S. ENDANG PRASETYAWATI
Universitas Bandar Lampung

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Widya Yuridika

Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pengangkutan Satwa Yang Dilindungi Dalam Keadaan Hidup Secara Ilegal (Studi Putusan Nomor 592/Pid.B/Lh/2020/Pn.Tjk) Erlina B.; S. Endang Prasetyawati; Nita Yolanda
Widya Yuridika Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v4i1.2190

Abstract

The purpose of this research are to describe: (1) Factors causing the criminal act of transporting protected animals while alive based on Decision Number: 592/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Tjk (2) Criminal responsibility of the perpetrator of the criminal act of transporting protected animals in a living condition based on Decision Number: 592/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Tjk? This study uses a normative and empirical juridical approach. Data collection was carried out by means of library research and field studies. The data then analyzed qualitatively to get the research conclusion. The results of this study indicate: (1) The factors causing the criminal act of transporting protected animals while alive in Decision Number: 592/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Tjk consist of internal factors and external factors. The internal factor comes from within the perpetrator, namely the urge to meet economic needs in accordance with his job as a rental car driver and the perpetrator feels safe even though he commits a crime because the perpetrator feels that the person renting a rental car and using his services is a Marine Corporal Two (Kopda). External factors, originating from outside the perpetrator, namely an invitation from another party to commit the crime, namely an invitation from a Marine Corporal Two (Kopda) rank to transport protected animals illegally. (2) The responsibility of the perpetrator of the criminal act of transporting protected animals alive illegally in Decision Number: 592/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Tjk is based on the defendant's fault, no justification and no excuse for the defendant. for his actions. This criminal responsibility is manifested by imposing a sentence against the defendant with imprisonment of 1 (one) year and 4 (four) months and a criminal fine of Rp 50,000,000.00 (fifty million rupiah) provided that if the fine is not paid, it is replaced by imprisonment. for 1 (one) month.Abstrak Tujuan  penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui: (1) Faktor penyebab terjadinya tindak pidana pengangkutan satwa yang dilindungi dalam keadaan hidup berdasarkan Putusan Nomor: 592/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Tjk (2) Pertanggungjawaban pelaku tindak pidana pengangkutan satwa yang dilindungi dalam keadaan hidup berdasarkan Putusan Nomor: 592/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Tjk. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan yuridis empiris. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan studi kepustakaan dan studi lapangan. Data selanjutnya dianalisis secara kualitatif untuk mendapatkan kesimpulan penelitian. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan: (1) Faktor penyebab terjadinya tindak pidana pengangkutan satwa yang dilindungi dalam keadaan hidup dalam Putusan Nomor: 592/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Tjk terdiri dari  atas faktor internal dan faktor eksternal. Faktor internal, berasal dari dalam diri pelaku yaitu dorongan untuk memenuhi kebutuhan ekonomi sesuai dengan pekerjaannya sebagai sopir mobil rental dan pelaku merasa aman meskipun melakukan tindak pidana sebab pelaku merasa bahwa yang menyewa mobil rental dan menggunakan jasanya adalah anggota Marinir berpangkat Kopral Dua (Kopda). Faktor eksternal, berasal dari luar diri pelaku yaitu adanya ajakan dari pihak lain untuk melakukan tindak pidana tersebut, yaitu ajakan dari seorang anggota Marinir berpangkat Kopral Dua (Kopda) untuk mengangkut satwa yang dilindungi secara ilegal. (2) Pertanggungjawaban pelaku tindak pidana pengangkutan satwa yang dilindungi dalam keadaan hidup secara ilegal  dalam Putusan Nomor: 592/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Tjk   didasarkan  pada  adanya  kesalahan  terdakwa,  tidak adanya alasan pembenar dan tidak ada alasan pemaaf bagi terdakwa atas perbuatannya. Pertanggungjawaban pidana tersebut diwujudkan dengan penjatuhan pidana terhadap terdakwa dengan pidana penjara selama 1 (satu) tahun dan 4 (empat) bulan dan denda pidana sejumlah Rp.50.000.000,00 (lima puluh juta rupiah) dengan ketentuan apabila denda tersebut tidak dibayar diganti dengan pidana kurungan selama 1 (satu) bulan.
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Dana Beasiswa Pendidikan (Studi Putusan Nomor 178/Pdt.G/2019/Pn.Tjk) Zainab Ompu Jainah; S. Endang Prasetyawati; Putri Mawardita Puspitasari
Widya Yuridika Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v4i1.2221

Abstract

Default is the implementation of obligations that are not fulfilled or broken promises or negligence made by the debtor either due to not carrying out what has been promised or even doing something that according to the agreement cannot be done. The problem in this study is how to resolve default disputes in the educational scholarship fund agreement based on decision Number 178 / Pdt.G / 2019 / PN.Tjk and how the judges' legal considerations against default disputes in the educational scholarship fund agreement based on decision Number 178 / Pdt.G / 2019 / PN.Tjk. The research method used is a normative juridical approach and an empirical approach. Data collection procedure consists of the study of literature (Library Research)and field (Field Research). Meanwhile, data processing is done by using the methods of editing, systematizing and classifying the data. The analysis used is qualitative. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the settlement of default disputes in the educational scholarship fund agreement is the compensation for damages accompanied by the cancellation of the agreement. Then the judge's legal consideration of the dispute of default in the educational scholarship fund agreement is that the defendant has not at all carried out his achievements or obligations to the plaintiff since graduating from the Specialist Doctor Education Program (PPDS) Obstetrics and Gynecology Study Program at the Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University. The suggestion in this study is that dispute resolution using a non-litigation approach is the best way and judges in deciding a case must still refer to the agreement made by the parties.