Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan Journal of Governance and Public Policy Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Kebijakan (JPK)
Pratama, Prawira Yudha
Unknown Affiliation
Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
POLEMIK PRODUK LEGISLASI DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT (DPR) DI INDONESIA DARI TAHUN 2015-2017 Pratama, Prawira Yudha; Sarmiasih, Mia
Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Kebijakan (JPK) Vol 1, No 1 (2019): Desember
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jpk.v1i1.7798

Abstract

Salah satu implikasi dari adanya perubahan politik pasca Reformasi 1998 telah mendorong lembaga DPR menjadi lebih demokratis dan akuntabel. Hal tersebut setidaknya memberikan performance baru bagi DPR yang sebelumnya dinilai kurang berperan dalam menjalankan fungsinya pada masa Orde Baru, maka pasca reformasi peran dan fungsi DPR RI dikembalikan ke koridornya sebagai lembaga legislatif yang menjalankan fungsi legislasi. Namun, didalam pelaksanaannya terjadi beberapa permasalahan. Pasca pemilu tahun 2014, tepatnya ditahun 2015 sampai 2017 ada beberapa RUU (Rancangan Undang-undang) yang tidak bisa diselesesaikan dengan baik oleh badan legislatife ini.  Tercatat pada tahun 2015 dari 39 RUU prioritas hanya 3 yang akan disahkan. Setelah itu tahun 2016 dari 50 RUU prioritas hanya 10 Yang akan disahkan dan ditahun 2017 daru 52 RUU perioritas hanya 6 yang akan disahkan, ini jelas bahwa produk legislasi yang diahasilakn sanglah minim. Ini disebabkan oleh ketidakadanya komitmen badan legislatife didalam penyelesaian RUU. Tarik ulur kepentingan diinternal serta kepentingan individu maupun kelompok juga salah satu penyelesaian dan pengesahan RUU menjadi tertunda sehingga tidakadanya keharmonisasian didalam Badan Legislatif.
A COMPARATIVE POLITICAL ANALYSIS BETWEEN THE NEW ORDER REGIME AND THE REFORMED ERA IN INDONESIA: A CASE STUDY OF OLIGARCHY POLITICS IN THE MINING INDUSTRY OF EAST KALIMANTAN PRATAMA, PRAWIRA YUDHA; BUDIMAN, BUDIMAN; SARMIASIH, MIA
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan Vol 10, No 3 (2019): November 2019
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (438.667 KB) | DOI: 10.18196/jgp.103105

Abstract

This study analyzes and discusses the democratization of the political oligarchy circle in assessing comparative political oligarchy between the new order (ORBA) and the reformed regime. The authors used a literature review method, which is through journals and reports that associate the goal of this research and had descriptively designed the study through data obtained from the said sources. Findings generated in this study are the comparison between the state of political oligarchy in the new era and the post-reform era. Seen over time, the democratization process increasingly shows a paradoxical situation. It illustrates that the political dynamics and democratic freedoms of citizens are being controlled, as a reflection of perplexed democracy perceived with detachment during the New Order authoritarian regime. Political actors also have taken advantage of the transition building a consolidated political force and repositioning itself into a storefront network of governmental power. However, the transition process aided the rise of a black-market democracy – entrepreneur oligarchs whose hunger for political power and wealth brought them to control the growth and direction of democracy. A problem that this research wants to examine.
The Problematics Mitigation of Forest and Land Fire District (Kerhutla) in Policy Perspective (A Case Study : Kalimantan and Sumatra in Period 2015-2019) Sarmiasih, Mia; Pratama, Prawira Yudha
Journal of Governance and Public Policy Vol 6, No 3 (2019): October 2019
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/63113

Abstract

Forests are the source of community life. In recent years the problem of natural disasters in forest fires (Kerhutla) in two provinces in Kalimantan and Sumatra has been very detrimental to the state and local communities. Disasters are events that can be social, economic and political. Based on the results of this study it can be concluded that forest fires compared to 2015 and 2019, the largest forest and land burning was in 2015, which is the largest forest and burning area of around 2.6 million hectares. Meanwhile, in 2019 forest and land fires will reach 328,722 hectares. On average, forest fires are caused by humans such as land clearing and illegal logging, land clearing usually occurs every year, but this time the forest fires are organized. they are irresponsible parties who deliberately ride local communities to intentionally commit forest fires. In this study, research is analyzed through state-centric and communal analysis and market-based dynamics. The result is when viewed from the state-centric that the State through its governmental institutions has issued several policies at the national level to the local level while these countries are invited to participate in international cooperation to reduce and minimize fires. If viewed from a communal analysis that forest fires are not free from the surrounding culture. This is evidenced by the tradition claimed every year to open land for settlements. Apart from illegal logging and when viewed from a Market Based analysis that forest fires are precisely caused by companies that play to their advantage. In the case of forest and land fires, there is actually an interest to be achieved from forest and land fires. There is some data that results that there is political competition by the local political elite so that the forest fires occur. Forest fires will continue if the government cannot provide strict laws to irresponsible parties. The state must be present as a tool to control its citizens so as not to burn forests and land that harms the country.
Co-Authors Budiman Budiman Sarmiasih, Mia