Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary
Wijaya, Niko
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia

 1 
Problems and Legal Protection of Art Works in Non-Fungible Token (NTF) Practices Wijaya, Niko; Urbaniasi, Urbaniasi
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol 2, No 2 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v2i2.904

Abstract

This article analyzes the Non-Fungible Token, abbreviated NFT, which is a digital certificate that can be used to verify who owns certain assets in the world of crypto art, where this certificate represents ownership of authentic works of art. Non-Fungible Token (NFT) as a digital asset as well as several legal issues that arise related to NFTs, especially in the field of intellectual property law including copyright protection and legal construction of copyright ownership of NFTs. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach. This study aims to find out how the legal problems in the practice of intellectual property development commercialization of non-fungible tokens (NFT) and how to protect works of art in the form of Indonesian non-fungible tokens (NFT). The results of this study indicate that although in Indonesia there are no specific regulations that explicitly regulate Non-Fungible Tokens (NFT), the rights of creators of works are generally protected by Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, but from an intellectual point of view property development, NFT presents the potential for the development and commercialization of works through digital media that has a wide reach and provides more optimal monetization opportunities.
Analysis of the Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Against Rachmawati Soekarno in Decision Number 305 K/PDT. SUS-HKI/2014 Wijaya, Niko; Lie, Gunardi; Putra, Moody Rizqy Syailendra
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol 3, No 1 (2024): June 2024
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v3i1.2336

Abstract

Basically, the meaning of the film itself can be said to be a mass communication medium where the content can be related to vital ideas which of course are aimed at the audience and also carry a message. This is the meaning of the film as a work of cultural art being displayed. Therefore, it can be said that the film itself has several functions as a driver of creative work, an educational function and also an informational function. It can be said that because the function of this film is diverse, the function of the film is not only limited to entertainment. The holder of the economic rights or moral rights of the disputed Soekarno film script is Rahmawati but apparently her name was not included so that Rahmawati filed a lawsuit at the court in Central Jakarta against PT Multivisionfus and director Hanung Bramantyo that the basis of the lawsuit was copyright infringement of the copyright in Soekarno, created and directed by Hanung Bramantyo. In the first instance, the lawsuit filed by Rahmawati was explained in the decision of the Central Jakarta District Court that the lawsuit was granted and considered that there were indications of copyright infringement by not including Rahmawati's name and Soekarno's film script, which was committed by Multivision Plus. However, because the defendant did not agree with the decision given by the Central Jakarta court, a cassation was submitted to the supreme court and in the end the appeal was accepted by the supreme court and stated that the figure Soekarno was not someone's creation, but was a real figure who actually lived. and finally died.
Co-Authors Lie, Gunardi Putra, Moody Rizqy Syailendra Urbaniasi, Urbaniasi