Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Abdimas BSI: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Equilibrium: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi Jurnal Dewantara AL-HIKMAH : Jurnal Theosofi dan Peradaban Islam Al Khidma: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Masnah Masnah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Dewantara

 1 
Pendekatan Savi Model Examples Non Examples Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa smpn 1 Banjar Margo Kabupaten Tulang Bawang Masnah Masnah
Jurnal Dewantara Vol 6 No 02 (2018): Jurnal Dewantara
Publisher : MKKS SMA, MKKS SMP se-Kota Metro, Persatuan Sarjana Pendidikan Islam Wilayah Provinsi Lampung, dan CV.IQRO Penerbitan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (330.539 KB)

Abstract

Learning PAI in class VIII of SMP Negeri 1 Banjar Margo is still lacking. In this shortage it is not because the teacher does not master the material, but does not know how to deliver the material properly and correctly, and the teacher does not use the teaching aids or media well in the student environment. Therefore the authors conducted Classroom Action Research (CAR) with the results of discussing the activeness of students in the first cycle who got a score of 5%, score b = 30%, score c = 65%. Learning outcomes M KKM, which gets a score of = 0%, score b = 27%, score c = 17%. Portfolio data that gets a score of = 3%, score b = 40%, score c = 57%. Cycle 2 Meeting 5, active learning that gets a score = 23%, score b = 45%, score c = 32%. Learning outcomes M KKM, which gets a score of = 23%, score b = 47%, score c = 23%. Portfolio data that gets a score of = 30%, score b = 47%, score c = 23%. Meeting 6, active learning that gets a score of = 30%, score b = 53%, score c = 17%. Learning outcomes ≥ KKM, which gets a score = 50%, score b = 40%, score c = 10%. Portfolio data that gets a score of = 40%, score b = 47%, score c = 13%. These three aspects have increased.
Co-Authors Agus Salim Alfiah Alfaridho Amalia Amalia Aulia Sri Djudjur Luciana Radjagukguk Eka Rosliani Haedar Haedar Hapid Hapid Hasna Abidah Jamiah Jamiah Muh. Haris Zubaidillah Munawwarah Munawwarah Nur Abidah