cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Taufiq Fathaddin
Contact Email
muh.taufiq@trisakti.ac.id
Phone
+6285770946165
Journal Mail Official
jeeset_mtp@trisakti.ac.id
Editorial Address
Program Studi Magister Teknik Perminyakan (Master of Petroleum Engineering) Fakultas Teknologi Kebumian dan Energi Universitas Trisakti Gedung D Lantai 5 Universitas Trisakti, Jalan Kyai Tapa No.1 Grogol, Jakarta Barat, 11440, Indonesia.
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Journal of Earth Energy Science, Engineering, and Technology
Published by Universitas Trisakti
ISSN : 26153653     EISSN : 26140268     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25105/jeeset.v1i1
Core Subject : Science,
Energy
This journal intends to be of interest and utility to researchers and practitioners in the academic, industrial, and governmental institutions.
Arjuna Subject : Energi (semua kategori) - Energi Terbarukan, Keberlanjutan dan Lingkungan
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1 No. 3 (2018): JEESET-VOL.1-NO.3-2018" : 5 Documents clear
Design of Flowline, Separator, and Slug Catcher in X Field I Gede Dian Aryana; Muhammad Taufiq Fathaddin; Djoko Sulistyanto
Journal of Earth Energy Science, Engineering, and Technology Vol. 1 No. 3 (2018): JEESET-VOL.1-NO.3-2018
Publisher : Penerbitan Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1038.986 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/jeeset.v1i3.4680

Abstract

The use of the pipeline is the safest method in sending oil and gas from one area to another in oil and gas transportation system. The only challenge is to keep the pressure drop in the pipeline as small as possible to avoid high pressure differences. This pressure difference can result in reduced production flow rate and affect the flow pattern in the pipeline. The condition can lead to high possibility of a slug on pipelines that drain multiphase flow. Slug becomes one of the main concerns transport processes multiphase flow in pipelines. The emergence of slug in the pipeline could cause an unstable hydrodynamic conditions will continue to affect the liquid level in the inlet separator and cause flooding in the separator. Some of the conclusions mainly on the diameter of the pipeline, the size of the slug catcher and the size of the separator obtained from the calculation based on the study of literature and simulations with software HYSIS and OLGA. Design slug catcher to accommodate the number of processes that occur in the production transportation of X oil and gas field through a pipeline 10 inches along the 12 km with 20.68 m3 volume of slug using 3 (three) finger with diameter 28 inches and length of 10 meters each. For the separation process of oil and gas in the first five (5) years of X oil and gas field  which has a high production of oil and condensate will require separator with 30 inches diameter, seam to seam height of 8.1 ft or 2.5 meters, with retention time for 2 minutes and the 3.2 slenderness ratio of the vertical separator.
Lost Circulation Effect of Bagasse, Coconut Fibers, Banana Tree Bark and Sawdust on Cement Grade G Characteristics Samuel Renjaan; Sugiatmo Kasmungin; Abdul Hamid
Journal of Earth Energy Science, Engineering, and Technology Vol. 1 No. 3 (2018): JEESET-VOL.1-NO.3-2018
Publisher : Penerbitan Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (919.54 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/jeeset.v1i3.4681

Abstract

The quality of cement is very important because it will greatly help the production well activities especially to make the construction of wells can last long. In this study the influence of lost circulation material (LCM) was analyzed, such as Bagasse, Coconut Fibers, Banana Tree Bark and Sawdust on the physical properties of G-class cement such as rheology, density, free water content, thickening time, and compressive strength. This research was conducted in the laboratory by varying the percentage of LCM from 0% to 6% and temperature from 95oF to 200oF. From this research, it can be known that the addition of LCM can change the physical properties of cement. The highest increase of plastic viscosity (PV) and yield point (YP) values was occurred at 6% concentration of Bagasse, Coconut Fibers, Banana Tree Bark and Sawdust that was 105 cp – 92 lbs/100ft2, 105 cp – 90 lbs/100ft2, 90 cp – 110 lbs/100ft2, and 95 cp – 110 lbs/ft2. The longest thickening time was occurred at 6% concentration of Bagasse, Coconut Fibers, Banana Tree Bark and Sawdust with a soaking temperature of 200 oF which that was 65 minutes, 60 minutes, 66 minutes, and 63 minutes. The highest reduction of density value occured at 6% concentration of Bagasse, Coconut Fibers, Banana Tree Bark and Sawdust that was 15.0 ppg, 15.2 ppg, 15.2 ppg and 15.0 ppg. The decrease in the highest free water content value occurs with the addition of 6% in each type of LCM, namely 0.9 ml, 0.95 ml, 0.9 ml and 1 ml. The increase in the strong press rate occurs in the addition of 1% sugar cane, which is 2838 psi; 1% Coconut fibre is 2926 psi, 0.5% of the banana tree bark is 3080 psi and 1% of sawdust is 2728 psi all at 200 º temperature.
Production Allocation on Commingled Two Layer Well Using Fingerprint Method Fahrudin Zuhri; Rachmat Sudibjo; R. S. Trijana Kartoatmodjo
Journal of Earth Energy Science, Engineering, and Technology Vol. 1 No. 3 (2018): JEESET-VOL.1-NO.3-2018
Publisher : Penerbitan Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1310.954 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/jeeset.v1i3.4682

Abstract

Production proportion ratio study of commingled well two layers reservoir has been developed by geochemistry approaching, with oil reservoir fingerpint methode by using Gas Chromatography then processed by Chemstation software. The study is developed to solve the commingled well production alocation problem in oil field. There are 4 oil samples will be analyzed to represent each layer and commingle production oil sample in 2009 and 2015.Result of study, figures out that oil fingerprint from commingle production has a difference as long as production time. Oil sample that taken from different commingle production time is predicted to produce a different ratio contribution form each layer of reservoir. Every layer reservoir has a different contribution from 2009 to 2015. Result of production proportion ratio study can be applied to decisionmaking of reservoir developement in an oil field, especially for well completion and enhanced oil recovery. This methode is proven to be a solution of commingle production problem of two layers reservoir. Fingerprint methode to determine production proportion ratio of commingled well production is the first in Indonesia.
Peramalan Kinerja Lapangan SNP Dengan Injeksi Air Menggunakan Metode Material Balance Andre Albert Sahetapy Engel; Rachmat Sudibjo; Muhammad Taufiq Fathaddin
Journal of Earth Energy Science, Engineering, and Technology Vol. 1 No. 3 (2018): JEESET-VOL.1-NO.3-2018
Publisher : Penerbitan Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (364.229 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/jeeset.v1i3.4683

Abstract

The decline in production from of a field is the common problem in the oil and gas industry. One of the causes of the decrease in production is the decline of reservoir pressure. Based on the analisis result, it was found that SNP field had a weak water drive. The most dominant drive of the field was fluid expansion. In order to reduce the problem, a reservoir pressure maintenance effort was required by injecting water. In this research, the effect of water injection to reservoir pressure and cumulative production was analyzed. From the evaluation result, it was found that the existing inejection performance using one injection well to Zones A and B was not optimum. Because, the recovery factor was predicted to 29.11% only.By activating the four injection wells, the recoverty factor could be increase to 31.43%.
Economic Evaluation of Y Gas Field Development Using Reservoir Simulator Anita Theresa Panjaitan; Rachmat Sudibjo; Sri Fenny
Journal of Earth Energy Science, Engineering, and Technology Vol. 1 No. 3 (2018): JEESET-VOL.1-NO.3-2018
Publisher : Penerbitan Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (649.612 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/jeeset.v1i3.4685

Abstract

Y Field which located around 28 km south east of Jakarta was discovered in 1989. Three wells have been drilled and suspended. The initial gas ini place (IGIP) of the field is 40.53 BSCF. The field will be developed in 2011. In this study, reservoir simulation model was made to predict the optimum development strategy of the field. This model consisted of 1,575,064 grid cells which were built in a black oil simulator. Two field development scenarios were defined with and without compressor. Simulation results show that the Recovery Factor at thel end of the contract is 61.40% and 62.14% respectively for Scenarios I and II without compressor. When compressor is applied then Recovey Factor of Scenarios I and II is 68.78% and 74.58%, correspondingly. Based on the economic parameters, Scenario II with compressor is the most attractive case, where IRR, POT, and NPV of the scenario are 41%, 2.9 years, and 14,808 MUS$.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2018 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): JEESET VOL. 6 NO. 2 2023 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): JEESET VOL. 6 NO. 1 2023 Vol. 5 No. 3 (2022): JEESET VOL. 5 NO. 3 2022 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): JEESET VOL. 5 NO. 2 2022 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): JEESET VOL. 5 NO. 1 2022 Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): JEESET VOL. 4 NO. 3 2021 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): JEESET VOL. 4 NO. 2 2021 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): JEESET VOL. 4 NO. 1 2021 Vol. 3 No. 3 (2020): JEESET VOL. 3 NO. 3 2020 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): JEESET VOL. 3 NO. 2 2020 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): JEESET VOL. 3 NO. 1 2020 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2019): JEESET VOL. 2 NO. 3 2019 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): JEESET VOL. 2 NO. 2 2019 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): JEESET VOL. 2 NO. 1 2019 Vol. 1 No. 3 (2018): JEESET-VOL.1-NO.3-2018 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): JEESET-VOL.1-NO.2-2018 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): JEESET-VOL.1-NO.1-2018 More Issue