cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum
ISSN : 25287273     EISSN : 25409034     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum (JBMH) adalah jurnal ilmu hukum yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, terbit secara berkala setiap tahunnya pada bulan Maret dan September. Artikel yang dimuat pada Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum adalah artikel Ilmiah yang berisi tulisan dari hasil penelitian dan kajian analitis kritis di bidang hukum.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 4 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 8 Nomor 1 September 2023" : 4 Documents clear
THE STATUS OF FOREIGN ARBITRATORS UNDER INDONESIAN LAWS Huala Adolf
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 8 Nomor 1 September 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jbmh.v8i1.1120

Abstract

Foreign arbitrators in Indonesia have never been questioned before with regard to their status or legality. The main aim of this article was to analyze the status of foreign arbitrators in the light of the recent Supreme Court of Indonesia’s decision on the PT. Timas Suplindo case (2017). The method used in this article was descriptive-normative of the subject analyzed supported by the case-law, in particular the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia concerning the issue of foreign arbitrator. This article concluded, while there is an absence of regulation concerning the status of foreign arbitrator in Indonesia, the parties should include and state the legality of the foreign arbitrator in their arbitration clause. This article also recommended, the Arbitration Law should be supplemented with the provision on the status of foreign arbitrator in the future amendment of the Law.
CRIMINAL LAW POLICY IN BLASPHEMY ENFORCEMENT BASED ON RESTORATIVE JUSTICE Rudi Natamiharja; Heni Siswanto; Desia Rakhma Banjarani; Ikhsan Setiawan
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 8 Nomor 1 September 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jbmh.v8i1.1178

Abstract

Policies for resolving religious blasphemy in Indonesia are regulated in Law Number 1/PNPS/1965 concerning the Prevention of Blasphemy of Religion and Article 156a of the Criminal Code. Sentences are often repressive and do not fulfill the value of justice. The formulation of the problem in this article is: what is the criminal law policy in the settlement of blasphemy and what kind of settlement model is chosen to handle the case. This research method is normative legal research with a statutory approach based on primary legal materials. The research results show that the imposition of punishment is the main solution. Meanwhile, the model chosen in the resolution of defamation of freedom of expression according to the concept of restorative justice uses an integrated approach that tries to implement penal and non-penal efforts simultaneously to fulfill justice for the perpetrators of defamation, including involving the role of the community through the Religious Communication Forum (FKUB). Suggestions that need to be conveyed are that criminal law policies are still being implemented, but harsh criminal sanctions are softened by using the concept of restorative justice, bearing in mind that not every case of blasphemy deserves a harsh sentence.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BEST INTERESTS PRINCIPLE FOR CHILDREN WHO COMMIT VIOLENT CRIMES RESULTING IN THE DEATH OF CHILDREN (STUDY IN THE CENTRAL JAKARTA DISTRICT COURT) Rahman Amin; Muh. Fikri Al Aziz
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 8 Nomor 1 September 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jbmh.v8i1.1019

Abstract

Children are the future generations of the nation and state, and it is essential that they receive protection to ensure their growth into fully developed human beings. However, in today's society, many children become entangled with the law, go through legal processes, and even face criminal sentences, where the principle of the best interests of the child is not yet the primary consideration for law enforcement authorities in handling cases involving children. This situation can have negative effects on a child's development. This study is a normative-empirical legal research with a legislative and case-based approach. The research findings indicate that the implementation of the best interests principle for children who commit violent crimes resulting in the death of children (a study conducted in the Central Jakarta District Court) is not yet optimally realized. During the legal proceedings, investigators and prosecutors still detain children, imprisonment remains the prosecutor's choice in the indictment, and during the trial, judges still opt for primary imprisonment as a punishment, even though there are alternative forms of sanctions such as rehabilitation, either within or outside institutions, which could be imposed on children, considering the conditions they are currently experiencing for their future well-being and development.
IMPLEMENTATION OF A JUDGE'S DECISION REGARDING THE EVIDENCE STATUS IN CRIMINAL CASES RELATED TO BANKRUPTCY CONFISCATION Elis Rusmiati
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 8 Nomor 1 September 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jbmh.v8i1.1446

Abstract

This article discusses criminal acts with the characteristics of a large number of victims and losses, one of which is the case of PT First Travel and Abu Tour with the same motive and article being charged. For the purposes of examining criminal cases since the preliminary examination stage, the process of confiscating evidence has been carried out, including goods which are the object of a crime, proceeds of a crime and other goods related to a crime, including goods in bankruptcy confiscation. The issues discussed are the application of the status of evidence in criminal cases related to bankruptcy confiscated goods in a judge's decision and efforts to return evidence in meeting the victim's loss due to a crime. Using the normative juridical research method, it was concluded that the consideration of judges, which is one of the most important aspects in determining the realization of the value of a judge's decision, was not carried out carefully and thoroughly, one of which was in decisions 3096 K/Pid.Sus/2018 and 3127 K/PID.SUS/2019 which makes no sense at all. Efforts are needed to return the confiscated evidence from the victim to overcome the losses suffered, in several ways, namely improving the search and filing administration system for evidence subject to confiscation from the investigation stage so that the case files at the prosecutor's office are included if there is already a bankruptcy confiscation.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4


Filter by Year

2023 2023


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 8 Nomor 1 September 2023 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 7 Number 2 Maret 2023 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 7 Nomor 1 September 2022 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 6 Nomor 2 Maret 2022 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 6 Nomor 1 September 2021 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 5 Nomor 2 Maret 2021 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 5 Nomor 1 September 2020 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 4 Nomor 2 Maret 2020 Vol 4, No 2 (2020): VOL 4, NO 2 (2020): JURNAL BINA MULIA HUKUM Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 4 Nomor 1 September 2019 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 3 Nomor 2 Maret 2019 Vol 4, No 1 (2019): JURNAL BINA MULIA HUKUM Vol 3, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 3 Nomor 1 September 2018 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 2 Nomor 2 Maret 2018 Vol 3, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 2 Nomor 1 September 2017 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 1 Nomor 2 Maret 2017 Vol 2, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2016): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 1 Nomor 1 September 2016 Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum More Issue