cover
Contact Name
AGUS PURWANTO
Contact Email
aguspurwanto.prof@gmail.com
Phone
+628159977676
Journal Mail Official
journal.ijospl@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Winrow Veritas Law Firm Jakarta - Indonesia Principal Contact : Agus Budianto WA : +628159977676 Mailing Address: Email : journal.ijospl@gmail.com Email : editor@ijospl.org
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW (IJOSPL)
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27742245     DOI : https://doi.org/10.8888/ijospl
he main focus of INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW (IJoSPL) is to publish the results of research and work of thought, with the following fields: theory or doctrine, principles, norms, philosophy, comparison, application, history, relations with other disciplines in the field. -Social Sciences, Policy and Law. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW (IJoSPL) provides a forum for sharing timely and up-to-date publication of scientific research and review articles. The journal publishes original research papers at the forefront of law and social sciences. The topics included and emphasized in this journal are, but not limited to, law, political science, economics, environment, history, communication, sociology and safety. The topics related to this journal include but are not limited to: International law Contract law Civil law Political law Sociology Business studies Industrial relations Criminology Safety Constitutional and administrative law Tort law Common law and equity Legal history Social philosophy Behavioral science Management Environmental social science Criminal law Property law Religious law Political science Social psychology Communication studies Economics Education
Articles 12 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023): August 2023" : 12 Documents clear
EXCELLENCE SPORTS DISPUTE RESOLUTION INSTITUTION IN INDONESIA OUTSIDE THE COURT IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY Sanusi Sanusi; Zainal Arifin Hoesein; Nanang Solihin
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023): August 2023
Publisher : INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.8888/ijospl.v4i3.154

Abstract

Political law is two interrelated meanings that cannot be separated, because politics is a strategy to achieve power by any means. While the law is a means or tool used when power cannot achieve the purpose of power. Where the law is essentially to protect individuals or communities from the arbitrary actions of power holders and / or parties who commit acts of justice, in the end to get a sense of justice in the nation and state, in the thought that the state in the development of human civilization is closely related to religion, the relationship between the two occurs the transformation of Islamic law in the development of Indonesian legal politics, both of which experience ups and downs with the development of human thought about the function of the state in his personal life and at the same time in the relationship between religion and the state he embraces. This research aims to describe Political Law in Islamic Law. This research uses a qualitative approach with the method of literature (Library research). The reform era research data outlines the configuration of a democracy-based legal political system. The system emphasizes the need to organize laws that are populist and responsive, not repressive and authoritarian. Legal regulation policies must reflect the aspirations of the citizens of the community/state. The legal products achieved must be a mecca in solving legal problems and achieving the goals of the life of the nation and state. The substance of the law is built not to serve the interests of the ruling elite, but must be an instrument and guideline in organizing legal development aimed at realizing physical and mental welfare.
THE EXISTENCE OF ARBITRATION INSTITUTIONS FOR PERFORMANCE SPORTS ATHLETE DISPUTES (BAORI, BAKI, NDRC) IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF JUSTICE Sanusi Sanusi; Efridani Lubis; Abdul Haris Semendawai
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023): August 2023
Publisher : INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.8888/ijospl.v4i3.156

Abstract

Alternative dispute resolution bodies in the world of sports in Indonesia consist of several entities, namely the Indonesian Sports Arbitration Agency (BAKI), the Indonesian Sports Arbitration Body (BAORI), and the National Dispute Resolution Chamber (NDRC). The process of establishing NDRC Indonesia began with a seminar organized by the Football Association of Indonesia (PSSI) in collaboration with FIFA. Meanwhile, BAORI was established by the National Sports Committee of Indonesia (KONI), and BAKI was initiated by the Indonesian Olympic Committee (KOI). Dispute resolution in the world of sports through arbitration is regulated by Law Number 3 of 2005 concerning the National Sports System. Arbitration institutions such as BAORI, BAKI, and NDRC play a crucial role in resolving various conflicts involving athletes and relevant parties in performance sports in Indonesia. They serve as avenues for seeking justice without going through litigation processes. However, there are challenges in the decisions made by these institutions, where the decisions can favor one party in the dispute or vice versa. In case of dissatisfaction with the decision outcomes, BAKI has a system of appellate bodies that can be utilized, while BAORI and NDRC may lack similar mechanisms. NDRC, as an arbitration institution that focuses more on the sport of football, can be more effective in handling disputes that arise in this performance sport. Moreover, NDRC is affiliated with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) and has connections with FIFA, making the athlete dispute resolution process more structured compared to other sports that may not have a similar focus like BAORI and BAKI. In terminology, both BAKI and BAORI have equal positions and existences under Law Number 3 of 2005 concerning the National Sports System. Article 88 Paragraph 1 of Law 3/2005 indicates that the resolution of sports disputes should be achieved through consultation and consensus by the parent sports organizations. If consultation and consensus fail, Paragraph 2 states that dispute resolution can be pursued through arbitration or alternative dispute resolution in accordance with the regulations. If all these efforts do not result in a satisfactory resolution, Paragraph 3 states that dispute resolution can be carried out through the appropriate jurisdictional court.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12