ODONTO Dental Journal
Vol 7, No 2 (2020): December 2020

MICROHARDNESS DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SILK FIBER AS A NATURAL FILLER COMPOSITE RESIN WITH NANOFILLER COMPOSITE RESIN

Sartika Puspita (Dental School, UMY)
Romadhon Yuan Aziz (Rumah Sakit Gigi dan Mulut Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta)
Dwi Aji Nugroho (Departemen Dental Material Program Studi Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta)



Article Info

Publish Date
17 Dec 2020

Abstract

Background: Dental composite composed of natural filler is a trend nowadays. Silk fiber, Bombyx mori L., is one of the natural fibers that have good microhardness (66 VHN) and has a potency to become a renewable natural filler. This research aimed to determine microhardness differences of silk fiber composite B. mori L., and nanofiller composite resin as a gold standard.Method: A quasi-experimental laboratory using composite resin with silk fiber B. mori L., as a natural filler; nanofiller composite Z350 XT flowable (3M ESPE, USA) as a positive control and no-filler composite as a negative control. Four cylindrical specimens per group were made (d=3mm, h=6mm). Microhardness tests were done with Vickers hardness tester (Shimadzu, Japan). Indentation of 100 grams for 20 seconds.Result: There were significant differences in the natural filler, nanofiller group (positive) control and no-filler composite (negative control). Based on the Kruskal Wallis test result, there was a significant difference in microhardness (p=0.024). The highest microhardness was nanofiller (115,2 VHN), silk fiber filler (109,4 VHN), and no-filler composite (32,2 VHN).Conclusion: Silk fiber Bombyx mori L., has shown the good potential of being a renewable natural filler (109,4 VHN) however lower than nanofiller composites.

Copyrights © 2020