Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik
Faiza Nisrina
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara

 1 
Legalitas Alat Bukti Elektronik dari Hasil Penyadapan dalam Proses Peradilan: ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Pidana Alvieta Alice Reyhanif; Faiza Nisrina
Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Juni : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/birokrasi.v2i2.1232

Abstract

In the ever-evolving digital era, information technology has affected various aspects of life, including law enforcement. One important impact is the use of electronic evidence, including wiretap results, in the criminal justice process. Electronic evidence has a crucial role in detecting and proving various criminal acts such as organized crime, corruption, and terrorism. However, the use of wiretap results as evidence often raises debates regarding its legality and validity, especially in the context of potential violations of human rights such as the right to privacy and freedom of communication. In Indonesia, the legality of electronic evidence is regulated in various laws such as the ITE Law and laws that authorize the KPK to conduct wiretapping. This research aims to analyze the legal position and legality of electronic evidence from wiretapping results in the criminal justice process in Indonesia and its implications for the principles of criminal procedure law. The research method used is normative juridical by conducting a literature study. The results showed that although electronic evidence has been substantially recognized, its regulation in the context of procedural law is still not entirely clear. Therefore, more comprehensive and transparent regulations are needed to ensure the realization of a fair judicial process and the protection of human rights.
Co-Authors Alvieta Alice Reyhanif Ania Nasyira Aqila Husna Muhammad Aldo Savero Roselia Ariyanti