<![CDATA[AbstractThis study aimed to evaluate the 2013 curriculum-based remediation program in learning physics at SMA Negeri 1 Pontianak based on the Educator's Assessment Guidelines and Education Unit from the Directorate of High School Development, Directorate General of Basic and Secondary Education in 2017. This research is evaluation research using the Stake's Countenance Educational Evaluation model. Data collected by used interviews, questionnaires, and documentation. The analysis technique used is descriptive qualitative: (1) Physics remediation planning based on the teacher's questionnaire responses is categorized sufficient (59.26%) and based on the questionnaire responses of students are categorized sufficient (68.32%); (2) the implementation of Physics remedies based on the teacher's response questionnaire was categorized as poor (42.86%) and based on the questionnaire responses of students were categorized as good (71.68%); (3) the results of the implementation of Physics remedies according to the teacher's questionnaire responses are categorized as less (50.00%) and based on student response questionnaire students are categorized as less (54.46%); and (4) there is a contingency between the planning, implementation, and results of the implementation of Physics remedies, the implementation planning of remedies with sufficient categories cause the teacher to carry out learning not in accordance with standards and assessment guidelines so that the results of the students' remedies do not meet the needs of students in understanding the material that has not been completed.Keywords: Program Evaluation, Stakess Countenance, Physics Education.]]>
