Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Risalah Hukum

Konsep Cyber Attack, Cyber Crime, Dan Cyber Warfare Dalam Aspek Hukum Internasional Miko Aditiya Suharto; Maria Novita Apriyani
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 17, Nomor 2, Desember 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v17i2.705

Abstract

The movement of human activities initially carried out conventionally turned into digital. This phenomenon also applies to the flow of information traffic. Information that was previously disseminated conventionally has become digitalized. Once the exchange of information and activities on the Internet is so widespread, it is as if the Internet is a world of its own with no boundaries. As a new dimension like land, sea, air, and space, Cyber space also has many problems related to the misuse of computer and internet technology for purposes that deviate from legal norms to the detriment of other parties. The implications of Cyber attacks have destructive properties such as changing, disrupting, closing access, reducing performance, or damaging computer files, computer networks, or the computer itself when associated with the rights of someone in the use of computer technology. This study uses normative research using a conceptual approach, a comparative approach, and a statutory approach. The results of this study are that the concepts and elements of cyber attack, cyber crime, and cyber warfare have differences. Cyberattack is a method used to carry out attacks using computer technology and the Internet. Cyber crime is a form of crime committed by utilizing computer and internet technology in carrying out crimes. Meanwhile, cyber warfare is a form of cyber operations (cyber operations) in an attack or defense, which is carried out to cause injury or death to people or damage or destruction of the target object or target operation.
Kapasitas Pemerintahan Afghanistan Rezim Taliban Baru Sebagai Peserta Dalam Perjanjian Internasional Miko Aditiya Suharto; Maria Novita Apriyani
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Vol 18 No 1 (2022): Volume 18, Nomor 1, Juni 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v18i1.818

Abstract

The decision by the United States and NATO to withdraw troops from Afghanistan is a golden opportunity for the ultraconservative political factions (Taliban) to take back their control of Afghanistan. This military invasion by the United States and NATO has caused a humanitarian tragedy and an extraordinary humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan since 2001 ago. The Taliban took control of the government in Afghanistan after the United States and NATO withdrew their troops from Chief Ashraf Ghani. This article is a legal scientific article that has been normatively researched, the approaches used in writing this article include the statutory approach and case studies (not a case approach). This article discusses the legitimacy of the occupation of the Afghan government by the Taliban regime, as well as the legal consequences that arise from international agreements that have been made and run from the previous government regime. Conclusion This Scientific Article states that the Status of the Government of Afghanistan by the Taliban is a Succession of Government and is legal under international law and the impact of this succession makes the current Regime Government a Successor of the previous government, so that the Rights & Obligations of the existing International Agreements remain binding on the State of Afghanistan even though it has been change government regime. Keywords: succession, taliban regime, afghanistan, international law
Konsep Cyber Attack, Cyber Crime, Dan Cyber Warfare Dalam Aspek Hukum Internasional Miko Aditiya Suharto; Maria Novita Apriyani
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 17, Nomor 2, Desember 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v17i2.705

Abstract

The movement of human activities initially carried out conventionally turned into digital. This phenomenon also applies to the flow of information traffic. Information that was previously disseminated conventionally has become digitalized. Once the exchange of information and activities on the Internet is so widespread, it is as if the Internet is a world of its own with no boundaries. As a new dimension like land, sea, air, and space, Cyber space also has many problems related to the misuse of computer and internet technology for purposes that deviate from legal norms to the detriment of other parties. The implications of Cyber attacks have destructive properties such as changing, disrupting, closing access, reducing performance, or damaging computer files, computer networks, or the computer itself when associated with the rights of someone in the use of computer technology. This study uses normative research using a conceptual approach, a comparative approach, and a statutory approach. The results of this study are that the concepts and elements of cyber attack, cyber crime, and cyber warfare have differences. Cyberattack is a method used to carry out attacks using computer technology and the Internet. Cyber crime is a form of crime committed by utilizing computer and internet technology in carrying out crimes. Meanwhile, cyber warfare is a form of cyber operations (cyber operations) in an attack or defense, which is carried out to cause injury or death to people or damage or destruction of the target object or target operation.
Kapasitas Pemerintahan Afghanistan Rezim Taliban Baru sebagai Peserta dalam Perjanjian Internasional Miko Aditiya Suharto; Maria Novita Apriyani
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Vol 18 No 1 (2022): Volume 18, Nomor 1, Juni 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v18i1.818

Abstract

The decision by the United States and NATO to withdraw troops from Afghanistan is a golden opportunity for the ultraconservative political factions (Taliban) to take back their control of Afghanistan. This military invasion by the United States and NATO has caused a humanitarian tragedy and an extraordinary humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan since 2001 ago. The Taliban took control of the government in Afghanistan after the United States and NATO withdrew their troops from Chief Ashraf Ghani. This article is a legal scientific article that has been normatively researched, the approaches used in writing this article include the statutory approach and case studies (not a case approach). This article discusses the legitimacy of the occupation of the Afghan government by the Taliban regime, as well as the legal consequences that arise from international agreements that have been made and run from the previous government regime. Conclusion This Scientific Article states that the Status of the Government of Afghanistan by the Taliban is a Succession of Government and is legal under international law and the impact of this succession makes the current Regime Government a Successor of the previous government, so that the Rights & Obligations of the existing International Agreements remain binding on the State of Afghanistan even though it has been change government regime. Keywords: succession, taliban regime, afghanistan, international law