cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andi Akram
Contact Email
sekretariatjurnalkumdil@gmail.com
Phone
+6221-29079286
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukumperadilan@mahkamahagung.go.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jend. A. Yani Kav. 58 Lt. 10 Cempaka Putih Jakarta Pusat
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Peradilan MA RI
ISSN : 23033274     EISSN : 25281100     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is published by the Research Center for Law and Judiciary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. JHP aimed to be a peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information on legal and judiciary studies. The scope of JHP is analytical, objective, empirical, and contributive literature on the dynamics and development of legal studies, specifically in Indonesia. JHP welcomes scientific papers on a range of topics from research studies, judicial decisions, theoretical studies, literature reviews, philosophical and critical consultations that are analytical, objective, and systematic. However, from a wide range of topics that researchers can choose from, JHP puts more attention to the papers focusing on the sociology of law, living law, legal philosophy, history of national law, customary law, literature studies, international law, interdisciplinary, and empirical studies. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is a media dedicated to judicial personnel, academician, practitioners, and law expertise in actualizing the idea of research, development, and analysis of law and judiciary. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan comes out three times a year in March, July, and November.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 8 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 11, No 2 (2022)" : 8 Documents clear
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION ON THE APPLICATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE CONCEPT IN INDONESIA Khalisah Hayatuddin; Suharyono Suharyono; Sobandi Sobandi; Muhamad Sadi Is
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.281-312

Abstract

The decision of the Constitutional Court Number 68/PUU-XV/2017 cancels Articles 96, Articles 100, and Article 101 of Law Number 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. With this decision, the concept of restorative justice in Indonesia evolves even a stronger legal basis. In this paper, the research method that the researcher uses is a normative juridical legal method that is prescriptive means practical or applicable. This research aims to solve the problems of the research. The results of this study explain that after this decision of the Constitutional Court has been set, it implicates the law,  which is the development of the ideal concept of restorative justice in Indonesia, that is regulated clearly and firmly in the Criminal Code, the Prosecutor's Law, and the Police Act, which can provide legal certainty regarding restorative justice so that it can realize the concept of restorative justice which conducting deliberation process by listening to and reassuring the aggrieved parties based on the philosophical values of the Indonesian nation that can provide social justice for all Indonesian people.
ACQUISITION AND PRESENTATION OF DIGITAL EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL TRIAL IN INDONESIA Dewa Gede Giri Santosa; Karell Mawla Ibnu Kamali
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.195-218

Abstract

Digital evidence is not included in the types of evidence as stipulated in Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, but is regulated in Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions as amended by Law No. 19 of 2016. However, it is often found that the submission of digital evidence is not only for criminal cases related to electronic information and transactions, but also for criminal cases that are not regulated in the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions. Furthermore, distinct characteristics of digital evidence compared to evidence in general require different acquisition and presentation method. Hence the writers intends to examine the method of acquisition and presentation of digital evidence in criminal trial and how judges evaluate digital evidence by examining how it was obtained and presented to the trial. This research is normative legal research, where the data sources include research on legal principles, legal system, and legal comparison. From the research, it was concluded that Indonesia already has laws and regulations governing the expansion of evidence to include digital evidence, Indonesia also has rules regarding the method of acquisition and presentation of digital evidence in the criminal trial. Therefore, judges are required to be able to evaluate the validity of digital evidence by observing the method of acquisition and presentation of digital evidence in the criminal trial based on applicable laws.
THE IMPACT OF LEGAL AND EXTRA-LEGAL FACTORS ON SEVERITY OF JUDGES SENTENCING REGARDING NARCOTICS OFFENDERS Yuli Wulandari
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.219-256

Abstract

The current study attempts to explain how judge sentencing varies as a response to the legal and extralegal factors of drug offenders. The variables of interest in this research are the recidivism factors among drug offenders. The utilization of ordinary least squares (log-level regression) gives results that mostly coincide with prior studies. However, the empirical evidence found indicates that the roles, gender, religion, and birthplaces of offenders reveal a different fact. This paper acknowledges the limitations related to the data of ethnicity, judge characteristics, and demographic situation in each province. Hence, this model could be improved in future research.
DISPUTE ON LEASE FINANCING AGREEMENT: IS IT SUBJECT TO CONSUMER PROTECTION OR CIVIL LAW? Jefferson Hakim Manurung
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.257-280

Abstract

Disputes arising between the financing company and the debtor in connection with the implementation of the lease financing agreement often occur as the debtor is negligent in completing the installments as contained therein. Consequently, the financing company withdraws the object of financing that is encumbered with security, generally with a fiduciary, from the possession of the debtor. Upon this action, the debtor filed a lawsuit against the financing company to the BPSK since the debtor considered themselves as consumers in the lease financing agreement, so that in some cases BPSK won the debtor's lawsuit. However, both the district court and the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia in their decisions emphasized that this is not a consumer dispute, but a civil dispute in the form of breach of contract. The research in this article will answer whether the dispute between the financing company and the debtor in regard to lease financing agreement will be subject to the consumer protection law or civil law and which judicial bodies has the authority to settle this issue. The research method used in this research is normative juridical with analytical descriptive research specifications. The data used in this study are secondary data and tertiary data that have been prepared and analyzed according to the topic of discussion in this article. The main finding in this study is the agreement in the financing agreement because there is a breach of contract that is subject to civil law and the court that adjudicates it is the district court and not the BPSK.Perselisihan yang timbul antara perusahaan pembiayaan dengan debitur sehubungan dengan pelaksanaan perjanjian pembiayaan seringkali diakibatkan karena debitur lalai dalam menyelesaikan angsuran sebagaimana diperjanjikan dalam perjanjian tersebut. Oleh karena itu, perusahaan pembiayaan menarik objek pembiayaan yang dibebankan jaminan kebendaan, umumnya dengan fidusia, dari penguasaan debitur. Atas tindakan tersebut, debitur mengajukan gugatan kepada BPSK karena debitur menganggap bahwa mereka adalah konsumen dalam perjanjian pembiayaan sehingga dalam beberapa kasus BPSK memenangkan gugatan debitur. Namun, pengadilan negeri maupun Mahkamah Agung dalam putusannya menegaskan bahwa perselisihan ini bukan merupakan sengketa konsumen, melainkan sengketa keperdataan berupa cidera janji.  Penelitian dalam artikel ini akan menjawab mengenai apakah perselisihan antara perusahaan pembiayaan dan debitur dalam perjanjian pembiayaan tunduk pada hukum perlindungan konsumen atau hukum perdata serta badan peradilan mana yang berwenang menyelesaikan perselisihan ini. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normative dengan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptis analitis. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini merupakan data sekunder dan data tersier yang telah disiapkan dan dianalisis sesuai dengan topik diskusi dalam artikel ini. Temuan utama dalam penelitian ini adalah perselisihan dalam perjanjian pembiayaan dikarenakan adanya peristiwa cidera janji tunduk pada hukum perdata serta badan peradilan  yang berwenang mengadiliinya adalan pengadilan negeri dan bukan BPSK. 
ITSBAT ON WIDOW'S MARRIAGE DURING IDDAH: OVERVIEW ON THEORY OF NORM HIERARCHY (Study of Stipulation Number 137/Pdt.P/2018/PA.Bm) Faiq Tobroni
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.313-342

Abstract

The presence of legal norm hierarchy theory can be used to describe legal events that cannot be resolved only by concrete legal norms. This paper will elaborate on this theory and its implementation to explain the legal considerations behind the acceptance of istbat of widow marriages during the iddah period as occurred in Stipulation Number 137/Pdt.P/2018/PA.Bm. By using qualitative methods and secondary data, this article concludes that the legal consideration of judges for accepting this case is the nescience, child protection, and absence of bad willing. The construction of legal considerations in this case represents the movement of selecting norms from al-ahkam al-far`iyyah to al-usul al-kulli and al-qiyam al-asasi.
THE SUPREME COURT'S AUTHORITY AS AN IMPLEMENTER OF INDEPENDENT JUDICIAL POWER IN THE RECRUITMENT OF JUDGES Pri Pambudi Teguh; Fahri Bachmid; Ismail Rumadhan
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.343-364

Abstract

The primary issue addressed in this study is how the Supreme Court's authority is autonomous in hiring judges with the status of state officials for judicial organizations within its jurisdiction. Because the legislation was the primary source of information, this study took a normative juridical approach. The study's findings indicate that the current legal framework is not yet fully capable of accurately regulating, thoroughly implementing, and enforcing the judicial system and pattern and judges' status as state officials. The current system and pattern of judicial recruitment continue to demonstrate the lack of transparency and uncertainty regarding the legal rules governing the recruitment pattern of judges with state official status. The existing rules retain a tenuous legitimacy because they are not governed by the Constitution, which establishes an independent Judicial Authority charged with enforcing law and justice. As a result, it will be required to enact new rules and regulations governing the system and pattern of recruitment of judges in accordance with the characteristics of judges' positions as state officials in the future to ensure the implementation and accountability of judicial responsibilities.
ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF LEGAL AID IN THE INDONESIAN COURT Budi Suhariyanto; Cecep Mustafa
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.176-194

Abstract

This article examines the regulation and application of legal aid services in Indonesian Courts. Normatively, the guidelines for the provision of legal aid in court are based on the Law on Judicial Power, Law on General Courts, Law on Religious Courts and Law on State Administrative Courts, and Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 the year 2014 (Perma). On the one hand, there is incoherence in the provision where the law determines that free legal service (Posbakum) service supported any level of the court until the decision is legally binding and executable, whereas in Perma applicable for the district court. On the other hand, there is an expansion of the provision of legal aid services regulated by Perma, namely that the recipient of services is not required by the poor as stipulated by law, but also for those who cannot afford to pay for advocate services. The leniency of this requirement is to facilitate people who are not categorized as poor but cannot pay for the services of a lawyer. In addition, Perma also provides services in the form of Sessions Outside the Court Building (SLGP) to facilitate justice seekers who have limited access to transportation and accommodation for the distance from the court. So the inability of the justice-seeking community is also interpreted as the inability to access trials or litigate cases in court due to the remote location or difficulty in transportation and accommodation. There are several obstacles in providing legal aid services at the court, namely related to budget constraints, lack of socialization, and availability of facilities and infrastructure. This article contributes to the role of the Indonesian Court in providing unique access to justice.
THE SECOND REVIEW REQUESTING CONTROVERS IN CRIMINAL CASES Chairul Huda
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.365-384

Abstract

Formally, the review can be carried out more than once, based on the Decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) No. 34/PUU-XI/2013, which states that Article 268 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code is contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and therefore has no binding force as law. This paper intends to discuss the second review's philosophical, juridical, and sociological aspects. The Supreme Court, through SEMA No. 10 of 2009 as strengthened by SEMA No. 7 of 2014, confirms that a review of more than one time is only possible if there is an object of the case there are 2 (two) or more judicial review decisions that conflict one another. The restriction on review from being submitted only once is intended to provide justice to the victim, the community, and the state. The extraordinary effort remains within a measurable corridor and does not limit access to justice for the convict.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 8

 1 

Filter by Year

2022 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12, No 3 (2023) Vol 12, No 2 (2023) Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 11, No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol 10, No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 9, No 3 (2020) Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 8, No 3 (2019) Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 7, No 3 (2018) Vol 7, No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 6, No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 5, No 3 (2016) Vol 5, No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 1 (2016) Vol 4, No 3 (2015) Vol 4, No 2 (2015) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) Vol 3, No 3 (2014) Vol 3, No 2 (2014) Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 2, No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 1, No 3 (2012) Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) More Issue