Bali Dermatology Venereology and Aesthetic Journal
BDVJ - Vol. 3 No. 2 (December 2020)

Focus on the dabrafenib, vemurafenib, and trametinib in the clinical outcome of melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ida Ayu Widya Anjani (Undergraduate Student, Medical Faculty of Universitas Udayana, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia)
Anak Agung Bagus Putra Indrakusuma (Undergraduate Student, Medical Faculty of Universitas Udayana, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia)
I Gede Krisna Arim Sadeva (Undergraduate Student, Medical Faculty of Universitas Udayana, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia)
Putri Ayu Wulandari (Undergraduate Student, Medical Faculty of Universitas Udayana, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia)
Luh Made Mas Rusyanti (Department of Dermatovenereology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana/Sanglah General Hospital, Bali)
Prima Sanjiwani Saraswati Sudarsa (Department of Dermatovenereology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana/Sanglah General Hospital, Bali)
I Gede Putu Supadmanaba (Biochemistry Department Medical Faculty of Universitas Udayana
Master Student of Master Oncology Program, Faculty of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Research Internship in Medical Oncology Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam/Cancer Ce)

Desak Made Wihandani (Biochemistry Department Medical Faculty of Universitas Udayana)



Article Info

Publish Date
15 Dec 2020

Abstract

Background: Melanoma is the most severe lethal skin cancer, affecting melanin producer cells (melanocytes). Surgery is the most common treatment, whereas, for the advanced stage, the development of treatment is recommended. BRAF (Dabrafenib and Vemurafenib) inhibitor or MEK inhibitor (Trametinib) is the most frequently targeted melanoma therapy due to more than 80% of patients with positive BRAF mutation. In this review, those treatments will be investigated systematically to identify their clinical outcome. Method: This systematic literature review (SLR) was performed from Cochrane, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Pubmed. Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool RoB2 is used to assess RCT studies and New-castle Ottawa Scale Assessment to assess cohort studies by three different assessors. Data analysis was carried out by using Review Manager (RevMan 5.4). Heterogenicity test was assessed by I2 and Chi2 statistic Result: There are 20 studies used in this article (13 RCT and seven cohorts). The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the survey that using targeted therapy (vemurafenib, trametinib, or dabrafenib) compare other treatments (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, etc.) showed risk ratio (RR) was 1.12 (95%CI 1.07,1.17; I2=100%; p<0,00001). The OS and PFS with monotherapy compare of vemurafenib, trametinib, or dabrafenib with combination therapy showed RR was 1.09 (95%CI.06,1.13; I2=99%; p<0,00001). Conclusion: BRAF and MEK targeted therapy has a good prognosis for a patient with a positive BRAF gene mutation and could be combined with other treatments for better clinical outcomes rather than monotherapy.

Copyrights © 2020






Journal Info

Abbrev

balidv

Publisher

Subject

Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health

Description

Bali Dermatology Venereology and Aesthetic Journal is an open access; peer-reviewed journal aiming to communicate high-quality research articles, reviews, and general articles in the Dermatology, Venereology and Aesthetic field. The Journal aims to bridge and integrate the intellectual, ...