Adyatma, Arief Dwi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS YURIDIS MASA KERJA PADA PEGAWAI PEMERINTAH DENGAN PERJANJIAN KERJA Adyatma, Arief Dwi
Mimbar Keadilan Vol 14 No 2 (2021): Agustus 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v14i2.4940

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the legal certainty of tenure in government employees with a work agreement. This research uses normative research methods that are oriented towards statutory and conceptual rules. Through this research, the researcher offers that the tenure of government employees with a work agreement is not explicitly regulated in Law no. 5 of 2014 concerning the State Civil Apparatus. Problems arise because of the absence of a work time limit rule in the work agreement in the State Civil Apparatus Law. This problem is in the form of unclear how long the maximum work agreement will end. As a legal state, legal certainty is very important. The government should immediately stipulate implementing regulations after the promulgation of laws and regulations so that legal certainty can be achieved. Implementing regulations such as Government Regulations, Ministerial Regulations, Presidential Decrees, or others. Legal certainty if achieved can create justice, and vice versa justice that is created also shows the existence of legal certainty. This thinking reflects good governance and the functioning of the country in good conditionKeyword: government; legal certainty, working period AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini yaitu mengetahui kepastian hukum masa kerja pada Pegawai Pemerintah Dengan Perjanjian Kerja. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif yang berorientasi pada aturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Melalui penelitian ini peneliti menawarkan bahwa masa kerja Pegawai Pemerintah Dengan Perjanjian Kerja tidak diatur secara tegas di dalam Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Muncul permasalahan karena tidak adanya aturan batas waktu masa kerja dalam perjanjian kerja dalam Undang-Undang Aparatur Sipil Negara.  Permasalahan ini berupa tidak jelasnya sampai kapan maksimal perjanjian kerja ini akan berakhir. Sebagai negara hukum kepastian hukum sangatlah penting. Pemerintah seharusnya segera menetapkan peraturan pelaksana setelah diundangkannya pertaruran perundang-undangan agar kepastian hukum dapat tercapai. Peraturan pelaksana seperti Peraturan Pemerintah, Peraturan Menteri, Keppres, atau lainnya. Kepastian hukum bila dicapai dapat menciptakan keadilan, begitu juga sebaliknya keadilan yang tercipta juga memperlihatkan adanya kepastian hukum. Pemikiran ini mencerminkan pemerintahan yang baik dan guna berjalannya negara dalam keadaan baik.
Menakar Kasus Lumpur Lapindo Sebagai Pelanggaran Putra, Hananda Dwi Sasongko; Adyatma, Arief Dwi; Ahmad, Muh. Jufri
JHP17 (Jurnal Hasil Penelitian) Vol 5 No 2: Januari 2020
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jhp17.v5i2.6113

Abstract

The factor of the Lapindo mudflow disaster led to errors in the planning and drilling process whichsucceeded in eliminating the settlement of communities around drilling. The impact felt by the victims afterthe incident in the refugee camp was very alarming, because it was far from feasible. There are many rightsthat have been violated in the case of Lapindo mud so that the state is obliged to intervene in resolving thiscase. So that the process that has occurred so far from the beginning until now regarding the subject matterof the core problem remains the same, namely the conflict between victims of Lapindo mudflow and PTLapindo due to the retraction of the compensation process that is considered too small or not equivalent tothe losses suffered by Lapindo mud victims. In addition to the problem, namely the rejection of therelocation of Lapindo mudflow victims, the construction of damaged infrastructure due to Lapindomudflows and the widespread spread of Lapindo mudflows has not yet been completed. So this incidentraises the question of whether the Lapindo mudflow is a crime or a violation of human rights. As well ashow the state has obligations to this case. This study uses a juridical normative approach whose researchresults show that this case is a violation of human rights and the state is obliged to restore the condition ofthe victim and the environmental impact caused and the state must thoroughly manage compensation orcompensation arising from Lapindo mud