cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Ghiyats Ristiana
Contact Email
kanghiyats@gmail.com
Phone
+6287764329708
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING is published by IKIP Siliwangi publishes original research or theoretical papers about teaching and learning in mathematics education study program on current science issues, namely: 1. Mathematics educator in elementary, secondary and high school level 2. Mathematics observers and researchers 3. Educational decisions maker on the regional and national level
Location
Kota cimahi,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING
Published by STKIP Siliwangi Bandung
ISSN : 26214733     EISSN : 26214741     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics Other
(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING is published by IKIP Siliwangi publishes original research or theoretical papers about teaching and learning in mathematics education study program on current science issues, namely: 1. Mathematics educator in elementary, secondary and high school level 2. Mathematics observers and researchers 3. Educational decisions maker on the regional and national level
Arjuna Subject : Matematika - Matematika (Lain-Lain)
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 3, No 4 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2020" : 5 Documents clear
The Effect of Inductive- Deductive Approach on Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability and Self-Efficacy Cecep Mahmudin; Utari Sumarmo; Asep Kustiana
(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING Vol 3, No 4 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2020
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/jiml.v3i4.p215-226

Abstract

This research was a pre test-post test experimental control group design having a goal to analyze  the role of Inductive-Deductive Approach (IDA) on improving  students’ mathematical creative thinking  ability (MCTA) and self efficacy  (MSE). Subjects of this research were  70  eleventh grade students from two classes selected purposively in a Senior High School in Garut. Instruments of this research were a MCTA test, and a MSE scale. The research found that the role of IDA was greater than the role of scientific approach (SA) on improving  students’ MCTA and MSE. Students getting treatment with IDA approach obtained  MCTA and MSE at good grades qualification. While students taught by SA attained MCTA and MSE at low-moderate grades level.  Apart of those findings, the research found that students getting treatment with IDA encountered a litle bit difficulty  in solving MCTA tasks. In contrast students taught by SA experienced in allmost items of MCTA tasks.  In addition, the research also found there was no assocition between MCTA and MSE and students performed good and active learning during IDA lessons.Keyword: mathematical creative thinking,  mathematical self efficacy, model eliciting activities (IDA)
The Comparison of Mathematical Communication Capabilities Students Who Get The Think Talk Write (TTW) Learning Model and Group Investigation (GI) Learning Model Susanti, Rita
(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING Vol 3, No 4 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2020
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/jiml.v3i4.p227-238

Abstract

This study is a quasi-experimental study that aims to compare the mathematical communication skills between students who get the Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model and the Group Investigation (GI) Learning Model, examine their quality improvement and examine students' attitudes towards Think Talk Write (TTW) learning models. ) and Group Investigation (GI) Learning Models.The population in this study were all students of class VIII 1 of Leuwigoong Junior High School, with a sample of two classes, namely: class VIII-E as the experimental first class  who received the Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model and class VIII-H as the experimental second class  that obtained the Model Group Investigation (GI) Learning. The instrument used was a description of mathematical communication skills and attitude scale. The results of data analysis showed that the mathematical communication skills of students who got the Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model were no better than those who received the Group Investigation (GI) Learning Model. Quality Improvement of mathematical ability of experimental first class  students who get the Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model with the moderate category and for the improvement of mathematical communication skills of the experimental second class  students who receive the Group Invertigation (GI) learning model with the moderate category, and for student attitudes towards mathematics learning using Think Talk Write (TTW) and Invertigation learning models (GI) both interpret well.Keywords: Mathematical communication skills, Think Talk Write (TTW) models, Group Invertigation (GI) models.
Monopoly Game Media as an Effort to Improve Calculation Problem Solving Ability in Elementary School Students Mohammad Archi Maulyda; Vivi Rachmatul Hidayati; Muhammad Erfan
(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING Vol 3, No 4 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2020
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/jiml.v3i4.p199-207

Abstract

This development research was motivated by the information that the student's average score on the material for solving calculation problems, including those related to money, was still below the KKM (70). One of the reasons is that the teacher does not use the media to teach the material. To overcome this problem, it is necessary to develop media in accordance with the material. The data collection instrument in this study is a checklist sheet with observation and test techniques. The data analysis technique used is quantitative and descriptive qualitative data analysis. The development model for developing monopoly media refers to a development model with the ADDIE approach which includes 5 stages, namely analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The conclusion of the results of this study is that the monopoly game media is declared valid after being revised by material experts and media experts with a score of 75% which belongs to the B criteria with the Good category The effectiveness of the media in increasing the ability to solve calculation problems, including those related to money, by using the development of monopoly games for grade III students of SDN 4 Cakranegara, Mataram
Application of The Methaporical Thinking Method to Improve The Ability of Mathematical Connections, Creative Thinking and Self Confidence of Vocational School Students Ahmad Mirza
(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING Vol 3, No 4 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2020
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/jiml.v3i4.p239-245

Abstract

This study aims to examine the improvement of mathematical connection skills and creative thinking as well as students' self confidence. This is in line with the problems in this study, namely the low ability of mathematical connections and the ability to think creatively as well as the self-confidence of SMK students. This quasi-experimental study took a population of all students of SMK Negeri 1 Campaka, Cianjur Regency, with a sample of class XI, the class was given a pretest and posttest for mathematical connection skills and students' creative thinking abilities. The results of the quantitative data analysis research using the SPSS.19 for windows application program, show that based on the learning model and the cognitive stage, the level of achievement and increased mathematical connection skills and mathematical creative thinking of students who use the method of methaporical thinking is better than students who use conventional learning.
Improving Mathematics Critical Thinking Ability and Self Regulated Learning Of High School Method Through IMPROVE Students Dinar Andriyani; Citra Megiana Pertiwi
(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING Vol 3, No 4 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2020
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/jiml.v3i4.p208-214

Abstract

The low critical thinking skills and self-regulated learning in the field are the backgrounds for this research. This study aims to examine the improvement of mathematical critical thinking skills and self- regulated learning using the IMPROVE method and by using ordinary learning. The research method used was an experimental method with a pretest-posttest group research design involving two groups and randomized class sampling. The population is all high school students in Purwakarta Regency. All high schools in Purwakarta were randomly selected, SMAN 1 Maniis was selected, the sample was randomly selected by two classes, class XI Mia 2 as the control class and class XI Mia 1 as the experimental class. Data collection in this study was in the form of tests and non-tests, then the data on the scores of students' mathematical critical thinking skills and learning independence were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics using the two-difference test means. Based on the results of the study, both from the results of data analysis and hypothesis testing, the authors conclude that the achievement and improvement of mathematical critical thinking skills and self- regulated learning students whose learning using the IMPROVE method are better than those using ordinary learning.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 4 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2023 Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2023 Vol 6, No 2 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2023 Vol 6, No 1 (2023): VOLUME 6 NUMBER 1, MARCH 2023 Vol 5, No 4 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2022 Vol 5, No 3 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2022 Vol 5, No 2 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2022 Vol 5, No 1 (2022): VOLUME 5 NUMBER 1, MARCH 2022 Vol 4, No 4 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2021 Vol 4, No 3 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2021 Vol 4, No 2 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2021 Vol 4, No 1 (2021): VOLUME 4 NUMBER 1, MARCH 2021 Vol 3, No 4 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2020 Vol 3, No 3 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2020 Vol 3, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2020 Vol 3, No 1 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 1, MARCH 2020 Vol 2, No 4 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2019 Vol 2, No 3 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2019 Vol 2, No 2 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2019 Vol 2, No 1 (2019): VOLUME 2 NUMBER 1, MARCH 2019 Vol 1, No 4 (2018): VOLUME 1 NUMBER 4, DECEMBER 2018 Vol 1, No 3 (2018): VOLUME 1 NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2018 Vol 1, No 2 (2018): VOLUME 1 NUMBER 2, JUNE 2018 Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Volume 1 Number 1, March 2018 More Issue