p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Heart Science Journal
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Heart Science Journal

Correlation of Ischemic Time with Diastolic Dysfunction and Correlation of Diastolic Dysfunction with 6 Minute Walk Test Distance in STEMI Patients Receiving Percutaneus Coronary Intervention Imelda Krisnasari; Anna Fuji Rahimah; Mohammad Saifur Rohman; Setyasih Anjarwani; Indra Prasetya
Heart Science Journal Vol 3, No 2 (2022): Improving ST-Elevation Myocardial Infraction Patients Prognosis
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.hsj.2022.003.02.5

Abstract

Background: Minimizing the time between ischemia and reperfusion in STEMI patients is critical for salvaging ischemic myocardium and limiting residual injury. One of the methods for determining the impact of ischemic time on the myocardium and correlating the findings to the outcomes is by using echocardiography.Objectives: To evaluate the correlation of ischemic time to diastolic dysfunction and also the correlation of diastolic dysfunction to functional capacity by 6-minute walk distance in STEMI patients. Methods: The study was a retrospective cohort, with all STEMI patients who underwent PCI at RSUD Dr. Saiful Anwar Malang between January 2018 and November 2021 being eligible. All patients underwent PCI, echocardiography, and a 6-minute walk test before being discharged. We defined significant diastolic dysfunction as grade 2 or 3 diastolic dysfunction, according to the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) guidelines. The distance of 6-minute walk test was divided into three categories: less than 300m, 300-400m, and more than 400m.Results: From total 258 patients, 92 patients (35.7%) had significant diastolic dysfunction. The significant diastolic dysfunction was correlated with ischemic time > 12 hours (r = 0.51, p = 0.000), Killip class (r= 0.46, p = 0.000), culprit artery (r= 0.203, p=0,001), and peak toponin I levels (r=0.35, p=0.000). We identified that the ischemic time (odds ratio / OR 6.78; 95% Confidence Interval / CI 3.27 – 14.09; p  = 0.000), Killip class (odds ratio 4.62, 95% CI 2.53 to 8.48, p = 0.000), and infarct size by peak troponin I levels (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.18, p  = 0.000) as independent predictors of significant diastolic dysfunction. There was inversely correlation of diastolic dysfunction with 6-minute walk test distance. (r = -0,422 dan p=0,000), with E/e’ as independent predictors of level of 6 minute walk distance (OR -1.126, 95% CI -1.78 to -0.48, p = 0.001).Conclusion: Ischemic time is one of the independent predictors of significant diastolic dysfunction. LV diastolic dysfunction was inversely correlated with 6-minute walk test distance in STEMI patient.
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention as Clinical Outcome Predictor for in-Hospital Adverse Events in STEMI Patients Anita Surya Santoso; Mohammad Saifur Rohman; Ardian Rizal; Setyasih Anjarwani; Heny Martini; Indra Prasetya
Heart Science Journal Vol 3, No 2 (2022): Improving ST-Elevation Myocardial Infraction Patients Prognosis
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.hsj.2022.003.02.3

Abstract

Background : Limited resources and the concurrent COVID19 pandemic hinders the appropriate time to achieve reperfusion in Infarct-related artery (IRA). The number of patients receiving late primary PCI (PPCI) and without revascularization are steadily increase within 2 years into the pandemic. The impact of PCI timing in this setting has not been fully elucidated.Objective : This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of early PPCI vs late PPCI vs non revascularization groups towards in-hospital mortality and complications. This study also aimed to determine whether PPCI is the main predictor for in-hospital adverse events in STEMI patients.Method : Data of STEMI patients registered in Saiful Anwar General Hospiital ACS registry were collected between 2018-2021 Patients were subdivided into early PPCI if receiving PCI within the recommended time of the 2017 ESC STEMI management guideline, late PPCI if receiving PCI outside the timeframe provided by the guideline, and optimal medical therapy group if not receiving any means of revascularization. Patients undergoing thrombolysis were excluded. Afterwards, the incidence of in-hospital adverse event were calculated as primary endpoints, development of immediate complications during hospitalizations were analyzed as secondary endpoints. Stratification of baseline characteristics and PCI categorizations were performed using multivariate analysis to determine the main predictor of in-hospital mortality between STEMI patients.Results :  568 STEMI patients were included in the study with 387 in early PPCI, 107 in late PPCI, and 74 in optimal medical therapy group. Incidence of in-hospital mortality were significantly higher in optimal medical therapy group and lowest in early PPCI group (32.4% and 7.5% respectively, P 0.00). Mortality odds ratio between early PPCI group and optimal medical therapy group were significantly lowest (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.13 – 0.41). Complications between each treatment groups were significantly different with early PPCI had the lowest incidence of in-hospital complications of cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and VT/VF. Stratification of baseline characteristics and PCI category reveals that timing PPCI is the main predictor for in-hospital adverse events (HR 4.506, 95% CI 2.487-6.662, P 0.00). Conclusion : Percutaneous coronary intervention is the main predictor for the incidence of in hospital mortality and complications in STEMI patients.Keyword : STEMI, PCI, mortality, complications, in-hospital adverse events.
Diuretic Resistance in Advanced Heart Failure Anita Surya Santoso; Mohammad Saifur Rohman; Indra Prasetya; Budi Satrijo
Heart Science Journal Vol 2, No 1 (2021): How to Diagnose Heart Failure and Deal with The Treatment Complexity
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.hsj.2021.002.01.02

Abstract

Advanced heart failure (HF) is used to characterized patients in HF with severe symptoms, recurrent decompensation and severe cardiac dysfunction. The prevalencekof HFkis approximatelyg1-2% of thecadult population inhdeveloped countries and it will be rising more than 10%pamongapeoplec>70ayears of age, whereas estimated theoprevalence ofcpatients with advanced HF is about 1% until 10%cof thekoverallkHFopopulation. Most ofkthe HF hospitalizationssare due to signs and symptoms of fluidcoverload.Recurrent congestionccould worsen patientssoutcomes.Loopdiureticssare recommended for thectreatmentcofkcongestionqinprHF patient. cHowever,cdiureticvresistanceeispavcommon problem issueiinpacuteqdecompensationtofcadvancedochronicrheartwfailureq(ACHF) patients and established prognostic factor. Some early reports estimated the prevalence of diuretic resistance about 20%-30% in HF population. In this review, we will be discuss how to diagnose the advancedvheartufailurepand the underlying mechanism of diuretic resistancebin HF patients. We also describe pharmacologicalvand non-pharmacologicalstrategies to overcome this issue.
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Current Role of Diuretics and Ultrafiltration Dea Arie Kurniawan; Indra Prasetya; Sasmojo Widito; Heny Martini
Heart Science Journal Vol 4, No 1 (2023): Optimizing Outcome in Acute Cardiac Care
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.hsj.2023.004.01.2

Abstract

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) continues to be the leading cause of hospitalization and has a poor prognosis. Loop diuretic had been long used as cornerstone therapy for congestion and volume overload. However, several factors including diuretic resistance and declining renal function reduced the loop diuretic's effectiveness, necessitating a different treatment strategy. In ADHF, ultrafiltration (UF) could be a promising method to volume management. UF appears to be more effective at removing fluid than diuretics, according to several studies, with better quality of life and lower rehospitalization. This review highlights the current state of knowledge regarding the use of diuretics and UF in ADHF patients, as well as the challenges and questions raised associated with each approach.