Amrulla, Mohammad Fahrial
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Merdeka Malang

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum

Urgensi Pengaturan Tentang Peralihan Hak Atas Merek Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Amrulla, Mohammad Fahrial
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2018): Desember 2018
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2767

Abstract

His study aims to find out that these researchers are meant to address the importance of the transfer of rights to a trademark that is used as a fiduciary jinminary object. So it can be seen that the importance of the arrangement of the transfer of rights to the trademark as the object of fiduciary collateral can provide legal certainty for the creditor and debtor as well as to know what legal factors causing the transfer of the trademark can not be applied if the trademark becomes the object of fiduciary collateral. type of normative research. From the research that has been done obtained the result that substantially Law no. 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Guaranty and Law No.20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications have not been able to provide clarity in interpreting Article 1 number (1) of Law no. 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Collateral, as well as Article 41 of Law No.20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, and Section 499 of the Civil Code.How to cite item: Amrulla, M. (2018). Urgensi Pengaturan Tentang Peralihan Hak Atas Merek Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 9(2), 135-141. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2767
Optimizing the role of political party courts in resolving internal political party disputes Ferry Anggriawan; Mohammad Fahrial Amrulla; Fadilla Dwi Lailawati
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 13, No 2 (2022): August 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v13i2.7962

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to provide suggestions for new legal concepts, to optimize the role of the Political Party Court, using normative juridical law research methods and approaches to laws, cases, and comparative law approaches. The mechanism for resolving internal disputes within political parties is regulated in Article 32 of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2011 concerning Amendments to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2008 about Political Parties (Political Parties Law), which states that it can be done through the Court of Political Parties. Furthermore, Article 33 of the UUPP can submit the settlement mechanism through a lawsuit to the District Court and the Supreme Court. The legal fact is that from several internal political party dispute cases, the settlement process is not only done through these two methods. However, someone suddenly created a rival Extraordinary Congress, seeking legal tendencies at the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia to file a lawsuit with the State Administrative Court. So it is necessary to have a new legal concept to optimize the role of the Political Party Court and a one-door mechanism for resolving internal disputes of political parties.How to cite item: Anggriawan, F., Amrulla, M., Lailawati, F. (2022). Optimizing the role of political party courts in resolving internal political party disputes. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(2), 145-156. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i2.7962.