Fathmaningrum, Erni Suryandari
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

EXPLORING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR LECTURER (PMSL): COMPARISON AMONG THREE MODELS IN INDONESIA, SINGAPORE AND TURKEY Sofyani, Hafiez; Nazaruddin, Ietje; Putri, Caesar Marga; Fathmaningrum, Erni Suryandari
Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan Vol 9, No 3: Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1425.967 KB) | DOI: 10.22219/jrak.v9i3.9639

Abstract

This study aims at exploring the Performance Measurement System for Lecturer (PMSL) through a comparison study in three countries, namely Indonesia (MY), Singapore (IT), and Turkey (IMU). We uses multiple case study approach by conducting a comparative study. The data are obtained mainly using interview. Those lecturers assuming some offices and play some roles in formulating the lecturer performance policy are chosen to be this study’s informants, they are: Management and Organization Chair, Chairman of the university senate, Vice Rector for Academic Affair, and Member of Information Systems Audit Control. The results reveal that there are different PMSL patterns from the three research objects, i.e. MY (Indonesia), IT (Singapore) and IMU (Turkey). MY have fairly aggressive PMSL policy as compared to the other two campuses since they have to work harder to improve the performance of their lecturers who in this case have relatively lesser academic experiences at international level. MY reward special incentives for certain performance target and hold a science camp mentoring to improve their lecturers’ capabilities. Meanwhile, IT perform PMSL by classifying lecturer’s performance measurement into two tracks, namely teaching and research tracks. This makes lecturers more focused on and satisfied with their job, and eventually leads to an optimal performance level. Additionally, at IMU Turkey, to achieve lecturer optimal performance, the university prepares a policy related to three aspects: pedagogic (mentoring), knowledge management, and administration easiness. This research result is expected to give real contribution to the refinement of PMSL policy model at universities in Indonesia to allow it to trigger globally-competitive lecturer performance improvement (Global Achievement). This study explains how PMSL as a derivative of goal setting theory is effectively successfully implemented at a University in three different countries which in this case have different organizational cultures.
PENGARUH KETIDAKPASTIAN LINGKUNGAN, AKUNTABILITAS, TEKANAN EKSTERNAL, PENGENDALIAN INTERNAL, DAN KOMITMEN MANAJEMEN TERHADAP PENERAPAN TRANSPARANSI PELAPORAN KEUANGAN (Studi Empiris Organisasi Perangkat Daerah Kabupaten dan Kota di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta) Fathmaningrum, Erni Suryandari; Mukti, Giri Bimo
JURNAL SOSIAL EKONOMI DAN HUMANIORA Vol 5, No 2 (2019): JURNAL SOSIAL EKONOMI DAN HUMANIORA
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jseh.v5i2.58

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh ketidakpastian lingkungan, akuntabilitas, tekanan eksternal, pengendalian internal, dan komitmen manajemen terhadap penerapan transparansi pelaporan keuangan pada organisasi perangkat daerah kabupaten dan kota di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode purposive sampling dengan kriteria sampel pada penelitian ini adalah Organisasi Perangkat Daerah yang berbentuk dinas, dan badan keuangan aset daerah dengan total 103 Organisasi Perangkat Daerah. Jenis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data primer. Uji Hipotesis pada penelitian ini menggunakan regresi berganda dengan menggunakan aplikasi software SPSS v.15. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa ketidakpastian lingkungan, akuntabilitas, tekanan eksternal, pengendalian internal, dan komitmen manajemen berpengaruh positif terhadap penerapan transparansi pelaporan keuangan
Fraud Pentagon and Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Evidence from Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia and Malaysia Fathmaningrum, Erni Suryandari; Anggarani, Gupita
Journal of Accounting and Investment Vol 22, No 3: September 2021
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (676.103 KB) | DOI: 10.18196/jai.v22i3.12538

Abstract

Research aims: This study aims to examine the influence of fraud pentagon concept on fraudulent financial reporting.Design/Methodology/Approach: This study’s population was manufacturingcompanies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange and Malaysia Stock Exchange. 120 manufacturing companies in Indonesia and 118 manufacturing companies in Malaysia were involved as samples. The data analysis method used in this study is multiple linear regression.Research findings: The results showed that financial target, financial stability, quality of external auditor, external pressure, and nature of industry variables influenced fraudulent financial reporting. In contrast, personal financial need, ineffective monitoring, change in auditor, change in director, and frequent number of CEO’s pictures variables had no effect on fraudulent financial reporting. For Indonesia, it was found that financial target, financial stability, and the quality of external auditor influenced fraudulent financial reporting. While, in Malaysia, the results showed that financial stability, external pressure, and nature of industry variables influenced fraudulent financial reporting in Malaysia.Theoretical contribution/Originality: These results support the financial target and quality of external auditor hypothesis in Indonesia, financial stability hypothesis in Indonesia and Malaysia, external pressure and nature of industry hypotheses in Malaysia, stating that fraud pentagon factors affect fraudulent financial reporting. It is also proved that there are different levels of fraudulent financial reporting in Indonesia and Malaysia. Indonesia has fraudulent financial reporting cases higher than Malaysia.