Arifin, Moch. Zainul
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

MEMBACA SINISME SEORANG ABSURD DALAM NOVEL ORANG ASING KARYA ALBERT CAMUS: PERSPEKTIF SUBJEK IMANEN SLAVOJ ŽIŽEK Arifin, Moch. Zainul
BEBASAN Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan Vol 3, No 1 (2016): BÉBASAN Edisi Juni 2016
Publisher : Kantor Bahasa Banten

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (227.034 KB) | DOI: 10.26499/bebasan.v3i1.26

Abstract

Penalaran mengenai kritik ideologi melalui karya sastra dapat dilihat dari segi bagaimana karya sastra merupakan representasi ideologi sosial sekaligus ideologi pengarang yang dihadirkan sebagai bentuk kritik terhadap tatanan sosial tersebut. Permasalahannya ialah ketika kritik tersebut justru menghadirkan suatu paradoks dengan apa yang pengarang sampaikan, maka bentuk kritik ideologi tersebut telah pengarang luapkan dalam bentuk karya sastra yang nyatanya bermedium bahasa. Dengan demikian, subjektivitas kepengarangan karya sastra hanya merupakan simbolisasi yang berbentuk post-ideologi yang Žižek istilahkan sebagai Sinisme. Permasalahan tersebut peneliti aplikasikan dalam novel Orang Asing karya Albert Camus. Penelitian ini membahas kritik Albert Camus dalam bentuk tindakan radikal tokoh utama Meursault. Akhirnya, permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini yakni (1) bagaimana absurditas direpresentasikan sebagai tindakan radikal dalam novel Orang Asing, dan (2) bagaimana radikalisasi tersebut justru menjadi sinisme simbolik dalam novel Orang Asing. Dengan demikian, dapat ditarik dalam satu asumsi bahwa kritik ideologi dan paham absurdisme melalui karya sastra tidak menawarkan apa-apa selama absurdisme dan kritik tersebut dilakukan melalui simbolisasi semata, tanpa tindakan otentis.
REALITAS SOSIAL DALAM NOVEL PULANG KARYA LEILA S. CHUDORI: PERSPEKTIF REALISME SOSIALIS GEORG LUKACS Arifin, Moch. Zainul
BEBASAN Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan Vol 6, No 1 (2019): BÉBASAN Edisi Juni 2019
Publisher : Kantor Bahasa Banten

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (486.84 KB) | DOI: 10.26499/bebasan.v6i1.107

Abstract

Literary works as a reflection of society in their era. As a reflection of society, literary works raise the culture of society by the time or before the literary work was written. Leila S. Chudori's novel entitled Pulang can be said to be a historical work by bringing up major historical events namely the bloody tragedy of 30 September 1965, the French revolution in 1968 and also the events of 1998 in Indonesia. According to Lukacs, historical novels and social novels are the same because a social event in the past will be history for the present generation. Based on this, this study uses Georg Lukacs's theory of socialism realism. The theory states that the pure fact of nature arises when a real world phenomenon is placed (in the mind or in reality) into an environment where its laws can be monitored without the need for internal intervention. In doing so, we will be arrived at an understanding of the external forms of phenomena and think of them as forms, in which the deepest core can certainly emerge. With simple language the knowledge of the totality of facts from events must be understood the real existence and the deepest core of the facts. In Pulang's novel by Leila S. Chudori, there is a social reality that has never been learned at school. Facts such as the existence of political exiles that are adrift in Europe, torture and slaughter of victims of wrongful arrests, and so on. That explains how the history we learn today is only history made by irresponsible people. Therefore, the social reality in the novel Le Pulang S. Chudori's Pulang is a forgotten Indonesian community life.
MENELUSURI ABJEKSI SUBJEK DALAM NOVEL AYAH KARYA ANDREA HIRATA: KAJIAN SEMIOTIKA REVOLUSIONER JULIA KRISTEVA Arifin, Moch. Zainul
BEBASAN Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan Vol 5, No 2 (2018): BÉBASAN Edisi Desember 2018
Publisher : Kantor Bahasa Banten

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (473.037 KB) | DOI: 10.26499/bebasan.v5i2.99

Abstract

This paper attempts to explain the figure of a mother who is not from the body of a mother or woman, but motherhood can also be owned by a man. While Dad does not only refer to men but also to women. Therefore, it cannot be viewed in an anatomical-biological point of view, but as a union between Mother-Father, the Imaginary Father. From both of them form unconscious semiotic human beings so that indirectly humans will try to find more comfort than what has been obtained from the mother's function. So that the subject continues to process something else in order to interpret his personal experience. In novel Ayah written by Andrea Hirata shows the motherly nature in a man and the figure of a father in a woman so that their child has semiotic unconsciousness. By looking at this, from Kristeva's theory of revolutionary semiotics proposed in dissecting the novel. And it was found that Zorro as a child had saved his chora experience in shirts, poetry and stories. He also did not understand why he could act in this way, but it made him comfortable and socially providing additional comfort from his semiotic unconsciousness. After being discussed at length, it is assumed that Zorro experienced a comforting abjection because maternal function is not considered dirty, disgusted, and dangerous. But it was helped by the Imaginary Father figure who finally knew the language and social Zorro. Because of the pleasant abjection, Zorro cannot forget the love, warmth, and affection of the mother figure for him forever.
MENIM(B)ANG DISENSUS: POLITIK DAN ESTETIKA SENO GUMIRA AJI DARMA DALAM CERPEN SAKSI MATA Arifin, Moch. Zainul
ATAVISME Vol 22, No 1 (2019): ATAVISME
Publisher : Balai Bahasa Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (659.793 KB) | DOI: 10.24257/atavisme.v22i1.525.47-60

Abstract

Abstrak: Tulisan ini menelusuri upaya Seno Gumira Ajidarma dalam cerpen Saksi Mata untuk terlepas dari rezim representatif Komunitas Utan Kayu dan rezim etis Soeharto. Pisau analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah gagasan Jacques Rancière tentang disensus yang secara khusus pada migrasi yang mengasumsikan bahwa pengarang yang sadar kesetaraannya di dalam lingkup hierarki police bergerak dari satu kelas ke kelas lain, dari ideologi ke ideologi lain, dan dari tekstual ke tekstual lainnya. Rancière melihat karya sastra juga bersikap politis tepat di dalam interpretasi ruang publik yang begitu beragam yang akhirnya mengubah perspektif publik. Berangkat dari hal ini, bagaimana Saksi Mata menawarkan bentuk estetika melalui disensus terhadap struktur politik maupun estetik, dengan migrasinya guna mengguncang kekuasaan kedua rezim? Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, pertama, Saksi Mata merespon struktur politik otoriter Orde Baru yang memobilisasi sensor, mengungkung kebebasan berpendapat dan berkarya melalui jalan migrasi Seno dari ideologi Jakarta Jakarta yang pro-orba ke ideologi oposisional Harian Pembaruan dan juga migrasi Seno dari jurnalis, pengangangguran lalu ke sastrawan. Kedua, pergerakan estetika Seno juga merongrong konvensi estetis dari rezim representatif Komunitas Utan Kayu dan Bengkel Teater Rendra dan sekaligus rezim etis orba, perpanjangan tangan Manikebu yang melihat sastra untuk sastra. Dari sana disensus pergerakan Seno untuk menampilkan pula suara part-of-no-part kembali ke dalam politik sehingga perbincangan soal itu dapat diambil alih oleh publik sendiri. Dari sanalah Saksi Mata menawarkan estetika yang tidak terjebak pada imajinasi komunal.Kata kunci: Disensus, Migrasi, Politik, Estetik, Seno