that the quality of students' scientific arguments was most dominant at Level 2. The arguments consisted of claims supported by data. However, the students sometimes claimed incorrect understanding of Newton's Laws I and II. The results of the partial correlation test between motivation and scientific argumentation and student cognitive learning outcomes did not show any correlation. However, there was a positive effect.
THE DEVELOPMENT OF MENTAL MODELS TEST ON HEAT AND TEMPERATURE Rian Priyadi; Markus Diantoro; Parno Parno
EDUSAINS Vol 11, No 2 (2019): EDUSAINS
Publisher : Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, UIN (State Islamic University) Syarif Hidayatul

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (266.771 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/es.v11i2.10332

Abstract

PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN MODEL MENTAL PADA TOPIK SUHU DAN KALORAbstrakKami telah mengembangkan tes sebagai analisis model mental pada materi suhu dan kalor. Penelitian pengembangan ini didasarkan pada pentingnya mengetahui tingkatan model mental siswa. Model mental merupakan representasi internal siswa dalam memahami sebuah konsep.  Penelitian ini menggunakan model pengembangan 4-D. Produk yang dihasilkan merupakan instrumen analisis model mental berupa soal terbuka.  Selanjutnya, instrumen tes model mental diujicobakan kepada responden (N=90) untuk mengukur validitas dan reliabilitas. Tes yang telah dikembangkan terdiri dari 8 soal dengan reliabilitas sebesar 0,667. Berdasarkan analisis data, instrumen tes model mental pada materi suhu dan kalor layak digunakan sebagai instrumen penilaian. AbstractWe have developed test inventory as an analysis of mental models on heat and temperature topics. This development research based on the importance of knowing the level of students' mental models. The mental models are a student’s internal representation of understanding a concept. This study uses a 4-D model. The product being produced is a mental model analysis consists of open-ended questions. Furthermore, mental models test were tested on respondents (N = 90) to measure the validity and reliability. The test that has been developed consists of 8 questions with a value of reliability is 0.667. Based on data analysis, the test of mental models on heat and temperature topics is feasible to use as an assessment instrument. 
Needs Analysis of Class XII Students of MA Raudlatul Ulum on the Development of a Recitation Program as an Interactive Learning Media on Magnetic Field Material Isna Fatimatuzzahroh; Parno Parno
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT) Vol 8 No 1 (2022): January-June
Publisher : Department of Physics Education, Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jpft.v8i1.3508

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the needs of Class XII students of MA Raudlatul Ulum for the recitation program as an interactive learning media on magnetic field material. This research’s method is descriptive. The research subjects are class XII students of MA Raudlatul Ulum who have taken magnetic field subject. The data collection techniques are interview with 1 teacher who teaches magnetic field subject and questionnaires for 30 students. Based on the data obtained, we identified several problems that occur in the magnetic field material, including (1) the lack of time allocation in the learning process despite the magnetic field material being a broad and complex material, (2) the lack of feedback in learning, (3) less interactive and boring learning media used, (4) lack of practice questions. Referring to these problems, it is necessary to develop a recitation program as an interactive learning media on magnetic field material. This program contains practice questions accompanied by feedback on each correct or incorrect answer.
Student’s Scientific Argumentation Skills on Heat and Temperature Rian Priyadi; Markus Diantoro; Parno Parno
Pancaran Pendidikan Vol 7, No 4 (2018)
Publisher : The Faculty of Teacher Training and Education The University of Jember Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (617.983 KB) | DOI: 10.25037/pancaran.v7i3.200

Abstract

The weak of students' scientific argumentation skills in lessons has been a concern, especially in applying concepts of heat and temperature. Although heat and temperature are related to daily activity, it doesn’t ensure that students have the correct concept. This study purposes to describe students' scientific argumentation skills on heat and temperature. This research was conducted on 11th-grade in mathematics and science students in Senior High School 4 of Malang. This study found that students' scientific argumentation skills on average were at level 2nd and level 3rd. In addition, we found three patterns of scientific argumentation skills: (1) correct claims and evidence are accompanied by support for the evidence provided, (2) correct claims but use incomplete evidence, and (3) correct claims but the evidence is given wrong. This result it is expected to be the attention of teachers to implement learning models that can improve students' scientific argumentation skills.
Students’ Learning Motivation through the Quality of Scientific Argumentation Skills and Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcomes on Newton's Laws: A Relationship Analysis Almira Betari; Alvi Hasanati; Fitroh Fuadah; Muhammad Taufiqurrahman Amir; Parno Parno
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni Vol 10, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v10i1.7642

Abstract

Theory about Newton's Law is considered difficult for students. Many students cannot solve Newton's Law’s problems caused they cannot understand the concept. Concept understanding requires complex learning by increasing students’ motivation. This study aimed to explore the relationship between students’ motivation through scientific argumentation skills and students’ learning outcomes on Newton's laws. This research was a non-experimental mixed-method study with an embedded-correlational research design. The subjects of this study were 32 students of Senior High School (SMA) Laboratory UM Malang (State University of Malang). The sampling technique used in the study was purposive sampling, specifically homogeneity sampling. The research instrument consisted of open-ended questions, semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, and document identification. The data analysis technique used was a partial correlation test for quantitative data and descriptive analysis through coding for qualitative data. The results showed that the quality of students' scientific arguments was most dominant at Level 2. The arguments consisted of claims supported by data. However, the students sometimes claimed incorrect understanding of Newton's Laws I and II. The results of the partial correlation test between motivation and scientific argumentation and student cognitive learning outcomes did not show any correlation. However, there was a positive effect.