cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dr. Rahadi Wasi Bintoro, S.H., M.H
Contact Email
rahadiwasibintoro@gmail.com
Phone
+6281542902305
Journal Mail Official
authentica.unsoed@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law, Jenderal Soedirman University Yustisia I Building, Room Number 110 Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122
Location
Kab. banyumas,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Authentica : Privat Law Journal
Published by Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
ISSN : 26554763     EISSN : 26554771     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.atc.
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
AUTHENTICA aims to provide a forum for lecturers and researchers to publish the original articles about Law Science, especially Privat Law Studies. The focus of AUTHENTICA is publishing the manuscript of a research study or conceptual ideas. We are interested in topics which relate Privat Law issues in Indonesia and around the world, among them: Agrarian Law Adat Law Consumer Law Bussines Law Banking Law Family and Marriage Law Inheritance Law Sharia Law Legal Agreement And other Privat law Studies
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 4, No 1 (2021)" : 7 Documents clear
Implementation of Balance Principles in Banking Credit Agreements (Study of Bank Jateng Purwokerto Wage Market Branch) Agung Setyawan Tri Nugroho
Authentica Vol 4, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2021.4.1.69

Abstract

Notary is a public official who is authorized to make an authentic deed. Authentic Deed is a legal document that is very important for banks to secure their transactions, in practice the use of a deed under the hand is still rife in banks. This is evident from the still many uses of standard contracts in credit agreements. Credit agreements whose standard forms are unbalanced to provide a strong legal umbrella in providing consumer protection in the financial services sector. OJK issued Regulation Number: 1 / POJK.07 / 2013, with the entry into force of the POJK, clearly stipulated the principle of balance in the credit agreement The method used in this research is normative juridical method. The data used is secondary data. The results showed that the application of the principle of balance in a banking credit agreement (study in Bank Jateng Cabang Pasar Wage Purwokerto), there were differences in the application of the principle of balance before and after the issuance of POJK, it is clear where the debtor's position in the agreement was weak can be seen if there is a change in Government policy in the economic and monetary sectors which causes the Bank to change all lending rates unilaterally not involving the debtor's approval so that it can be concluded that the principle of balance before POJK is not applied, whereas after the existence of POJK Bank Jateng is in accordance with the position of both creditors and debtors in the agreement in accordance with their rights and obligations. The legal consequences of the credit agreement that does not carry out the principle of balance of the deed based on the provisions above, then the credit agreement with not fulfilling the legal provisions as required by legislation, then the agreement is null and void because the formal conditions are not fulfilled, then the business actor financial services, namely banks, which do not meet the protection elements stipulated in the POJK, may be subject to sanctions regulated in Article 53 POJK. Its legal protection for consumers is repressive based on POJK Article 40. Suggestions for supervision from OJK in assessing and verifying the form of credit agreement at the bank, so that the clauses in the credit agreement do not violate the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act and Regulation Number: 1 / POJK.07 / 2013 concerning Consumer Protection in the Financial Services Sector. Keywords: Authentic Deed, Standard Agreement, Credit Agreement, Financial Services Authority Regulation, Bank BPD. 
Subject and Object Rahadi Wasi Bintoro
Authentica Vol 4, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2021.4.1.229

Abstract

Exoneration Clausula in Due to The Marriage Agreement Made By Notary After The Decision of The Constitutional Court Number 69 / PUU-XIII-2015 Binar Kikis Kiani
Authentica Vol 4, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2021.4.1.79

Abstract

Arrangements regarding marital agreements after the issuance of a constitutional court ruling shifts the arrangement of when the marriage agreement may be made. Before the issuance of the Constitutional Court's ruling a marriage agreement is made before or during a marriage while after the issuance of the Constitutional Court's decision a marriage agreement may be made before, during or during marriage. This has different consequences for both, especially for the deed containing the Exoneration clause in it. This research is a Normative Juridical research which uses the statutory approach and case approach. The research specifications used are prescriptive. The author uses secondary data and the method of presenting data using narrative text forms and analyzed with qualitative juridical methods. The research results show that the exoneration clause was found in the deed made by the Notary Public before the decision of the Constitutional Court, namely the deed xx / yy in Article 4 and in the notary deed after the Constitutional Court's decision number 5 of 2019 in Article 1 and Article 2. legal consequences arising from there is an exoneration clause on the deed made before the Constitutional Court Decision, namely that the deed is null and void, but the parties may submit a remake of the marriage agreement to the notary and the Notary will make a new deed on the premises and substance while the legal consequences arising from the exoneration clause in the deed made after the Constitutional Court Decision, if the parties do not make changes to the exoneration clause, then the deed is null and void, but if it will make changes to the deed contained in the exoneration clause, the parties can submit changes to the Notary and Notary only change the substance. Suggestion from this research is the need for the role of the Notary in terms of making the agreement so that the agreement that has been stated in the deed and agreed by the parties does not harm both parties and does not cause a lawsuit in the future. Keywords: Exoneration Clause, Marriage Agreement, Constitutional Court
Partnership Agreement PT. Go-Jek Indonesia In View of Civil Code of Law ANNISA RIZQI PRADANI
Authentica Vol 4, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2021.4.1.136

Abstract

PT. GO-JEK Indonesia gives a fresh breeze to the base motorcycle taxis who just sit and wait for passengers to be able to join as partners, the drivers must cooperate with the company. The cooperation is expressed in the form of a partnership agreement. The problem occurs because the driver does not understand the partnership agreement and raises the impression of imbalance between the parties, the driver demands to be made an employee or worker. This research aims to analyze PT partnership agreement. GO-JEK Indonesia with drivers is reviewed according to the Civil Code. This research uses normative juridical approach methods to analyze partnership agreements as what is written in the legislation.  Partnership agreements made by PT. GO-JEK Indonesia and drivers comply with Article 1313 of the Civil Code and have fulfilled the legal element of article 1320 of the Civil Code both subjective and objective requirements. Partnership agreements made in formil are written in black and white and made electronically (online). The partnership agreement contains detailed reciprocal agreements containing the rights and obligations of each of the parties. Partnership agreements are a type of nameless agreement whose rules are subject to the general rules of chapters I, II,IV of book III, and the principle of freedom of contract. Elements of the partnership agreement differ from the elements of the employment agreement. Keywords: Agreements, Partnership Agreements, PT. GO-JEK Indonesia
Rejection of Notary Honorary Assembly Approval as Obstruction of Justice Qualification for Criminal Law Enforcementrejection of Notary Honorary Assembly Approval as Obstruction of Justice Qualification for Criminal Law Enforcement Alif Ridwan
Authentica Vol 4, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2021.4.1.137

Abstract

Article 66 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 66 paragraph (3) of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary Public is a form of protection for notaries, however the Notary Honorary Council is deemed to obstruct the enforcement of criminal acts or is known as obstruction of justice. Based on this, whether the rejection of MKN approval can qualify as an obstruction of justice in criminal law enforcement. This study aims to analyze the qualifications of MKN approval as a category of Obstruction of justice in criminal law enforcement. The authors use normative juridical research methods. The result of the research is that the rejection of MKN Approval is not a qualification for obstruction of justice in criminal law enforcement as long as it is done in good faith. The approval of the Notary Honorary Council is a rechtmatig act because it is regulated in Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN. Rejection of MKN Approval is a legal protection for Notaries in carrying out their profession in a preventive manner. Based on Article 66 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Position and Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 7 of 2016 concerning the Notary Honorary Council and the principle of legality, rejection of the request for MKN approval has legal consequences to stop or hinder the investigation process. Therefore it is necessary to amend Article 66 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary Public. In addition, there is also a need for amendments to Article 27 of the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 7 of 2016 concerning the Notary Honorary Council which contains a clause on the conditions that the Notary Honorary Council can refuse. Keywords: Approval, Notary Honorary Council and Obstruction Of Justice
The Criminal Act of Falsification Authentic Deeds by Notaries in Adjusting the Status of the Foundation Rifa Fadlillah
Authentica Vol 4, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2021.4.1.138

Abstract

Yayasan diatur dalam Undang-Undang nomor 16 tahun 2001. Yayasan yang telah ada sebelum undang-undang ini wajib melakukan penyesuian anggaran dasar sesuai dengan ketentuan undang-undang yayasan guna tetap diakui sebagai badan hukum. Namun kenyataanya banyak permasalahan yang timbul yaitu tidak dapatnya sebuah yayasan untuk menyesuaikan anggaran dasarmya karena daluarsa waktu. Notaris sebagai pejabat umum yang berperan sebagai pihak yang dapat membantu menyesuaikan anggaran dasar yayasan ternyata tidak luput dari masalah yang timbul akibat dari penyesuaian anggara dasar tersebut. Salah satu masalahnya adalah dianggap melakukan pemalsuan terhadap akta perubahan anggaran dasar.Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, dengan metode analisis data normatif kualitatif.Hasil penelitian dalam pertimbangan hakim memutus perkara pemalsuan akta otentik telah berdasar kepada unsur-unsur yang ada dalam pasal 264 KUHP, namun hal tersebut diarasa kurang tepat karena hanya berdasar pada ketentuan yang ada dalam KUHP saja, seharusnya hakim juga melakukan pertimbangan dengan melihat ketentuan yang ada dalam undang-undang jabatan notaris. Status yayasan yang tidak dapat menyesuaikan anngaran dasar sesuai dengan ketentuan pasal 71 undang-undang yayasan tidak dapat menggunakan kata yayasan di depan nama yayasannya dan juga tidak diakuinya yayasan tersebut sebagai badan hukum dan dapat diminta pembubarannya berdasar putusan pengadilan atau atas dasar permintaan para pengurusnya.Kata kunci: Pemalsuan Akta Otentik, Yayasan, Penyesuaian Anggaran Dasar Yayasan.
The Existence of Indigenous Peoples in The Investment Regime Rahadi Wasi Bintoro
Authentica Vol 4, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2021.4.1.295

Abstract

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 6, No 2 (2023) Vol 6, No 1 (2023) Vol 5, No 2 (2022) Vol 5, No 1 (2022) Vol 4, No 2 (2021) Vol 4, No 1 (2021) Vol 3, No 2 (2020) Vol 3, No 1 (2020) Vol 2, No 2 (2019) Vol 2, No 1 (2019) Vol 1, No 2 (2018) Vol 1, No 1 (2018) More Issue