Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
1.953
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal GEMA TEOLOGIKA : Jurnal Teologi Kontekstual dan Filsafat Keilahian DUNAMIS: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristiani BIA': Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen Kontekstual Veritas : Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan Societas Dei: Jurnal Agama dan Masyarakat Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia Theologia in Loco Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan
Tony Wiyaret Fangidae
Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Theologi Jakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Veritas : Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan

 1 
Dari Teodisi dan Antropodisi Menuju Teo-antropodisi: Mengasihi Allah dan Sesama di Tengah Pandemi COVID-19 Fangidae, Tony Wiyaret
Veritas : Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan Vol 19 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Teologi SAAT

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36421/veritas.v19i2.372

Abstract

From Theodicy and Anthropodicy to Theo-anthropodicy: Loving God and Loving Others Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. Suffering is an inevitable reality. This time, the world is dealing with a COVID-19 pandemic that causes suffering in several aspects of human life such as health, social, economic, psychological, and religion. This polemic leads us to a discussion around theodicy. Theodicy is a paradigm Leibniz used to defend God's benevolence and omnipotence in front of the reality of suffering, but the theories tend to stop in the realm of theory without practice. Sontag carries the paradigm of anthropodicy in the form of social solidarity that promotes the practice of criticizing the overly abstract theodicy in defense of God regardless of human suffering. Anthropodicy seems to be too socialist and tends to hold on to human abilities, thus excluding the religious aspect in social solidarity. Levinas responded to this anxiety by carrying an ethical theodicy. The ethical theodicy paradigm is used by Levinas to demonstrate God's presence through humans who took responsibility for alleviating the suffering of his neighbor. This article proposes a new name, meaning, and development of ethical theodicy, namely theo-anthropodicy. Theo-anthropodicy is a paradigm that embraces both theodicy as well as anthropodicy. Theo-anthropodicy seeks to prove God's love neither with Leibniz-style defenses that merely theorize nor with Sontag-style social solidarity that merely promotes practices. Theo-anthropodicy correlates these theories and practices in the same way that faith (theodicy), without action (anthropodicy) is dead. Theo-anthropodicy is  based on the principles of "loving God with all your heart, soul and mind" and "loving others as yourself."
Co-Authors Agustinus Setiawidi Dina Datu Paonganan Ricky Pramono Hasibuan