Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Justitia et Pax Law Research Review Quarterly Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum
Fauzani, Muhammad Addi
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
URGENSI REKONSTRUKSI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MEMBERIKAN PERTIMBANGAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUM TERBUKA (OPEN LEGAL POLICY) Fauzani, Muhammad Addi; Rohman, Fandi Nur
Justitia et Pax Vol 35, No 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (440.485 KB) | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2501

Abstract

This research has two problem formulations, First, how the Constitutional Court's construction in giving consideration to "open legal policy"; Second, what is the urgency of the Constitutional Court's reconstruction in giving consideration to"open legal policy"? This research uses a normative juridical study using the statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study are: First, that is a lack of clarity and consistency from the Constitutional Court in determining benchmarks for open legal policy considerations. Second, there are new concept been proposed: a) applying the doctrine of "political question"; b) The Constitutional Court still tests a norm based on formal and substantial requirements. The advice given is that Constitutional Court should take a position in accordance with the reconstruction proposed in this study.
Reconstruction of Election Observer to Build Institutional Partnerships with Election Organizers in Indonesia Fauzani, Muhammad Addi; Hakiki, Yuniar Riza
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol 4 No 3 (2018): L. Research Rev. Q. (August 2018) "Law and Democracy in General Election: Between
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/snh.v4i03.27012

Abstract

Republic of Indonesia Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) Regulation Number 4 of 2018 concerning Election Monitoring (Election) regulates Election Oversight to support the role of Bawaslu as the Election organizer who supervises the implementation of elections. However, in its implementation the position of Election Observers still tends to be ambiguous, so that its role has not been running optimally. Therefore, the regulation regarding Election Monitoring needs to be reconstructed to support the realization of the implementation of General Elections in accordance with the principles and regulations. This study examines 2 (two) problem formulations, first, what is the urgency of the Election Observation reconstruction ?; secondly, how is the concept of the Election Monitoring reconstruction to build an institutional partnership with the Election organizers in Indonesia ?. This research is a normative legal research with a conceptual approach. The study concludes, first, that Election Oversight needs to be reconstructed because its institutional relationship with Bawaslu is very ambiguous, so that its monitoring role is potentially ineffective; arrangements that have not yet reached the description of the task of the Election Oversight to take part in the prevention and enforcement of violations; and the low interest of the community in participating in Election Monitoring. Second, as a step to build an institutional partnership with the election organizers, the structure and institutional relations of the Election Monitoring need to be reorganized; arranged and clarified job descriptions; as well as the state needs to allocate operational funds for accredited Election Observers.
PROBLEMATIK PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM OLEH PENGUASA DI PERADILAN ADMINISTRASI INDONESIA (Studi Kritis Terhadap Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2019) Fauzani, Muhammad Addi; Rohman, Fandi Nur
Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Widya Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37631/widyapranata.v3i1.79

Abstract

Perbuatan melawan hukum yang dilakukan oleh penguasa belum diatur secara jelas, keluarnya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 belum memberikan solusi. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundangan-undangan dan konseptual. Bahan hukum dalam penelitian ini adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis kualitatif. Rumusan masalah penelitian ini pertama, Bagaimana penyelesaian sengketa perbuatan melawan hukum penguasa oleh peradilan administrasi di Indonesia?, kedua, Bagaimana problematik dan rekonstruksi penyelesaian sengketa perbuatan melawan hukum penguasa dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 oleh peradilan administrasi di Indonesia?, hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu: pertama, penyelesaian sengketa perbuatan melawan hukum oleh penguasa diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014, Surat Edaran MA RI No. 4 Tahun, serta Perma 2/2019. Kedua, problematiknya antara lain yaitu pemilihan kata melanggar masih mempunyai makna yang sempit, unsur-unsur perbuatan melawan hukum belum jelas, keterbatasan waktu, dan tidak adanya ukuran ganti kerugian.
Co-Authors Hakiki, Yuniar Riza Rohman, Fandi Nur