Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

PERBANDINGAN ANTARA PRODUCTION SHARING CONTRACT COST RECOVERY DAN GROSS SPLIT DALAM USAHA HULU MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI DI INDONESIA Elisha Floriantina; Yudho Taruno Muryanto
Jurnal Privat Law Vol 9, No 1 (2021): Januari-Juni
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/privat.v9i1.29216

Abstract

AbstractThe upstream oil and gas business is one of the important natural resource management efforts in Indonesia. This is because Indonesia is one of the countries that have natural wealth in the form of oil and gas. For this reason, a good contract system is needed so that the management of upstream oil and gas can be carried out to get the maximum benefit. In 2017, Indonesia has changed its management system from cost recovery to gross split. In this article, the author will explain the comparison between the two systems. The type of research used is normative prescriptive. The approach used is the statute approach. The type of data used is secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The data collection technique used by the author is by literature review. Based on the results of the research and discussion conducted, it can be seen the differences and similarities in the cost recovery system and gross split. AbstrakUsaha hulu minyak dan gas bumi merupakan salah satu usaha pengelolaan sumber daya alam yang penting di Indonesia. Hal ini disebabkan karena Indonesia merupakan salah satu negara yang memiliki kekayaan alam berupa minyak dan gas bumi. Untuk itu diperlukan adanya sistem kontrak yang baik agar pengelolaan hulu migas dapat dilakukan untuk mendapatkan keuntungan semaksimal mungkin. Pada tahun 2017, Indonesia menggati sistem pengelolaannya dari cost recovery menjadi gross split. Pada artikel ini, Penulis akan menjelaskan perbandingan antara kedua sistem tersebut. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah normatif yang bersifat deskriptif. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan. Jenis data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan Penulis adalah dengan studi pustaka. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan yang dilakukan, dapat diketahui perbedaan dan persamaan sistem cost recovery dan gross split. 
TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERLINDUNGAN HAK CIPTA ATAS LAGU YANG DINYANYIKAN ULANG (COVER) UNTUK KEPENTINGAN KOMERSIAL DALAM MEDIA INTERNET BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA Muhammad Assegaf Purnomo Aji; YUDHO TARUNO MURYANTO
Jurnal Privat Law Vol 10, No 3 (2022): SEPTEMBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/privat.v10i3.42965

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to determine 1) Legal protection for copyright holders of songs that are re- sung (cover) for commercial purposes in the internet media based on Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. 2) Settlement of disputes over songs that are sung back (cover) for commercial  purposes in  the internet  media.  Based  on  the results of  research  and discussion concluded that: 1) Legal protection for copyright holders of songs that are re- sung (cover) for commercial purposes in the internet media based on law number 28 of 2014 concerning copyright is through preventive measures. Preventive measures include registration of  copyright, recording of  copyright contained in Act Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright Articles 95 - 99. 2) Settlement of disputes over songs that are re-sung for commercial purposes in the internet media is done through repressive measures . The repressive form of action as a dispute resolution for songs that are re-sung (cover) for commercial interests in the internet media is through court and arbitration.Keywords: Legal Protection; Song Copyright; Song CoverAbstrakTulisanini bertujuan untuk mengetahui 1) Perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang hak cipta terhadap lagu yang dinyanyikan ulang (cover) untuk kepentingan komersial dalam media internet berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. 2) Penyelesaian sengketa atas lagu yang dinyanyikan ulang (cover) untuk kepentingan komersial dalam media internet. Berdasarkan hasil tulisan dan pembahasan yang dilakukan diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa: 1) Perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang hak cipta terhadap lagu yang dinyanyikan ulang (cover) untuk kepentingan komersial dalam media internet berdasarkan undang-undang nomor 28 tahun 2014 tentang hak cipta adalah melalui tindakan preventif. Tindakan preventif meliputi pendaftaran hak cipta, pencatatan hak cipta yang dimuat dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 28 tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta Pasal 95 - 99. 2) Penyelesaian sengketa atas lagu yang dinyanyikan ulang (cover) untuk kepentingan komersial dalam media internet dilakukan melalui tindakan represif. Bentuk tindakan represif sebagai penyelesaian sengketa atas lagu  yang dinyanyikan ulang  (cover) untuk kepentingan komersial dalam media internet adalah melalui pengadilan dan arbitrase.Kata kunci : Perlindungan Hukum; Hak Cipta Lagu; Cover Lagu
Kesesuaian Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Kriteria Plagiarisme Undang – Undang No 28 Tahun 2014 (Analisis Putusan Nomor 31/ PDT.SUS-HAK CIPTA /2020/ PN.JKT.PST) Reza Fauzia Hanum; Yudho Taruno Muryanto
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Maret : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v1i1.82

Abstract

This study aims to determine the criteria for plagiarism of fine arts according to Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. In addition, it also seeks to determine the basis for the judge's consideration in Decision Number 31 / Pdt.Sus-Copyright / 2020 / Pn.Jkt.Pst. In this study, normative legal research was prescriptive. Normative is prescriptive, namely, examining library materials indicated in written regulations. The approaches used in writing this law are the case and statutory approaches. The results of this research, according to Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, the criteria for plagiarism of works of fine art are if they meet the elements of 1) the existence of similarities in whole or in part that are substantial, 2) the recognition of private property to imitation works and 3) cause losses to the creator of imitation of works. In the judge's consideration in deciding the alleged case of plagiarism, the judge should take into account the following: 1) Proving the similarity between Love Light and Urban Light; 2) There is a loss incurred by the Plaintiff. In this case, the judge's consideration is based on the regulations of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning copyright, and the plaintiff can also prove all of them so that the defendant is found guilty.
Tanggung Jawab Penerbit dan Manajer Investasi Terhadap Kasus Gagal Bayar (Default) Dana Investasi Reksadana Yang Dialami Investor : Studi Kasus PT. Tridomain Performance Materials Tbk Juan Dicky A. Sukatendel; Yudho Taruno Muryanto
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Maret : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v1i1.116

Abstract

The capital market is an important part of representing the country's economic conditions. In the capital market there are several instruments that are traded, one of which is mutual funds. Mutual funds are quite an attractive option for the community, but there are cases of default that make mutual fund investors suffer losses. This research uses a normative juridical approach method, namely library legal research conducted by examining library materials or secondary data as a basis for research by conducting a search for laws and literature related to the problems studied. Legal protection can be done by using preventive and repressive legal protection in mutual fund investment cases as a form of protection to investors from the government. The losses suffered by investors due to the default of PT TDPM to MMI, indicate that TDPM has a responsibility that can be in the form of paying all obligations and compensation and accepting all sanctions that can be in the form of administrative, civil, to criminal. Preventive legal protection can be seen in the existence of laws and regulations such as the Capital Market Law, P2SK Law, POJK 48/2015, POJK 31/2015, and others. Repressive legal protection is in the form of enforcement of sanctions from administrative even to bankruptcy. Responsibility must be carried out by TDPM, namely paying obligations along with interest according to the debt restructuring agreement until the imposition of sanctions. And it is necessary to see the form of MMI's responsibility as the Investment Manager in this case.