cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Mochammad Zaka Adiansyah
Contact Email
islamikainside@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
manager@islamikainside.iain-jember.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. jember,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
ISSN : 24769541     EISSN : 25808885     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Art, Social,
Arts Humanities Social Sciences
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 3 No 2 (2017): DESEMBER" : 6 Documents clear
Relasi Pemikiran Nabia Abbott dan Ignaz Goldziher dalam Studi Ḥadīth Muawanah, Arofatul
Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Vol 3 No 2 (2017): DESEMBER
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Humaniora Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (346.07 KB) | DOI: 10.35719/islamikainside.v3i2.41

Abstract

Among the Orientalists, who have different ideas, are Ignaz Goldziher and Nabia Abbott. In his study, Goldziher always show a sharp criticism of the scientific construction of ḥadīth and his views on ḥadīth have been always dissimilar with scholars of ḥadīth. He also alleges that the existence of ḥadīth is no longer original. Abbott’s thought of ḥadīth, in contrast, tends to be moderate. Broadly speaking, Abbott’s views seem to reinforce the thought of ‘ulamā’ al-ḥadīth. Abbott even acknowledges that the compilation of ḥadīth has existed since the Prophet Muhammad’s lifetime. In this context, it is interesting to note that Goldziher and Abbott are equally orientalists who employ the Western paradigm in examining ḥadīth. The question is whether there is a relationship of thought between the two. Using descriptive and analytical methods this article specifically traces and explores the relationship of Abbott and Goldziher’s thoughts. The study aims to determine the extent to which the relation of thought between the two Orientalists and the factors affect the similarity of thought between them.
Kritik atas Kritik Kamaruddin Amin terhadap Riwayat Mudallisīn dalam Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī dan Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim Syukrillah, M.
Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Vol 3 No 2 (2017): DESEMBER
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Humaniora Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (452.559 KB) | DOI: 10.35719/islamikainside.v3i2.42

Abstract

This research is prompted by the thought of Kamaruddin Amin who challenges the concept of ‘Ulūm al-Ḥadīth about the transmission of mudallisīn in the Ṣahīḥ al-Bukhārī and Ṣahīḥ Muslīm. The article finds that: first, there have been inconsistencies and gaps between the theory and practice in the concept of tadlīs; second, there are negative implications of application of tadlīs according to ‘Ulūm al-Ḥadīth against the transmission of mudallisīn; third, Ṣīghat al-Taḥammul wa al-Adā’ has no significance either in the study of ḥadīth authentication in general or in the context of tadlīs in particular; fourth, Nāsir al-Dīn al-Albānī’s method of determining the authenticity of mudallas ḥadīth has a weakness and negative implications upon mudallas ḥadīths in general; fifth, the application of mudallas ḥadīth criticism according to the traditional method using al-jarḥ muqaddam ‘alā al-ta‘dīl idhā kānā mufassaran when the controversy occurs in the assessment of the predicate of a ḥadīth; and sixth, orientalist’s method of giving the calendar to the ḥadīth can be used as an alternative way to overcome the weaknesses of the method of classical ḥadīth science.
Analisis Metode Pemahaman Ḥadīth Muḥammad Shaḥrūr dalam Kitab al-Sunnah al-Rasūlīyah wa al-Sunnah al-Nabawīyah Arifin, Syamsul
Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Vol 3 No 2 (2017): DESEMBER
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Humaniora Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (504.963 KB) | DOI: 10.35719/islamikainside.v3i2.43

Abstract

This article specifically discusses the method and typology of understanding of the ḥadīth held by Muḥammad Shaḥrūr in his work al-Sunnah al-Rasūlīyah wa al-Sunnah al-Nabawīyah. The results reveal that Shaḥrūr offers a number of stages in understanding ḥadīth, are: first, understanding ḥadīth not as a divine revelation. Second, understanding ḥadīth according to the principles of al-tanzīl al-ḥakīm. Third, distinguishing the role of the Prophet Muhammad as an ordinary man, a prophet, and an apostle. Fourth, collecting ḥadīths which are meaningful or still in one theme. Fifth, testing ḥadīth with ratio, healthy logic, and science. Sixth, testing ḥadīth with the historical fact, and seventh, distinguishing the unseen and the seen. Furthermore, the typology of the understanding hadis of Shahrur in his book can be classified into a moderate-reformist school. This is because he invites Muslims to reconstruct the understanding of ḥadīth contextually.
Kritik atas Penelitian Nāṣir al-Dīn al-Albānī terhadap Ḥadīth yang Dinilai Ḍa‘īf dalam al-Jāmi‘ al-Ṣaḥīḥ Karya Muslim b. Ḥajjāj al-Naysābūrī Syaifuddin Rizal, Fahmi Ali
Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Vol 3 No 2 (2017): DESEMBER
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Humaniora Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (572.492 KB) | DOI: 10.35719/islamikainside.v3i2.59

Abstract

This article tries to re-read the results of research conducted by Muḥammad Nāṣir al-Dīn al-Albānī against the ḥadīths in al-Jāmi‘ al-Ṣaḥīḥ by Muslim b. al-Ḥajāj al-Naysābūrī. He has considered weak (ḍa‘īf) against the twenty hadith contained in the al-Jāmi‘ al-Ṣaḥīḥ either due to problems related to the integrity and credibility of the narrator in the course of his treasures (sanad) as well as concerning the authenticity problem of hadith texts (matn). The results of the study show that his research contains many errors due to the lack of careful understanding of the pronunciations used by the ḥadīth critics when conducting a review of the abovementioned narrative. In addition, al-Albānī also lacked the extra attention in analyzing the status of the narrators assessed jarḥ and ta‘dīl, so erroneously in concluding the status of narrator. It seems, he does not understand the difference of pronunciation of the ḥadīth, ignores the sharḥ of the ḥadīth, and ignores the other hadiths as a comparison in conducting research.
Analisis Framing Murray Edelman dalam Periwayatan Ḥadīth bi al-Ma‘nā Rohmatullah, Ahmad
Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Vol 3 No 2 (2017): DESEMBER
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Humaniora Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (481.598 KB) | DOI: 10.35719/islamikainside.v3i2.60

Abstract

This article analyzes the model of narration of ḥadīth with meaning (bi al-ma‘nā) in the perspective of framing analysis according to Murray Edelman. Analysis of framing is relevant to be applied to historical ḥadīth with meaning (bi al-ma‘nā), where the ḥadīth is information on the events of the Prophet Muhammad which were witnessed by various sentences and words. The concept of framing analysis is closely related to information about an event that is presented with a different editor and a different visual side. This editorial and visual diversity fosters scientific assumptions which then develop into a concept of framing analysis. The variety of traditions of the ḥadīth narrated meaningfully is a result of the process of categorization and construction among the narrators of the ḥadīth. Even though it is not a determinant factor, the riwāyat bi al-ma‘nā tradition shows a different process of categories and constructs among the narrators of the ḥadīth. The event is the same but expressed in a series of different sentences, or different words.
Telaah Komparatif Metode Kritik Ḥadīth Sunnī ala Muḥammad al-Ghazālī dan Abū Ja‘far Muḥammad b. Ya‘qūb al-Kulaynī ala Shī‘ah Busairi, Busairi
Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Vol 3 No 2 (2017): DESEMBER
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Humaniora Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (549.212 KB) | DOI: 10.35719/islamikainside.v3i2.62

Abstract

This article analyzes the method of criticizing the ḥadīth offered by Muḥammad al-Ghazālī from Sunnī school and Abū Ja‘far Muḥammad b. Ya‘qūb al-Kulaynī from Shi‘ite school. The focus of the problem in this study is the difference in the qualifications of hadiths between Sunnī and Shi‘ite schools which are the two largest Islamic schools which always have a theological and political contradiction between the two. From these two figures, it can be concluded that there is an equal method of criticism, which is located in the narrator must be ḍābit and thiqqah. Besides that there are also differences between al-Ghazālī that does not require the connection of narrators and emphasizes more on critical criticism. Whereas al-Kulaynī requires his sanad to be continued, where he equalizes the infallible priest with the Prophet. The criterion is more to the criticism of sanad. The same criteria in the criticism method can facilitate tracking of authentic ḥadīth. Likewise with the different methods of criticism, many traditions are considered valid by the Sunnis but da‘īf according to the Shi‘a and vice versa.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2017 2017


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 8 No 2 (2022): DESEMBER Vol 8 No 1 (2022): JUNI Vol 7 No 2 (2021): DESEMBER Vol 7 No 1 (2021): JUNI Vol 6 No 2 (2020): DESEMBER Vol 6 No 1 (2020): JUNI Vol 5 No 2 (2019): DESEMBER Vol 5 No 1 (2019): JUNI Vol 4 No 2 (2018): DESEMBER Vol 4 No 1 (2018): JUNI Vol 3 No 2 (2017): DESEMBER More Issue