ASFARINA, ZARA WANDA
Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Brawijaya

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

PHONOLOGICAL ERROR ANALYSIS ON SEGMENTAL SOUNDS PRODUCED BY THE WINNERS OF UNIVERSITAS BRAWIJAYA STORYTELLING COMPETITION IN 2012 ASFARINA, ZARA WANDA
Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FIB Vol 4, No 10 (2014)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (341.885 KB)

Abstract

Keywords: error, error analysis, pronunciation, segmental sound, storytellingcompetition.In the process of learning English as a foreign language, learners may facemany difficulties and produce some errors especially in pronouncing segmentalsounds which occur because there are some factors affecting the learners.Therefore, the writer conducted this research which is aimed to find out: (1) thekinds of segmental sounds errors, and (2) the probable factors which cause theerrors produced by the winners of storytelling competition.The writer used descriptive or qualitative approach as the research method.This research is designed to identify the learners’ errors in pronunciation and to find out the possible factors of incorrect pronunciation made by the learners. The writer also did an interview to get the data about the probable factors of error occurrences. The samples are the big five winners’ of storytelling competition held in Faculty of Cultural Studies, Universitas Brawijaya. Then, the writer classified, described and explained the errors in analyzing the data. The result of this research showed that the errors in pronouncing segmental sounds are in vowels, consonants, and diphthongs. The amount of erroneous words in vowels are 45 words, in consonants are 30 words, whereas in diphthongs are 9 words in which the total of errors are 84 words. These errors can be classified into lengthening, shortening, substitution, addition, and omission. The probable factors affected the errors in pronunciation are interference of L1 toward L2, amount of L2 used, exposure to the L2, years of L2 used, and type of L2 input. Meanwhile, gender difference is not reflected in the result of this research.Finally, the writer suggests the future researchers do more research in spoken language since the research in spoken English is only a few. They could continue this research and find more information of students’ weakness in pronouncing English words.