Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM

Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Perkawinan dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Anak dan Perempuan di Pengadilan Agama Sumatera Selatan Sri Turatmiyah; M. Syaifuddin; Arfianna Novera
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 22 No. 1: Januari 2015
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol22.iss1.art8

Abstract

This study discusses the factors causing the cancellation of the marriage in the Religious Court of Palembang, Lubuklinggau, Muaraenim and its legal consequences for the child and the wife. The study was conducted normatively supported by empirical evidences. The study concluded that first, in Decision No. 0587 / Pdt.G / 2013 / PA.Plg and 796 / Pdt.G / 2010 / PA.Llg contributing factor of marriage cancellation is unpermitted polygamy and unauthorized guardian. Secondly, the legal consequences for the child according to Article 28 of Marriage Law is that the child remain legitimate and for his wife in good faith, the marriage still posseses a legal effect which is valid for a husband and wife. If the marriage took place without the goodwill of the husband and wife, as a result of the marriage law it did not exist. The judges' decision is retroactive to when the marriage took place.
Peran Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen dalam Pengawasan Klausula Baku di Kota Palembang Sri Turatmiyah; Arfianna Novera
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 24 No. 1: JANUARI 2017
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss1.art8

Abstract

This research studies the role of BPSK (Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen or Costumer's Conflict Resolution Board) in Palembang city in supervising the standard clause and any hindrances in that supervision. This research used the juridical-empirical research method supported by the regulatory approach and case approach. The result of the research showed that the role of BPSK in the supervision of inclusion of standard clause until recently is not applied well. This is due to BPSK simply waits for any complaints from customers and there is no any follow up from BPSK. Meanwhile, the hindrances in the supervision of standard clause are related to the absence of the regulation of implementation as amended in Article 52 letter (e) Law of Customer Protection. BPSK is not a judicial institution, and the operational cost of BPSK is burdened by local budget (APBD) coming from the customers, business actors and government that have a different culture.