cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Heru Santoso Wahito Nugroho
Contact Email
alohaacademy2018@gmail.com
Phone
+639173045312
Journal Mail Official
aijhaaijha@gmail.com
Editorial Address
1. Jl. Ngurah Rai 18, Bangli, Bali, Indonesia 2. Jl. Cemara 25, Dare, Ds/Kec Sukorejo, Ponorogo, Jatim, Indonesia
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
AloHA International Journal of Health Advancement (AIJHA)
Published by Alliance of Health Activists
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26218224     DOI : https://doi.org/10.33846/aijha
Core Subject : Health, Science,
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Dentistry Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health
Aloha International Journal of Health Advancement (AIJHA) is a media for the publication of articles on research, book review, literature review, commentary, opinion, case report, tips, scientific news and letter to editor in the areas of health science and practice such as public health, medicine, dentistry, nursing, midwifery, nutrition, pharmaceutical, environmental health, health technology, medical laboratories, health education, health information system, health management, and health popular.
Arjuna Subject : Profesi Kesehatan - Profesi Kesehatan (Lain-Lain)
Articles 3 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 4, No 3 (2021): March" : 3 Documents clear
Development of Quantity and Quality of Organic Granule Fertilizer Products in Home Industries Susi Nurweni; Vincentius Supriyono; Beny Suyanto
Aloha International Journal of Health Advancement (AIJHA) Vol 4, No 3 (2021): March
Publisher : Alliance oh Health Activists (AloHA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33846/aijha40302

Abstract

This research is a development of previous research (2018) on the manufacture of granulated organic fertilizer. The purpose of this research is to make compost into organic fertilizer granules. To speed up composting, MOL is used. This study applied a factorial design with a factor of type of adhesive and a factor of the percentage of adhesive added. The adhesive consisted of 3 types, namely clay and molasses, while the comparison factor for the percentage of adhesive consists of 3 levels, namely 5%; 7.5% and 10%. Each treatment variation was replicated 5 times. The results showed that the bulk density was 0.4-0.6 g/cm3, the percentage of granule size was 70%-85%, water absorption was 29%-36% and the dispersion time was 13-22 hours. The levels of N = 3.48%-8.53%, P = 1.30%-2.03%, K = 0.03%-6.73% and C/N ratio = 12.92-20.45. Furthermore, it was concluded that the C/N ratio, N, P and K granules of organic fertilizer produced had met the requirements of the Regulation of the Minister of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia No. 70/Permentan/SR.140/10/2011. Keywords: compost; granule organic fertilizer; granulator
Development of Potential of Biogas Waste and Cow Urine for Organic Liquid Fertilizer Mujiyono Mujiyono; Sujangi Sujangi; Beny Suyanto
Aloha International Journal of Health Advancement (AIJHA) Vol 4, No 3 (2021): March
Publisher : Alliance oh Health Activists (AloHA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33846/aijha40301

Abstract

Biogas waste (slurry) and cow urine can be processed into fertilizer that has economic value for the community in addition to making the cowshed cleaner. This study aims to process biogas waste and cow urine into organic liquid fertilizer. This experimental study used a randomized design consisting of 5 formulations of organic liquid fertilizer that were treated, namely the ratio of biogas waste and cow urine with a ratio of formula: A (3:1); B (1:1); C (2:1); D (1:0) and E (0:1). Each treatment was replicated 3 times, in order to obtain 15 samples. To speed up the process of making fertilizer, 1% EM4 was added. The process of making fertilizer using aeration and fermentation methods. Assessment of fertilizer maturation results based on physical and chemical parameters. The results of the measurement of chemical parameters are: N (1.03%-1.51%), P (0.78%-1.22%); K (0.15%-4.51%) and C/N ratio (13.9-23.0). The best ratio of biogas waste and urine is 1:1. The results of the measurement of physical parameters are: characteristic odor of fermentation/tape; pH (7.0-8.6); color/texture: dark brown; and this does not violate the limits of the minister of health regulations. Keywords: biogas waste; cow urine; liquid organic fertilizer
The Relationship Between the Implementation of Phase I Cardiac Rehabilitation and the Outcome of Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in West Java Hospitals Indah Dwi Astuti; M. Rizki Akbar; Aan Nuraeni; Romalina Romalina
Aloha International Journal of Health Advancement (AIJHA) Vol 4, No 3 (2021): March
Publisher : Alliance oh Health Activists (AloHA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33846/aijha40303

Abstract

The implementation of phase I cardiac rehabilitation in patients undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery is useful to assist the recovery process and improve the quality of patient outcomes. However, the implementation of cardiac rehabilitation in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery patients is still unknown. Thus, this study aims to identify how the implementation of phase I cardiac rehabilitation and its relationship to the outcome of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery in hospitals in West Java. The research design was a cohort study. Sampling was done by purposive sampling method and obtained 24 respondents. Data were collected by observing the implementation of phase I cardiac rehabilitation and patient outcome sheets. The data were analyzed descriptively, followed by the Kendall Tau and Spearman Rank tests. The results showed that the implementation of phase I cardiac rehabilitation was in the sufficient and less categories (50%), the length of stay in the intensive room was prolonged (70.8%), postoperative length of stay was in the normal category (95.8%), there were postoperative complications (20.8%), functional capacity in the category of light intensity activity (83.3%), and knowledge in the good category (66.7%). The results of the analysis of the relationship between the implementation of phase I cardiac rehabilitation with patient outcomes (length of stay in the intensive care unit and postoperatively, postoperative complications, functional capacity, and knowledge) showed p value > 0.05. Furthermore, it was concluded that there was no relationship between the implementation of phase I cardiac rehabilitation and patient outcomes. However, clinically it does not mean that phase I cardiac rehabilitation has no impact on patient outcomes. This may occur because the implementation of cardiac rehabilitation is still in the sufficient and insufficient category, as a result of the lack of clarity of the SOPs used. So it is recommended to evaluate and improve SOPs on cardiac rehabilitation so that it is in harmony with patients undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Keywords: Coronary artery bypass surgery; patient outcome; phase I cardiac rehabilitation

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 3

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 6, No 7 (2023): July Vol 6, No 2 (2023): February Vol 6, No 1 (2023): January Vol 5, No 12 (2022): December Vol 5, No 11 (2022): November Vol 5, No 8 (2022): August Vol 5, No 7 (2022): July Vol 5, No 6 (2022): June Vol 5, No 5 (2022): May Vol 5, No 4 (2022): April Vol 5, No 3 (2022): March Vol 5, No 2 (2022): February Vol 5, No 1 (2022): January Vol 4, No 12 (2021): December Vol 4, No 11 (2021): November Vol 4, No 10 (2021): October Vol 4, No 9 (2021): September Vol 4, No 7 (2021): July Vol 4, No 6 (2021): June Vol 4, No 5 (2021): May Vol 4, No 4 (2021): April Vol 4, No 3 (2021): March Vol 4, No 2 (2021): February Vol 4, No 1 (2021): January Vol 3, No 8 (2020): August Vol 3, No 7 (2020): July Vol 3, No 6 (2020): June Vol 3, No 5 (2020): May Vol 3, No 4 (2020): April Vol 3, No 3 (2020): March Vol 3, No 2 (2020): February Vol 3, No 1 (2020): January Vol 2, No 12 (2019): December Vol 2, No 11 (2019): November Vol 2, No 10 (2019): October Vol 2, No 9 (2019): September Vol 2, No 8 (2019): August Vol 2, No 7 (2019): July Vol 2, No 6 (2019): June Vol 2, No 5 (2019): May Vol 2, No 4 (2019): April Vol 2, No 3 (2019): MARCH Vol 2, No 2 (2019): FEBRUARY Vol 2, No 1 (2019): JANUARY Vol 1, No 6 (2018): DECEMBER Vol 1, No 5 (2018): NOVEMBER Vol 1, No 4 (2018): OCTOBER Vol 1, No 3 (2018): SEPTEMBER Vol 1, No 2 (2018): AUGUST Vol 1, No 1 (2018): JULY More Issue