International Journal of Law Reconstruction
Vol 3, No 1 (2019): INTERNASIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW RECONSTRUCTION

DISPUTE INTERNATIONAL BETWEEN INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA SEIZE ON SIPADAN AND LINGITAN ISLAND

Nur Fareha Binti Mohammad Zukri (International Student of Sultan Agung Islamic University Semarang)
Ong Argo Victoria (International Islamic University Malaysia)
Fadli Eko Apriliyanto (Sultan Agung Islamic University Semarang)



Article Info

Publish Date
23 Jun 2019

Abstract

In 1998 the issue of Sipadan and Ligitan dispute brought to the ICJ, later in the day Tuesday, December 17, 2002 ICJ issued a decision on the sovereignty dispute case of Sipadan-Ligatan between Indonesia and Malaysia. As a result, in the voting at the institution, Malaysia won by 16 judges, while only one person who sided with Indonesia. Of the 17 judges, 15 are permanent judges of MI, while one judge is an option Malaysia and another selected by Indonesia. Victory Malaysia, therefore under consideration effectivity (Without deciding on the question of territorial waters and maritime boundaries), the British (colonizers Malaysia) has made a real administrative action in the form of the issuance of bird wildlife protection ordinance, a tax levied against turtle egg collection since 1930, and the operation of the lighthouse since the 1960s an. Meanwhile, Malaysia's tourism activities do not be a consideration, as well as the refusal is based on chain of title (a proprietary suite of Sultan of Sulu) but failed to demarcate the sea border between Malaysia and Indonesia in Makassar strait.

Copyrights © 2019






Journal Info

Abbrev

lawreconstruction

Publisher

Subject

Other

Description

FOCUS The focus of International Journal of Law Reconstruction (IJLR) is to provide scientific Law article based on themes that developed in attendance through the article publications, research reports, and book reviews. SCOPE International Journal of Law Reconstruction (IJLR) specializing in the ...