Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Spektrum Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan
Astuti, Titin Widhi
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Spektrum Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan

 1 
Advocacy of The Ombudsman Institute for The Special Region of Yogyakarta in Completing The Complaints of Educational Problems in The Special Region of Yogyakarta Astuti, Titin Widhi
Spektrum Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan Vol 10, No 3 (2021): Spektrum Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/sakp.v10i3.17459

Abstract

This study aims to describe the Advocacy of the Ombudsman Institute for the Special Region of Yogyakarta in completing the complaints of education problems in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. Data validity uses triangulation of sources, techniques, and time. Data analysis techniques include data collection, data condensation, data presentation, and conclusion drawings. Research Results: (1) Complaint of Education Problems in DIY Ombudsman Institutions Mapped into a Regular Complaint (Governance of Education and School Management) and Temporary (PPDB), (2) Stages of Advocacy for DIY Ombudsman Institutions, namely the Stage of Preparation (Consultation and Clarification), Implementation Stage (Coordination, investigation, mediation), and stages of assessment (monitoring). Advocacy of DIY Ombudsman Institutions specifically for education, namely educational complaints posts. (3) Supporting factors, namely the existence of pic every education office, complete documents, cooperative attitudes, and monitoring. Inhibiting factors, namely the lack of human resources, community concerns over the impact of the report, the school's violation of the definition of donations and levies, the final product recommendations as input, and the wrong perception of the public.
Co-Authors