Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia
Jazeri, M.
STAIN Tulungagung
Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
INTERELASI ANTARA BAHASA DAN PIKIRAN Jazeri, M.
Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia Vol 3, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : Pusat Pengembangan Bahasa IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (251.526 KB) | DOI: 10.21274/ls.2011.3.1.15-27

Abstract

The relation of language and thought can be viewed from two sides. Firts, language is viewed as a medium to express perception, thinking, ideas, and emotion. This perspective believes that thought influences language. Second, language influences thought, with the sense that men are only be able to think, perceive, and feel because of the presence of language. This perspective believes that language has an subjective orientation to describe the world and men?s experiences. This subjecive orientation which further shapes how men think and speak a language. As the result, two different people having different languages will think and speak differently. So, language and thought have a reciprocal relationship in which language influences thought and thought influences language. The first view is called the instrumentalism, while the second is called determinism.
MENABUR BAHASA, MENUAI KUASA (Memahami Relasi Bahasa dan Kekuasaan dalam Iklan Politik) Jazeri, M.
Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia Vol 2, No 2 (2010)
Publisher : Pusat Pengembangan Bahasa IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (198.437 KB) | DOI: 10.21274/ls.2010.2.2.101-113

Abstract

Bahasa memiliki kaitan dengan kekuasaan, yakni bahasa dapat digunakan untuk merebut kekuasaan maupun untuk mempertahankan status quo. Karena itu, partai politik berusaha mendayagunakan bahasa sedemikian rupa dalam mengiklankan partainya agar mendapat simpati dan dukungan rakyat. Melalui iklan politik, para caleg dan capres ingin cepat dikenal oleh pemilih. Mereka percaya bahwa iklan yang bertubi-tubi memiliki daya magis untuk mengenalkan diri dan merayu calon pemilih secara instan. Karena tidak memiliki prestasi yang patut dibanggakan, mereka hanya mengobral sensasi, menonjolkan gelar akademis, dan narsis. Meningkatnya konstalasi politik menyebabkan  pertarungan iklan politik semakin keras dan tak jarang menjurus pada kampanye negatif. Melalui bahasa, para caleg dan capres melempar wacana yang mengagung-agungkan dirinya dan tak jarang menyerang lawan politiknya. Akibatnya, iklan politik tak ubahnya seperti iklan kecap. Pesan yang disampaikan masih berkisar pada produk, bukan gagasan. Iklan politik pun sebagian besar sekedar mengenalkan nomor urut, logo partai, atau menonjolkan figur tertentu.
DEBAT DAN ARGUMEN (HAKIKAT, RAGAM, DAN STRATEGI) Jazeri, M.
Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia Vol 2, No 1 (2010)
Publisher : Pusat Pengembangan Bahasa IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (229.932 KB) | DOI: 10.21274/ls.2010.2.1.47-66

Abstract

Debate is arguing for certain topic with different  opinion or claim between affirmative team and negative team.  Seing from its elements, argument can be analyzed through two models; traditional argument model and Toulmin argument model. Traditional model is classified into four lay outs, namely (1) simple layout, (2) complex layout, (3) chain layout, and (4) compound layout.  Toulmin model is classified into five layouts, namely  layout I, layout II, layout III, layout IV, and layout V. Seing from its fallacy, the fallacy of argument is categorized into linguistics fallacy and relevance fallacy. Linguistics fallacies are equivoc term, amfiboly term, composition fallacy, devision fallacy, and accent fallacy. While relevance fallacies are argumentum ad hominem, argumentum ad verecundian, argumentum ad baculum, argumentum ad populum, argumentum ad misericordian, post hoc propter hoc, petitio principi, argumentum ad ignorantiam, dan ignoratio elenchi.
Co-Authors