<![CDATA[Asphalt Concrete Wearing Course (AC-WC) resurfacing work in the cost planning stage needs to be done properly and thoroughly so as not to suffer a loss because this project is a construction project that is done repeatedly every year. In planning the Work Unit Price Analysis estimator refers to the PUPR Guidelines 2016 and the planning of the preparation of bid prices from previous years. It's just in every method of planning will experience changes due to adjustment of conditions in the actual. This research discusses whether both Unit Price Analysis planning methods have cost efficiency against unit prices in the actual or not. This research was conducted by observing and collecting data directly, in the form of processing the operating time of heavy equipment used, namely: Dump Truck, Asphalt Finisher, Tandem and Tire Roller and this research analyzed by processing the value of the unit price coefficient in accordance with the calculation of PUPR guidelines 2016 and offers. Then a comparative analysis was conducted between Unit Price Analysis planning and the actual. The results showed that the Unit Price Analysis planning bid method experienced a cost efficiency of 6.4% against Unit Price Analysis in actual and planning with the PUPR guidelines 28/2016 experienced an efficiency of 8.25% against Unit Price Analysis in the actual. So, it has the possibility that with both planning methods still provide an advantage for estimators with the efficiency of the unit price coefficient value of the actual approach. Keywords: AC-WC, Actual Unit Price Analysis, Unit Price Analysis Offers, PUPR 2016 Guidelines.]]>
Copyrights © 2021
