USU LAW JOURNAL
Vol 6, No 6 (2018)

PENERAPAN SISTEM PEMBUKTIAN OLEH HAKIM DALAM PROSES PEMERIKSAAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG

Yona Lamerossa Ketaren (Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara)
Bismar Nasution (Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara)
Mahmud Mulyadi (Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara)
Madiasa Ablisar (Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara)



Article Info

Publish Date
31 Dec 2018

Abstract

ABSTRACT The proceedings of money laundering actors initially place the proceeds of crime into a financial service provider such as a bank, then transfer between different accounts, and spend money on proceeds of crime to purchase goods. The most important principles in the proof of money laundering crime are the presumption of innocence to prove the defendant's crime and reverse proof. The application of a reversed verification system for criminal acts of money laundering in court is not applied independently to blame the defendant or his assets / assets involved in money laundering. The money laundering law still requires sufficient evidences to be required, which means that a minimum of two valid evidences are required. The obligation of the accused to prove that pursuant to Article 77 of the Money Laundering Law related to the element of "knowing" or "to be expected" is an additional requirement for the judge in bringing the verdict.   Keywords  : Evidence; Money Laundering; and Implementation of Proof Reversed.

Copyrights © 2018