KEUDA : JURNAL KAJIAN EKONOMI DAN KEUANGAN DAERAH
Vol 7, No 1 (2022)

Menilai Pemberian Opini Wajar Tanpa Pengecualian Atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah

Agustinus Salle (Unknown)
Hesty Theresia Salle (Universitas Cenderawasih)
Klara Wonar (Unknown)



Article Info

Publish Date
10 May 2022

Abstract

This study seeks to investigate and exemplify the enhanced unqualified opinion of Indonesia's Regional Government Financial Reports. The increased number of unqualified opinions is distrustful due to widespread misusage of local government budgets. The research used the Semester Examination Results Overview (IHPS) published by the BPK as the data source. We assume that BPK's provide unqualified opinion according to the criteria: conformity of financial reports with Government Accounting Standards, the use of sound Internal Control Systems, the compliance to the laws and regulations, and the follow-up of the auditors' recommendations. The findings reveal that the unqualified opinions prove for some reasons, but some actualities do not support the opinions.

Copyrights © 2022






Journal Info

Abbrev

KEUDA

Publisher

Subject

Economics, Econometrics & Finance

Description

Topik Keuda berkaitan dengan aspek apapun dari Keuangan Daerah dan Kajian Ekonomi, termasuk namun tidak terbatas pada topik berikut: 1. Akuntansi Sektor Publik 2. Akuntansi Manajemen 3. Ekonomi ...