Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SUHUF: Jurnal Pengkajian Al-Qur'an dan Budaya AL-THIQAH: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman
Umar Zakka
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PEMETAAN BARU METODE DAN MODEL PENELITIAN TAFSIR Umar Zakka; M Thohir
Al-Thiqah : Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman Vol 4 No 2 (2021): Oktober
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ushuluddin Darussalam Bangkalan Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Many researcher of Qur’an and tafsir still making mistake of term in the application of the qur’anic and tafsir researc method. This is because there is no difference between the tafsir method, tafsir research method and tafsir form reasearch. So, the purpose of this research is 2, first to know the definition of tafsir method, tafsir research method and tafsir form research. Second to know the mapping in tafsir method, tafsir research method and tafsir form research. Tafsir method is how to intrepret the verses of the Qur’an, while the tafsir research method is how to interpret the interpretation of mufassir and tafsir form research is format of research. Different of tafsir method and tafsir research method is material object of research. Material object of research in tafsir method is verse of Qur’an and material object of research in tafsir research method is interpretation of mufassir to verses of Qur’an. As for application of method is same, there are 4 ; first from the source aspect is 3 it is: al-ma’thu>r, al-ra’yu and izdiwaj al-mas}a>dir, second from the way of interpretation aspect is 3, it is: baya>niy, muqa>rin, and al-izdiwa>j al-kayfiy, third from breadth of interpretation aspect is 2, it is: it}na>biy and ijma>liy, and fourth from orderly of interpretation aspect is 3, it is: tah}li>liy, mawd}u>’iy and nuzu>liy. Format of tafsir research divided into 4, it is: teks research, ancient script research (philology), living qur’an research, and character research.
Pergeseran Wacana Penafsiran Hubungan Antara Muslim dengan Ahli Kitab di Indonesia: Perbandingan Penafsiran Hamka dan Nadirsyah Hosen terhadap Surah Al-Baqarah/2:120 Abd Muin; Riksan Riksan; Umar Zakka
SUHUF Vol 15 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur'an

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22548/shf.v15i2.758

Abstract

This article aims to portray the shift in the interpretation of Indonesian mufasir towards al-Baqarah/2: 120 between Hamka, who lived during the transition to independence and Nadirsyah Hosen, who lived in an era of openness and dynamics. Through qualitative research methods in the form of literature and critical discourse analysis approaches, the authors found. First, Hamka's interpretation contains sentiments towards non-Muslims in the form of Christianization and the spread of Jewish influence on Muslims. Hamka's contacts with non-Muslims influenced this interpretation during the war for independence, and Tafsir al-Azhar was written during a period of solid nationalism, which influenced dominant public discourse. Second, the interpretation of Hamka has shifted due to Indonesia's different situations and conditions today. Nadisyah Hosen interpreted the word millah to mean the Qiblah and self-identity and only focused on the Prophet Muhammad and the People of the Book around Medina as a reminder, not an attempt to Christianize and control the Jews over Muslims. This interpretation is influenced by Nadirsyah Hosen's life experiences while studying and having a career abroad and the influence of Gus Dur's thinking.
Co-Authors Abd Muin M Thohir Riksan Riksan