cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Efridani Lubis
Contact Email
fhuiajurisdictie@gmail.com
Phone
+6221-8484719
Journal Mail Official
fhuiajurisdictie@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Gedung Alawiyah Lt. 5, Jalan Raya Jatiwaringin No. 12 Pondok Gede, Jakarta, Indonesia, 17411
Location
Kota bekasi,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie
Published by Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah
ISSN : 16935918     EISSN : 28098641     DOI : https://doi.org/10.34005/jhj
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie is focused on publishing the original research articles, review articles from contributors, and the current issues related to Law Studies. The main objective of Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie is to provide a platform for the international scholars, academicians, and researchers to share the contemporary thoughts in the fields of Law Studies. SCOPE. Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie publishes research papers in the all the fields of Law Studies. Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Business Law Syaria Business Law, International Law, Islamic Law, Anti-Corruption Law
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2 No 1 (2020): Perkembangan Hukum Pidana dan Penegakannya" : 5 Documents clear
ANALISIS PENERAPAN PRINSIP PREJUDICIEL GESCHILL DALAM PUTUSAN SELA PENGADILAN NEGERI BEKASI NOMOR: 1242/Pid.B/2018/PN.Bks Tanggal 19 November 2018 Nur Agustina Utami; Syarif Fadillah; F fauziah
Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie Vol 2 No 1 (2020): Perkembangan Hukum Pidana dan Penegakannya
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (559.443 KB) | DOI: 10.34005/jhj.v2i1.17

Abstract

The judge as the part that decides on the case plays a very important role in determining thefuture of the law, because each judge's decision will become the center of public attention. Thejudge does not only act as a mouthpiece of the law, but the judge also acts as the inventor of the law (recht vinding). The exercise of the authority of judges in criminal proceedings in law enforcement should uphold the principles that apply in the Criminal Procedure Code in court and benefit justice seekers. in the development of criminal procedure law in Indonesia,specifically regulating the postponement of criminal proceedings related to civil cases or socalled prejudiciel geschil in Indonesia, is regulated in Article 81 of the Criminal Code whichstipulates that "Postponement of criminal prosecution develops with judicial disputes, delaysexpired ". However, if examined closely, it seems that the provisions of Article 81 of theCriminal Code only link prayer disputes with expiration, but not explicitly which will takeprecedence when civil and criminal cases are brought to court at the same time. Theunregulated court dispute has clearly made the legal vacuum (rechtsvacuum) related toprejudicieel geschil, as well as lead to dualism in judicial practices in Indonesia.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENGEDARAN OBAT-OBATAN YANG TIDAK MEMILIKI IZIN EDAR PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID 19 Tantra Hadimulya; Efridani Lubis; Muhammad Fahruddin
Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie Vol 2 No 1 (2020): Perkembangan Hukum Pidana dan Penegakannya
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (380.377 KB) | DOI: 10.34005/jhj.v2i1.18

Abstract

Lina Marlena, 1220160040, Law Enforcement Against Circulation Of Drugs That Do Not Have ACirculation Permit During The Covid 19 Pandemic. Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Assyafi’iyah, 2020. The purpose of this study is to determine law enforcement efforts without adistribution permit during the Covid 19 pandemic. This research uses a juridical-empirical researchmethod, a problem approach based on applicable laws and regulations, then touches on legalprinciples and facts of events. that happens on the field. The results of the study can be concludedthat someone can be said to have carried out the act of circulating illegal drugs if they violate articles196-197 of Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health. Meanwhile, corporations that carry out illegal drug distribution are charged under Article 201 of the Health Law and also for law enforcement, forperpetrators who have circulated illegal drugs, there are several sanctions, namely for criminal sanctions the perpetrator can be subjected to articles in accordance with the health law. , and forcivil sanctions the perpetrator is responsible for providing compensation for damages or losses to consumers as a result of consuming goods, and finally administrative sanctions in the form of verbal warnings, revocation of business licenses, and imposition of disciplinary penalties based onprevailing laws and regulations.
TINJAUAN HUKUM KEWENANGAN JAKSA DALAM PEMERIKSAAN TAMBAHAN MENURUT ASAS DOMINUS LITIS BERDASARKAN KUHAP Alfajri Firmansyah
Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie Vol 2 No 1 (2020): Perkembangan Hukum Pidana dan Penegakannya
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (576.647 KB) | DOI: 10.34005/jhj.v2i1.19

Abstract

As a product of the law touted as the great work of the nation Indonesia, KUHAP introduces a functional differentiation framework, where The investigation is entirely handed over to the police, while the prosecutor's office serves only as a public prosecutor and the conduct of the management of judges. In kuhap itself adheres to the principle of functional differentiation, will It raises a question as to what is the position of Dominus litis in the KUHAP when combined with the integrared criminal justice system in it it contains the principle of functional differentiation. It means when we leave. From the understanding that Dominus litis is the controller of the case, then the extent to which stages of the examination process that can be viewed as dominis litis Jaksaan This question is a consequence, when the relationship between police with the prosecutor at the investigation stage is only limited to coordination Functional. KUHAP which adheres to the principles of specialization, differentiation and complement, not only distinguishing and dividing tasks and authorities, but also provides a barrier to accountability for the scope of the investigation's duties, investigation, prosecution and examination at an in-ordered court hearing. The consequences that arise from the principle of functional differentiation, illustrated from several the case that led to a free verdict from the Panel of Judges, due to witnesses / The defendant revoked BAP a quo. Revocation of bap witness/defendant, due to pressure or engineering of the case at the stage of investigation conducted by the police as an investigator. The above incident clearly harms the prosecution. general and the accused himself.
DISPARITAS PENAFSIRAN HAKIM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN YANG TIMBUL DARI PERBUATAN WANPRESTASI Gatot Rachmat Slamet; Syarif Fadillah; Muhammad Fahruddin
Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie Vol 2 No 1 (2020): Perkembangan Hukum Pidana dan Penegakannya
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (396.699 KB) | DOI: 10.34005/jhj.v2i1.20

Abstract

There is a disparity in the interpretation of judges in cases of fraud and default on decisionsbecause in practice there have been many violations committed by one of the parties to theagreement. above is more complicated when there is no understanding among law enforcementofficials in determining the juridical boundaries between Fraud and Default. This research is anormative juridical research with a legal material search. The results showed that the Judges'Interpretation in Fraud Cases Arising From Default Actions in several cases that had beendecided, it appears that the Panel of Judges has a different interpretation regarding the elementsof deception. In the evidentiary practice, there has been inconsistency regarding the interpretation of criminal acts of fraud, especially regarding the elements of deception. There is an inconsistency from the Panel of Judges' disclaimer regarding the criminal act of fraud based on the case studies that occurred, for example in determining whether the fraud occurred before the agreement wasmade or after the agreement was made (tempus delicti).
IMPEMENTASI PEMBERIAN KOMPENSASI TERHADAP KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 31 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI DAN KORBAN yun Frida Isnaini; Abdul Haris Semendawai; Syarif Fadillah
Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie Vol 2 No 1 (2020): Perkembangan Hukum Pidana dan Penegakannya
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (365.935 KB) | DOI: 10.34005/jhj.v2i1.21

Abstract

Yun Frida Isnaini, 1220160023, The Implementation of Compensation for Victims of CriminalActs Terrorism According to concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims Law Number 31 of2014. Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam As-Syafi’iyah, 2020. This study elaborate on theprotection of victims of terrorism according to the Protection of Witnesses and Victims Law. Thisstudy aims to determine that there is a need for compensation for victims of criminal acts ofterrorism in Indonesia, as well as for criminal acts of terrorism to be compensated based on thelaws in Indonesia. The research was conducted by analyzing court decisions. In addition, theauthor also conducts literature studies by examining books, literature, and invitation regulationsrelated to the problems that the author discusses in this thesis. The results of the research showthat: (1) The mechanism for providing compensation by the Witness and Victim Protection Agencythrough court decisions, (2) Compensation is a form of state responsibility for victims of criminalacts of terrorism.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5 No 1 (2023): PROTECTION OF CHILDREN AND PROHIBITION OF DRAG USE Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Penerapan Hukum Pada Masa Covid-19 Vol 3 No 2 (2021): Hukum dalam Dunia Digital Vol 3 No 1 (2021): Aspek Syariah dalam Perkembangan Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2020): Perlindungan Anak dalam Perspektif Hukum Vol 2 No 1 (2020): Perkembangan Hukum Pidana dan Penegakannya Vol 1 No 2 (2019): Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Berbagai Aspek Kajian