Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

PENDIDIKAN TEORI TENTANG PENEMUAN HUKUM DAN PENCIPTAAN HUKUM BAGI MAHASISWA ILMU HUKUM DAN ILMU SOSIAL Adnani, Adriani
Ensiklopedia Education Review Vol 1, No 1 (2019): Volume 1 No.1 April 2019
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eer.v1i1.217

Abstract

Students of law and social sciences should not be contradicted between legal discovery and law creation because both of them use logic to find legal conclusions in concreto. The creation of law (rechtsschepping) is carried out through legal discovery by using certain methods in the form of analogies, argumentum a contrario, and legal refinement (vervijning); whereas legal discovery (rechtsvinding) is carried out by interpretation method. The use of the method of discovering the law and the creation of law is expected to produce a court ruling that has authoritative value. So that court decisions can be the primary legal material in legal research.
PERBEDAAN UNSUR-UNSUR “MENYALAHGUNAKAN KEWENANGAN” DALAM PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN PERADILAN ADMINISTRASI DAN PERADILAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI, DAN APAKAH KONSEKUENSINYA TERHADAP PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORUPSI Adnani, Adriani
Ensiklopedia Sosial Review Vol 1, No 2 (2019): Volume 1 No 2 Juni 2019
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/esr.v1i2.224

Abstract

"Abuse of authority" and "abuse of authority" is a term born of the doctrine of State Administrative Law and commonly used in the realm of law. Etymologically, the terms "abuse" and "abuse" are derived from two syllables "misuse". Misuse in the form of noun means the process, method, act of abusing; fraud, while "abuse" in the form of a verb is meant to do something that is not as it should; abuse. The term abuse / abusing in Dutch terms is known as misbruik which has similarities to the term missbrauch in German or misuse and abuse in English terms whose meaning is always associated with a negative thing which is abuse. So between the terms "abuse" and "abusing" there is no difference, "abuse" refers to the process, method, actions, while "abusing" refers to the action or implementation.
LEMAHNYA PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA DARI SUDUT PANDANG STRUKTURAL Adnani, Adriani
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 2, No 2 (2020): Vol 2 No 2 Edisi 2 Januari 2020
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (73.728 KB) | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v2i2.418

Abstract

As a body politic was wally of course that law constitutes 17 state base. Its fact is oftentimes jurisdidional is ruled out, there are Many deViatiOn happening qf what does be expected. Most more if concerns by aught structural facet. Of this structural viewpoint really appears really how its frail law at Indonesian.
PENGGABUNGAN GANTI RUGI DALAM PERKARA PERDATA MENURUT SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA Adnani, Adriani
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 2, No 3 (2020): Vol 2 No 3 Edisi 1 April 2020
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (97.28 KB) | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v2i3.462

Abstract

Compensation in jurisdiction system acts crime of cause facet be divided as 2 kinds which is replacing which because of enforcer fault sentence and because of compensation suspect or defendant. Because of compensation law enforcer was determined deep legislation regulation. Meanwhile for compensation which caused by suspect or defendant is divided up two kinds. To disadvantages material can couple with pidana’s matter but for tuntutkan disadvantages immaterial proposed by ala separates from pidana’s matter.
INDIKATOR UNTUK MEMONITOR IMPLEMENTASI NEW NORMAL DI LINGKUNGAN KANTOR Adnani, Adriani
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 3, No 2 (2021): Vol 3 No 2 Edisi 2 Januari 2021
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (69.12 KB) | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v3i2.649

Abstract

-
CIVIL SOCIETY DI INDONESIA: SUATU KONSEKUENSI LOGIS TERWUJUDNYA GOOD GOVERNANCE Adnani, Adriani
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 3, No 4 (2021): Vol 3 No 4 Edisi 1 Juli 2021
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (76.288 KB) | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v3i4.808

Abstract

Civil society is one of the three important sectors of society, along with government and business. Civil society is one of the important elements of the democratization process in Indonesia. In accordance with the problems formulated above, the purposes of this discussion are to find out the description of civil society in Indonesia, and to find out efforts to strengthen civil society as a logical consequence of the realization of Good Governance in Indonesia. The development of civil society involves all aspects and dimensions of life. Therefore, efforts and commitment are needed to strengthen the community. Cooperation is needed because no party, organization, institution or anything even the government can carry it out alone. The relationship between civil society and good governance is symmetrical between the two. This is because the two concepts were born from the concept of democracy that upholds the values of justice, freedom, individual and group rights. Furthermore, democracy requires the state in carrying out its activities to be open to the public. Strengthening civil society in the flow of democracy must be realized as an absolute necessity for the implementation of a 'strong' and 'clean' government. The weakness of civil society in Indonesia is marked by widespread rejections of state/government policies by the people and these rejections have not received a meaningful response from the state/government. In the process of determining policies, the government bureaucracy still feels that citizens are used as objects of policy. This kind of narrow view will make the government anti-suggestions from citizens in determining policies.