Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PREMISE LAW JURNAL Jurnal Hukum Adigama Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Vanessa Wijaya
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Energy Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Neuroscience Physics Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH NOTARIS (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 66 PK/PID/2017) VANESSA WIJAYA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 9 (2019): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (593.994 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1.  Prof. Dr. Budiman Ginting, SH, MHum2.  Notaris Dr. Henry Sinaga, SH, MKn3.  Dr. T. Keizerina Devi A, SH, CN, MHum In doing his job, a Notary should be guided by laws, the Code of Ethics, and morality since violation against his tasks will harm people. When he makes a defective deed because of his fault, either intentionally or unintentionally, he has to be liable for it. The implementation of law in the field shows that there is still intentional fault or negligence done by a Notary so that deeds contain fraud criminal act. The problems of the research are how about the regulation of fraud criminal act in the Penal Code, how about the legal reasons of the Supreme Court for a Notary’s fraud criminal act in the Ruling No. 66 PK/PID/217, ad how about a Notary’s liability for his fraud criminal act. The result of the research shows that fraud criminal act is regulated in Article 378 of the Penal Code which, in this research, is related to Article 55 of the Penal Code. The judges’ legal consideration in the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 66 PK/PID/217 is that it has met the elements of criminal act in Article 378 of the Penal Code since the Notary has committed fraud and a series of deceit. He, therefore, is liable for what he has done and a criminal sanction has to be imposed on him by his imprisonment.Keywords: Criminal Liability, Notary, Fraud Criminal Act
RIGHTS OF FIXED-TERM EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT WORKERS IN A DISMISSAL (STUDY OF SUPREME COURT DECISION NUMBER 175 K/PDT.SUS-PHI/2020) Vanessa Wijaya; Gunardi Lie
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesia is listed as one of the most densely populated countries in the world. Hard competition in the world of work, low education levels and high population growth rates supported by minimal employment opportunities which are not followed by very rapid population growth rates are the background of the gap between human resources that meet company qualifications and job seekers. Trying their luck as a laborer/worker in the PKWT system is a step often taken by job seekers so as not to be unemployed and to make ends meet. As was the case with 2 (two) marketing workers at PT Sinarmas Multifinance Yogyakarta Branch, who worked with PKWT status. Declared that they did not reach their target, both of them had to swallow the bitter pill that they were 'kicked' from the company without getting the rights that both of them should have. However, as far as the research conducted by the author, the author found several irregularities that escaped the attention and consideration of the Panel of Judges. In this study, the authors will re-analyze the Yogyakarta District Court Decision No. 35/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2019/PN.Yyk. as a decision at the first level, Supreme Court Decision No. 175 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020 as a decision at the cassation level, by applying the relevant laws and regulations as well as decisions from several similar cases.
PERANAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM IMPEACHMENT SERTA PERBEDAAN TATA CARA IMPEACHMENT DI INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT Vanessa Wijaya; Alvina; Catherine Carisa Khovin
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Vol. 2 No. 01 (2021): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Publisher : CV. Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (696.203 KB) | DOI: 10.59141/jiss.v2i01.157

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji Pemakzulan presiden dan / atau wakil presiden secara komparatif. Negara yang dibandingkan adalah negara yang menganut sistem presidensial yaitu Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat. Menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif atau penelitian perpustakaan. Penelitian ini hanya membahas regulasi tertulis, sehingga penelitian ini sangat erat kaitannya dengan perpustakaan karena akan membutuhkan data tambahan di perpustakaan. Hasil penelitian, karya ilmiah, peraturan perundang-undangan, teori hukum, dan pendapat para sarjana atau doktrin. Kekuasaan mendakwahkan Presiden dan / atau Wakil Presiden berada pada badan perwakilan yaitu Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dalam Sistem Konstitusi Amerika.
Co-Authors Alvina Catherine Carisa Khovin Gunardi Lie