Rahmi Jened
Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

KONFLIK YURISDIKSI DAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL DALAM RANGKA PASAR TUNGGAL Rahmi Jened
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 28, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (465.256 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16730

Abstract

AbstractIt is invisioned that ASEAN Single Market is to realize in 2015.ASEAN Single Market is what expected from the formation of ASEAN Economic community ( AEC). The basic principle of AEC is free movement of goods, services, personnel and capital. This is inherent with the objective of economic integration that is a fair competition. In relation to single market, there are trans boundary activities. It is highly possibility that international disputes over IP arise. Disputes that involve different countries with law of each their own and the need determination of choice of law /choice of forum or jurisdiction. This paper aims to discuss IP related conflict jurisdiction in the era of economic integration specifcally single market ASEANIntisariPada akhir 2015 diharapkan terwujud pasar tunggal ASEAN sebagai esensi perwujudan Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN (ASEAN Economic Community). Prinsip utama dalam rangka Economic Community adalah free movement of goods, services, skilled labours and capital. Prinsip ini inheren dengan tujuan utama integrasi ekonomi yakni persaingan sehat (fair competition). Persoalan HKI tidak hanya terbatas dalam suatu wilayah negara tertentu. Untuk itu perlu dianalisis masalah jurisdiksi pengadilan. Artikel ini akan membahas masalah konflik yurisdiksi dan penegakan HKI dalam rangka integrasi ekonomi dan pasar tunggal ASEAN.
Catatan Hukum Kritis Pembiayaan Sekunder Perumahan Rahmi Jened
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 31, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (412.778 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.33212

Abstract

Abstracthe existence of Secondary Mortgage Facility (SMF) in Indonesia is adopted from common law s tradition. It is not easy to adopt legal institutions derived from the common law tradition into our country that base on the civil law tradition. Furthermore, even though SMF has managed to solve mismatch and improve credit liquidity, hence there are some critical legal notes to SMF institution. This paper will discuss about the differences law and regulation of real property ownership, true sale for repurchase of loan and its   secured transaction (mortgage) and the existence of Special Purpose Vehicle between Common Law and civil Law tradition. IntisariEksistensi lembaga Fasilitas PembiayaanSekunder Perumahan (SMF) di Indonesia diadopsi dari common law system. Tentu bukan hal mudah untuk mengadopsi lembaga hukum dari tradisi common law ke dalam tradisi civil law. Meskipun telah terbukti lembaga ini dapat mengatasi mismatch dan meningkatkan likuiditas KPR, namun ada beberapa catatan hokum kritis tentang Pembiayaan Sekunder Perumahan.Makalah ini akan membahas perbedaan hokum dan aturan tentang kepemilikan tanah, jual putus untuk penjualan kredit dan hak tanggungannya serta eksistensi perusahaan kendaraan untuk tujuan khusus antara tradisi Common Law dan Civil Law.