Nurika, Rizki Rahmadini
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Relevance of Bandung Spirit in the Contemporary Global Trade Order Nurhasdy, Rio; Nurika, Rizki Rahmadini; Yekti, Septian Nur
Sospol : Jurnal Sosial Politik Vol 2, No 1 (2016): Juli - Desember
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (268.42 KB) | DOI: 10.22219/sospol.v2i1.4762

Abstract

AbstrakKonferensi Bandung sudahdiadakan 60 tahun yang lalu. Kolonisasi telah resmi menghilang, Perang Dingin telah berakhir, dan Gerakan Non-Blok telah hampir kehilangan raison d'etre. Namun, sistem serupa dominasi kekuatan dalam tatanan dunia masih bertahan, perang terus mengancam kemanusiaan, dan kelaparan massal, penyakit, dan kemiskinan masih menjadi ciri sebagian besar negara di dunia. Ketidakadilan telah muncul dalam bentuk yang lebih canggih dengan dimensi yang lebih besar seperti sosial, hukum, dan ekonomi. Sebuah sistem dominasi dalam tatanan dunia dan ketidakadilan saat ini dapat ditemukan dalam konteks perdagangan global. Rezim dipelopori oleh Organisasi Perdagangan Dunia (WTO) sebagai tatanan baru telah meliberalisasi belahan dunia dengan menawarkan beberapa fungsi dan tujuan bermanfaat bagi negara, baik Utara dan Selatan. Bahkan, perintah ini tidak selalu membawa manfaat bagi mereka, terutama untuk negara-negara kurang berkembang yang sebagian besar berasal dari Selatan. Mereka dieksploitasi dan hanya mendapatkan sedikit manfaat dari liberalisasi perdagangan sementara negara-negara maju menuai banyak manfaat. Sebagai respon terhadap dunia kontemporer, makalah ini mencoba untuk menganalisis rasa perlunya Bandung Spiritsebagai wujud kehadiran postkolonial asli dan masa depan untuk Selatan. Pertanyaan mendasarnya adalah mengapa sistem dominasi masih ada hingga sekarang, di mana kekuasaan hegemonik dalam sistem perdagangan ditempati oleh Utara. Makalah ini juga mempertanyakan bagaimana Bandung Spriti perlu ditafsirkan karena tidak semua norma dan nilai-nilai yang ada di dalam Bandung Spirit bisa memungkinkan Selatan untuk memecahkan masalah global, terutama untuk isu-isu perdaganganKata Kunci: bandung spirit, liberalisasi perdagangan, selatan, WTO AbstractIt has been 60 years after the Bandung Conference. Colonization has officially disappeared, the Cold War has ended, and the Non-Aligned Movement has almost lost its raison d?être. However, similar systems of domination by the powerful in the world order still persist, wars continue to threaten humanity, and mass hunger, diseases, and poverty still characterize many parts of the world. Injustice has appeared in more sophisticated forms and larger dimensions such social, law, and economy. A system of domination in the world order and injustice today can be found in the global trade context. The regime pioneered by the World Trade Organization (WTO) as a new order has liberalized parts of the world by offering some beneficial functions and objectives for countries, both North and South. In fact, this order doesn?t always bring benefits for them, especially for less developed countries which mostly come from South. They were exploited and only get little benefits from trade liberalization while developed countries reap many benefits. As a response to the contemporary world, this paper attempts to analyze the sense of the necessity of Bandung Spirit for a genuine postcolonial present and future for South. This paper questions why system of domination still exists today, where hegemonic power in trading system is occupied by North. This paper also questions how the Bandung Spirit needs to be interpreted today because not all normsand values lies within the Bandung Spirit could enable South to solve global problem, especially for trade issues.Keywords: bandung spirit, trade liberalization, south, WTO
Classical Liberalism and Self-Reference Approach In Dealing With Harmonisation ASEAN IPR Regulations Nurika, Rizki Rahmadini; Yekti, Septian Nur
Sospol : Jurnal Sosial Politik Vol 5, No 2 (2019): Juli-Desember (In Press)
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (523.892 KB) | DOI: 10.22219/sospol.v5i2.8256

Abstract

ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) regulates the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) in its relation with their economic activities. It was stipulated in the ASEAN Framework Agreement on Intellectual Property Cooperation in 1995. As the ASEAN member states are also the member of World Trade Organization (WTO), the principles of AEC have to be in harmony with the WTO principles. This paper analyzes the compliance of ASEAN IPR laws with the principles of Trade Related to Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) of WTO. Second, this paper analyzes the enforcement of those regulations in the member states, finding out whether there is implementation in the region that is different with the international principles or not. It is a part of qualitative research that used secondary data to complete the explanative analysis. Classical liberalism and self-reference criterion becomes theoretical framework of analysis. Classical liberalism promotes laissez-faire economics and private property in the means of production. Meanwhile, self-reference criterion refers to an unconscious reference to one?s own culture, values, knowledge, and experience as a basis for decisions. The result reveals that the ASEAN IPR regulations have different specific and special nature with the TRIPs, affected by the characteristics of the nations.
Peran Globalisasi di Balik Munculnya Tantangan Baru Bagi Diplomasi di Era Kontemporer Nurika, Rizki Rahmadini
Sospol : Jurnal Sosial Politik Vol 3, No 1 (2017): Januari-Juni
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (429.32 KB) | DOI: 10.22219/sospol.v3i1.4404

Abstract

AbstrakGlobalisasi telah memberikan pengaruh yang signifikan pada kajian hubungan internasional. Salah satunya adalah ketika globalisasi memperluas cara bagaimana diplomasi itu dilakukan. Diplomasi tidak hanya dipandang sebagai agenda resmi yang di dalamnya hanya terdapat negara yang berperan sebagai satu-satunya aktor. Lebih dari itu, kini diplomasi dapat dilakukan oleh aktor bukan negara pada agenda resmi maupun tak resmi. Diplomasi juga dibekali dengan penyebaran isu-isu baru. Seiring dengan arus globalisasi, isu-isu hubungan internasional pun kini turut berkembang dan meluas sebagai dampak dari fenomena menyempitnya ruang dan waktu. Kondisi yang demikian ini lah yang kini menjadi karakteristik diplomasi di era kontemporer, yang membuat diplomasi tertantang untuk mempertahankan eksistensinya. Penelitian ini didesain untuk mengungkap logika tentang bagaimana globalisasi memicu munculnya tantangan baru bagi diplomasi. Metode yang digunakan untuk menjawab pertanyaan tersebut adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tantangan baru bagi diplomasi muncul ketika globalisasi mengubah sifat alamiah dari diplomasi itu sendiri.Kata Kunci: Diplomasi, Globalisasi, TantanganAbstractGlobalization has given its significance influences on the study of international relations. One of them is when it has expanded the way diplomacy is performed. Diplomacy is no longer perceived only on a formal agenda in which state acts as the only one actor. Far beyond that, now diplomacy can be conducted by non-state actor both in formal and informal agenda. Diplomacy is also equipped by the spread of new issues. In line with the flow of globalization, international relations issues have developed and broadened rapidly as well as the narrowing space and time phenomena happened. Here, those given circumstances are now perceived as the characteristics of diplomacy in this contemporary era, by which diplomacy is challenged to maintain its existence. This research is designed to reveal the logic for how globalization triggers the emergence of new challenges for diplomacy. Method used to answer such question is qualitative research by using secondary data. The finding shows that new challenges for diplomacy come when globalization changes the nature of diplomacy itself.Key Words: Challenge, Diplomacy, Globalization