Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search

PEMETAAN PENELITIAN ORIENTALIS TERHADAP HADIS MENURUT HARALD MOTZI Ulummudin
Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis Vol 3 No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020 M / 1441 H
Publisher : Department of Hadis Sciences (IH), Faculty of Usuluddin, Adab, and Da'wah (FUAD), State Islamic Institute of Langsa (IAIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/al-bukhari.v3i1.1468

Abstract

This paper focuses on maping hadiths studies which has been done by orientalists according to Harald Motzki. So far, the maping is always seen based on an assuption which results three sections namely sceptic, non-sceptic, and middle ground. Unlike prior studies, Motzki tries to divide hadiths studies in the West based on the method they use Based on it, it is obtained a conclusion that hadiths studies in the West are not stagnant and similiar. On the contrary, it undergoes a progress time by the time. Based on the method employed to examine the authenticity of hadiths. The study of hadith in the West can be classified into four divisions. First, is matan which was introduced by Ignaz Goldziher, Josep Schacht, and Marston Speight. Second, is dating based on collections of hadis books with Josep Schacht as a initiator. Third, is dating by isnad which was started by Josep Schacht and Juynboll. Fourth, is isnad-cum-matan which was embarked by Harald Motzki.
PEMETAAN PENELITIAN ORIENTALIS TERHADAP HADIS MENURUT HARALD MOTZI Ulummudin
Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis Vol 3 No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020 M / 1441 H
Publisher : Department of Hadis Sciences (IH), Faculty of Usuluddin, Adab, and Da'wah (FUAD), State Islamic Institute of Langsa (IAIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/al-bukhari.v3i1.1468

Abstract

This paper focuses on maping hadiths studies which has been done by orientalists according to Harald Motzki. So far, the maping is always seen based on an assuption which results three sections namely sceptic, non-sceptic, and middle ground. Unlike prior studies, Motzki tries to divide hadiths studies in the West based on the method they use Based on it, it is obtained a conclusion that hadiths studies in the West are not stagnant and similiar. On the contrary, it undergoes a progress time by the time. Based on the method employed to examine the authenticity of hadiths. The study of hadith in the West can be classified into four divisions. First, is matan which was introduced by Ignaz Goldziher, Josep Schacht, and Marston Speight. Second, is dating based on collections of hadis books with Josep Schacht as a initiator. Third, is dating by isnad which was started by Josep Schacht and Juynboll. Fourth, is isnad-cum-matan which was embarked by Harald Motzki.
Perkembangan Gagasan I’jaz Al-Qur’an Menurut Isa J. Boullata Ulummudin, Ulummudin
Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir Institut Agama Islam Tarbiyatut Tholabah (IAI TABAH)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article examines about the history of i’jaz development of the Qur’an which is written by Issa J. Boullata. According to him, this idea emerged in the early third century of Hijriyah. In its progress, classicalIslamic scholar who is the most influential figure in this field is Abdul Qahir al-Jurjani and al-Zamakhsyari. Meanwhile, in the contemporary era, Sayyid Quthub and Aisyah bint Syati take significant place. Boullata is able to present the history of i’jaz comprehensively. However, there is contradiction in his explanation. He states that when al-Qur’an was revealed, Arab society were not balaghah expert and lirerary critic. In fact, they had capability on it.In addition, there was a missing link between al-Zamakhsyari (d.538 H) and Muhammad Abduh (1905). In that long period, scholars of i’jaz were not described.
Memahami Hadis-hadis Keutamaan Menghafal al-Qur’an dan Kaitannya dengan Program Hafiz Indonesia di RCTI (Aplikasi Hermeneutika Nasr Hamid Abu Zaid) Ulummudin Ulummudin
AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Vol 4, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (547.114 KB) | DOI: 10.29240/alquds.v4i1.1103

Abstract

This paper aims to understand hadiths related to the benefit of memorizing the Qur’an in the contemporary era. The review is needed because now memorizing the Qur’an has been a trend and even exploited for the sake of commercial interest such as Hafiz Indonesia program in RCTI. The method which is used to explain the meanings of hadiths is Nasr Hamid Abu Zaid’s hermeneutic. The hermeneutic is trying to peel three levels of intended meaning. They are dalalat (meaning), maghza (significance), and maskut anhu (unspoken things). Based on the application of the hermeneutic, the result is that the meaning of the hadith is a form of motivation which was delivered by the prophet, so that the companions were enthusiastic for memorizing the Qur’an. The purpose is that the Qur’an had to be maintained for the next generations. The manner of keeping the Qur’an, according to that time tradition was by memorizing it. Meanwhile, the significance is practicing the teachings of the Qur’an in daily life. The Qur’an is not enough to only exist in their memories, but also it must be applied in their behavior. To get virtue and honor in the world and after life, individual piety (memorizing the Qur’an) must be parallel with social piety (interaction with the others). The last, its maskut anhu is a prohibition of memorizing the Qur’an for popularity and economic interest
MEMBACA ALQURAN SEBAGAI HOMILI: Mendialogkan Antara Alquran Dan Bibel Ulummudin Ulummudin; M. Zaid Su’di
Diya Al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Quran dan al-Hadis Vol 7, No 02 (2019): Desember
Publisher : IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24235/diyaafkar.v7i02.5800

Abstract

This article examines a dialogue between Al-Qur’an and the Bible which have many similiarities particularly on the topic of stories. However, the studies on them have always been conducted separately, resulting in confusion among mufassirs when they try to understand the stories in the Qur’an based on the structure of the verses. In order to overcome this confusion, Gabriel Said Reynolds offers a method of reading Al-Qur’an as a homily. The Bible becomes the comparison and helps mufassirs to get detail information related to the same topics. One of the examples is the case of Sarah’s laughter. Mussafirs have different opinions on it because of the structure of verses written in the Qur’an. According to Gabriel Said, the problem would not appear if they wanted to study the Bible. The Bible states that Sarah’s laughter was caused by the good news about the birth of Isaac.
TAFSIR KONTEMPORER ATAS “AYAT PERANG” Q.S. AL-TAUBAH (9): 5-6: PERSPEKTIF HERMENEUTIKA JORGE J.E. GRACIA Ulummudin Ulummudin
Aqlam: Journal of Islam and Plurality Vol 4, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : IAIN Manado

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (644.25 KB) | DOI: 10.30984/ajip.v4i2.1013

Abstract

AbstractThis paper focuses on Q.S. al-Taubah (9): 5-6 often used as a justification of violence in the name of religion. The author argues a comprehensive understanding is needed to better understand these verses, exploring the meaning of the verses through Gracia’s method of hermeneutics. The method utilizes both textual and non-textual perspective in reading the verses. Textual perspective implies using three function, namely historical, meaning, and implicative function. The non-textual perspective involves historical, political, psychological approach, etc. Historical function of these verses is related to Hudaibiyah agreement which was violated by people of Quraisy in Mecca, leading to conflict and war situation. Meanwhile, its meaningful function could possibly tell us that war is the last option to end the chaos for the sake of peace and freedom of expression. Next, the verses implicative function is to keep a peace among human being regardless of their ethnic, culture, and religion. Meanwhile, non-textual perspective for Indonesian context is an advice to obey and be loyal toward Pancasila. Refusing Pancasila as a principle of Indonesia is deemed as destroying the agreement which has been signed.Key Words: Interpretation; war verses; Gracia’s Hermeneutics. AbstrakTulisan ini mengkaji tentang Q.S. al-Taubah (9): 5-6. Ayat ini sering digunakan sebagai justifikasi terhadap kekerasan atas nama agama, sehingga diperlukan pemahaman yang memadai. Metode yang digunakan untuk memahaminya adalah hermeneutika Gracia. Metode tersebut meniscayakan adanya pembacaan tekstual dan non-tekstual. Pembacaan tekstual dapat dilakukan melalui penjelasan terhadap tiga fungsi yakni historis, makna, dan implikasi, sedangkan non-tekstual dapat melibatkan pendekatan sejarah, politik, psikologi, dll. Analisis fungsi historis ayat ini berkaitan dengan perjanjian Hudaibiyah yang dilanggar oleh kaum musyrikin Quraish Mekah, sehingga situasi kembali ke dalam peperangan. Sementara, fungsi maknanya adalah perang sebagai jalan terakhir untuk mengatasi kekacauan demi meraih kedamaian dan kebebasan berekspresi. Selanjutnya, fungsi implikasinya ialah kewajiban untuk hidup rukun dan menjaga perdamaian antar manusia walaupun berbeda etnis, budaya, dan agama. Sementara itu, untuk pembacaan non tekstual dalam konteks keindonesiaan, ayat ini memberikan himbauan untuk setia terhadap Pancasila. Penolakan terhadap Pancasila berarti melanggar perjanjian yang telah disepakati.Kata Kunci : Tafsir; ayat perang; hermeneutika Gracia.
Memotong Kumis dan Memanjangkan Jenggot Bagi Jama’ah Tabligh: Studi Living Hadis di Masjid al-Ittihad Yogyakarta Ulummudin Ulummudin
Tahdis: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Hadis Vol 11 No 1 (2020): Tahdis
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/tahdis.v11i1.13327

Abstract

AbstrakKumis dan jenggot menjadi salah satu fenomena menarik yang menjadi identitas kelompok Jamaah Tabligh di masjid al-Ittihad Yogyakarta. Hampir seluruh anggotanya tidak ada yang berkumis. Sebaliknya, mereka pasti mempunyai jenggot. Praktek tersebut merupakan bentuk aplikasi terhadap hadis nabi yang memerintahkan untuk senantiasa mencukur kumis dan memelihara jenggot. Hadis tersebut diperoleh dari proses pengajian yang rutin digelar di masjid tersebut. Selanjutnya, fenomena ini dikaji melalui pendekatan teori ideologinya Pierre Bourdieu yang mengenal adanya habitus, doxa, dan arena. Habitusnya adalah menganggap bahwa mencukur kumis dan memelihara jenggot merupakan bagian dari sunnah surah, sedangkan doxanya ialah sosok yang diwakili oleh Pak Yahya yang berperan sebagai takmir masjid. Sementara, arena dari fenomena ini adalah komunitas Jamaah Tabligh di masjid al-Ittihad. Adapun proses ideologisasinya dilakukan secara bertahap melalui kajian tanpa ada paksaan dan disesuaikan dengan kesiapan mental para anggota. KeywordsKumis, jenggot, Living Hadis, Bourdieu, Jamaah Tabligh. AbstactMustache and beard are two of the Tablighi Jamaat identities in al-Ittihad mosque which is located in Yogyakarta. Most of their members do not have mustache, but keep beard. These practices are a form of aplication toward hadiths which order to cut mustache and own beard. The hadiths are gained from the process of learning which is continuously conducted in the mosque. This phenomenon is analyzed by using theory of ideology of Pierre Bourdieu which consists of habitus, doxa, and arena.  The habitus is deeming that cutting mustache and keeping beard are part of the sunnah of appearance, while the doxa is Mr. Yahya as a leader of the mosque. The arena of this phenomenon is Tablighi Jamaat community in al-Ittihad mosque. Beside, the process of ideology is applied gradually by a lesson without forcing and it is based on mental readiness of the members. KeywordsMustache, Beard, Living Hadith, Bourdieu, Tablighi Jamaat.
ANALISIS PENAFSIRAN TERHADAP Q.S AL-MA’IDAH: 38 DALAM QUR’AN: A REFORMIST TRANSLATION: (A Reformist Translation) Ulummudin
QOF Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Keiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1154.905 KB) | DOI: 10.30762/qof.v3i2.1388

Abstract

Edip Yuksel and his colleages considered Qur’an: A Reformist Translation as a progressive work which is different from previous translation in English. One of the verses of the Qur’an that is often misunderstood is QS. al-Ma’idah (5): 38. The verse talks about the punishment for a burglar. All of translator interpret fakt }a’u aidiyahuma > by cutting off hands. However, Yuksel writes different meaning on it. Therefore, this article explains Yuksel’s opinion on the meaning of qata’a in QS. alMa’idah (5): 38 and then, it is analyzed by three functions theory of Gracia namely historical function, meaning function, and implicative function. Word “Qata’a” in the verse, according to Yuksel has three meanings. They are cut or mark hands, cut off hands, and cut off means. Based on analysis by the theory, first, historical function is not used to determine the meaning of the verse because Yuksel denies the elements of out of the Qur’an such as hadis and sirah. Second, the meaning function is Yuksel presents both literal translation and intended meaning. The literal translation is cut off hands, while the intended meaning is cut or mark hands and cut off means. Literal translation is based on intratexts analysis, whereas intended meaning is considering contemporary context. Third, the implicative function is punishments for a burglar other than cutting off hands are acceptable and do not deviate from the original meaning of the verse. The community can choose the most appropriate type of punishment.
TAFSIR KONTEMPORER ATAS “AYAT PERANG” Q.S. AL-TAUBAH (9): 5-6: PERSPEKTIF HERMENEUTIKA JORGE J.E. GRACIA Ulummudin Ulummudin
Aqlam: Journal of Islam and Plurality Vol 4, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : IAIN Manado

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30984/ajip.v4i2.1013

Abstract

AbstractThis paper focuses on Q.S. al-Taubah (9): 5-6 often used as a justification of violence in the name of religion. The author argues a comprehensive understanding is needed to better understand these verses, exploring the meaning of the verses through Gracia’s method of hermeneutics. The method utilizes both textual and non-textual perspective in reading the verses. Textual perspective implies using three function, namely historical, meaning, and implicative function. The non-textual perspective involves historical, political, psychological approach, etc. Historical function of these verses is related to Hudaibiyah agreement which was violated by people of Quraisy in Mecca, leading to conflict and war situation. Meanwhile, its meaningful function could possibly tell us that war is the last option to end the chaos for the sake of peace and freedom of expression. Next, the verses implicative function is to keep a peace among human being regardless of their ethnic, culture, and religion. Meanwhile, non-textual perspective for Indonesian context is an advice to obey and be loyal toward Pancasila. Refusing Pancasila as a principle of Indonesia is deemed as destroying the agreement which has been signed.Key Words: Interpretation; war verses; Gracia’s Hermeneutics. AbstrakTulisan ini mengkaji tentang Q.S. al-Taubah (9): 5-6. Ayat ini sering digunakan sebagai justifikasi terhadap kekerasan atas nama agama, sehingga diperlukan pemahaman yang memadai. Metode yang digunakan untuk memahaminya adalah hermeneutika Gracia. Metode tersebut meniscayakan adanya pembacaan tekstual dan non-tekstual. Pembacaan tekstual dapat dilakukan melalui penjelasan terhadap tiga fungsi yakni historis, makna, dan implikasi, sedangkan non-tekstual dapat melibatkan pendekatan sejarah, politik, psikologi, dll. Analisis fungsi historis ayat ini berkaitan dengan perjanjian Hudaibiyah yang dilanggar oleh kaum musyrikin Quraish Mekah, sehingga situasi kembali ke dalam peperangan. Sementara, fungsi maknanya adalah perang sebagai jalan terakhir untuk mengatasi kekacauan demi meraih kedamaian dan kebebasan berekspresi. Selanjutnya, fungsi implikasinya ialah kewajiban untuk hidup rukun dan menjaga perdamaian antar manusia walaupun berbeda etnis, budaya, dan agama. Sementara itu, untuk pembacaan non tekstual dalam konteks keindonesiaan, ayat ini memberikan himbauan untuk setia terhadap Pancasila. Penolakan terhadap Pancasila berarti melanggar perjanjian yang telah disepakati.Kata Kunci : Tafsir; ayat perang; hermeneutika Gracia.