Mulawarman Law Review
Mulawarman Law Review (MULREV) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University. MULREV published twice a year in June and December. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics in the fields of Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, State and Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Economic Law, Adat Law and Local Custom, Natural Resources and Environmental Law and another section related contemporary issues in law. ISSN: 2527-3485 | e-ISSN: 2527-3477
Articles
10 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2019"
:
10 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Burden of Proof Reversal in Criminal Acts of Money Laundering ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Khusnul Fauzi Zainal]]>;
<![CDATA[Syukri Akub]]>;
<![CDATA[Andi Muhammad Sofyan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (427.194 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.60
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze the burden of proof reversal system in handling cases of money laundering. This type of research is normative juridical legal research. The results of this study indicate that in the reversal system of the burden of proof of criminal acts of money laundering, each party has a burden of proof, the public prosecutor is burdened to prove that these assets are the property of the defendant and has a relationship with the original criminal act charged, while the defendant burdened to prove the origin of the assets claimed and if the defendant is unable to prove the origin of the assets, the assets can be strongly suspected to originate from criminal offenses. There are still obstacles in law enforcement both from the substance of the law (norms), legal structure (law enforcement agencies) and the culture of law (the culture of community law).]]>
<![CDATA[Corporate Prosecution in Criminal Acts of Corruption: Opportunity and Challenge ]]>
<![CDATA[Andi Muhammad Sofyan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (455.599 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.67
<![CDATA[The corporation as an entity or legal subject whose existence contributes greatly in promoting economic growth and national development. However in reality, it is often for corporations to commit various criminal acts (corporate crime) that have a detrimental impact on the state and people. This research is normative legal research. Legal research which places the law as a normative system. The research approach uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results showed that the enactment of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 13 Year 2016 was to clarify the guidelines for the Public Prosecutor in prosecuting corporate defendants in corruption criminal acts. The application of sanctions against corporations as perpetrators of corruption is carried out as an effort to recover the losses of the State and the restoration of the state’s economy is an appropriate step considering the essence of criminal punishment in eradicating criminal acts of corruption aimed at recovering state losses or the state’s economy.]]>
<![CDATA[Penggunaan Instrumen Kontrak dalam Pembangunan Centre Point of Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Wahyu]]>;
<![CDATA[Harustiati A. Moein]]>;
<![CDATA[Mustafa Bola]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Ilham Arisaputra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (489.957 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.68
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan penggunaan instrumen kontrak dalam pembangunan Centre Point of Indonesia (CPI) di Kota Makassar. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan penggunaan instrumen kontrak dalam pembangunan Centre Point of Indonesia (CPI) di Kota Makassar dimungkinkan oleh peraturan perundang-undangan, yakni Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, dan Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2007 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 dan Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil. Kontrak yang dimaksudkan dalam konteks ini adalah kontrak publik oleh karena salah satu pihaknya adalah Pemerintah Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Tanggung jawab para pihak dalam kontrak untuk pembangunan Centre Point of Indonesia (CPI) di Kota Makassar lahir dari adanya hak dan kewajiban masing-masing pihak yang diatur dalam Perjanjian. Selain itu, tanggung jawab yang dimaksud juga tibul dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang terkait dengan kegiatan reklamasi tersebut. Untuk itu, maka para pihak memikul beban tanggung jawab, baik secara personal maupun secara institusional sehingga para pihak dapat dinakan sanksi administratif, sanksi perdata, maupun sanksi pidana.]]>
<![CDATA[Rente as Proof of Land Ownership ]]>
<![CDATA[Nur Hidayani Alimuddin]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (426.695 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.69
<![CDATA[Rente or proof of payment of land taxes is no longer able used as proof of landownership, however there still people who think rente as proof of land ownership. This research is juridical empirical that analyze the position and perception of society that think rente as proof of ownership of the land in Pangkajene Islands Regency. The result of the study are rente position after the enactment of the Basic Agrarian Law is no longer able to be used as proof of land ownership. On the other hand the National Land Board still receive rente as written evidence to register a land, and there are still people who think rente as proof of land ownership.]]>
<![CDATA[Prinsip Kepatutan Pembiayaan dengan Jaminan Fidusia ]]>
<![CDATA[Fadlia Widhaswara]]>;
<![CDATA[Nurfaidah Said]]>;
<![CDATA[Hasbir Paserangi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (965.319 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.70
<![CDATA[Asas kepatutan dalam sebuah perjanjian memengang peran penting dan menjadi salah satu syarat sahnya perjanjian. Dalam pelaksanaannya, mewajibkan para pihak mengindahkan kepatutan dan kepantasan sehingga menciptakan rasa keadilan dalam masyarakat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum empiris (empirical research). Penelitian ini akan dilakukan di Kantor Notaris/PPAT di Kota Makassar dan Pembiayaan Konsumen di Kota Makassar. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah Notaris/PPAT di Kota Makassar, Pembiayaan Konsumen, dan para pihak dalam Perjanjian. Penentuan sampel dilakukan dengan teknis purposive sampling. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemberian kuasa dari konsumen sebagai debitor kepada perusahaan pembiayaan sebagai kreditor merupakan inisiatif dari satu pihak saja yakni kreditor. Hal ini jelas tidak memenuhi asas kepatutan dalam Pasal 1339 KUHPerdata, karena dalam pelaksanaannya konsumen sama sekali tidak mengerti bahkan tidak mengetahui apa yang menjadi isi dari Akta Jaminan Fidusiayang telah mengikat dirinya sebagai pemberi fidusia. Untuk memenuhi asas kepatutan, sebaiknya pengunaan Surat Kuasa untuk Kuasa yang digunakan untuk pemberian jaminan fidusia haruslah ditiadakan.]]>
<![CDATA[Burden of Proof Reversal in Criminal Acts of Money Laundering ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Khusnul Fauzi Zainal]]>;
<![CDATA[Syukri Akub]]>;
<![CDATA[Andi Muhammad Sofyan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.60
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze the burden of proof reversal system in handling cases of money laundering. This type of research is normative juridical legal research. The results of this study indicate that in the reversal system of the burden of proof of criminal acts of money laundering, each party has a burden of proof, the public prosecutor is burdened to prove that these assets are the property of the defendant and has a relationship with the original criminal act charged, while the defendant burdened to prove the origin of the assets claimed and if the defendant is unable to prove the origin of the assets, the assets can be strongly suspected to originate from criminal offenses. There are still obstacles in law enforcement both from the substance of the law (norms), legal structure (law enforcement agencies) and the culture of law (the culture of community law).]]>
<![CDATA[Corporate Prosecution in Criminal Acts of Corruption: Opportunity and Challenge ]]>
<![CDATA[Andi Muhammad Sofyan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.67
<![CDATA[The corporation as an entity or legal subject whose existence contributes greatly in promoting economic growth and national development. However in reality, it is often for corporations to commit various criminal acts (corporate crime) that have a detrimental impact on the state and people. This research is normative legal research. Legal research which places the law as a normative system. The research approach uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results showed that the enactment of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 13 Year 2016 was to clarify the guidelines for the Public Prosecutor in prosecuting corporate defendants in corruption criminal acts. The application of sanctions against corporations as perpetrators of corruption is carried out as an effort to recover the losses of the State and the restoration of the state’s economy is an appropriate step considering the essence of criminal punishment in eradicating criminal acts of corruption aimed at recovering state losses or the state’s economy.]]>
<![CDATA[Penggunaan Instrumen Kontrak dalam Pembangunan Centre Point of Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Wahyu]]>;
<![CDATA[Harustiati A. Moein]]>;
<![CDATA[Mustafa Bola]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Ilham Arisaputra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.68
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan penggunaan instrumen kontrak dalam pembangunan Centre Point of Indonesia (CPI) di Kota Makassar. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan penggunaan instrumen kontrak dalam pembangunan Centre Point of Indonesia (CPI) di Kota Makassar dimungkinkan oleh peraturan perundang-undangan, yakni Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, dan Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2007 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 dan Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil. Kontrak yang dimaksudkan dalam konteks ini adalah kontrak publik oleh karena salah satu pihaknya adalah Pemerintah Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Tanggung jawab para pihak dalam kontrak untuk pembangunan Centre Point of Indonesia (CPI) di Kota Makassar lahir dari adanya hak dan kewajiban masing-masing pihak yang diatur dalam Perjanjian. Selain itu, tanggung jawab yang dimaksud juga tibul dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang terkait dengan kegiatan reklamasi tersebut. Untuk itu, maka para pihak memikul beban tanggung jawab, baik secara personal maupun secara institusional sehingga para pihak dapat dinakan sanksi administratif, sanksi perdata, maupun sanksi pidana.]]>
<![CDATA[Rente as Proof of Land Ownership ]]>
<![CDATA[Nur Hidayani Alimuddin]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.69
<![CDATA[Rente or proof of payment of land taxes is no longer able used as proof of landownership, however there still people who think rente as proof of land ownership. This research is juridical empirical that analyze the position and perception of society that think rente as proof of ownership of the land in Pangkajene Islands Regency. The result of the study are rente position after the enactment of the Basic Agrarian Law is no longer able to be used as proof of land ownership. On the other hand the National Land Board still receive rente as written evidence to register a land, and there are still people who think rente as proof of land ownership.]]>
<![CDATA[Prinsip Kepatutan Pembiayaan dengan Jaminan Fidusia ]]>
<![CDATA[Fadlia Widhaswara]]>;
<![CDATA[Nurfaidah Said]]>;
<![CDATA[Hasbir Paserangi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.70
<![CDATA[Asas kepatutan dalam sebuah perjanjian memengang peran penting dan menjadi salah satu syarat sahnya perjanjian. Dalam pelaksanaannya, mewajibkan para pihak mengindahkan kepatutan dan kepantasan sehingga menciptakan rasa keadilan dalam masyarakat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum empiris (empirical research). Penelitian ini akan dilakukan di Kantor Notaris/PPAT di Kota Makassar dan Pembiayaan Konsumen di Kota Makassar. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah Notaris/PPAT di Kota Makassar, Pembiayaan Konsumen, dan para pihak dalam Perjanjian. Penentuan sampel dilakukan dengan teknis purposive sampling. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemberian kuasa dari konsumen sebagai debitor kepada perusahaan pembiayaan sebagai kreditor merupakan inisiatif dari satu pihak saja yakni kreditor. Hal ini jelas tidak memenuhi asas kepatutan dalam Pasal 1339 KUHPerdata, karena dalam pelaksanaannya konsumen sama sekali tidak mengerti bahkan tidak mengetahui apa yang menjadi isi dari Akta Jaminan Fidusiayang telah mengikat dirinya sebagai pemberi fidusia. Untuk memenuhi asas kepatutan, sebaiknya pengunaan Surat Kuasa untuk Kuasa yang digunakan untuk pemberian jaminan fidusia haruslah ditiadakan.]]>
