Bin Shuib, Mohd Sollehudin
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Influence of Third-Party Funds and Other Operating Income on Profits of Islamic banking: Financing as an Intervening Variable Zaini, Faizi; Vitaloka, Deffia Dea; Bin Shuib, Mohd Sollehudin
IKONOMIKA Vol 8, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/febi.v8i1.15428

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of third-party funds and other operating income on profits at Bank Mega Syariah with financing as an intervening variable. This research is a quantitative model using secondary data with a purposive sampling technique. The sample used is the annual report of Bank Mega Syariah for the 2012-2021 period. Data were analyzed and processed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS 25. The results found that third-party funds had a significant effect on financing. Meanwhile, other operating income has no significant effect on financing. Furthermore, third-party funds have a significant effect on net income. Other operating income and financing have no significant effect on net income. Then, financing cannot mediate the effect of third-party funds and other operating income on the net income. 
SHARIA GOVERNANCE IN ISLAMIC FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS: A COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF MALAYSIA AND INDONESIA Faizi, Faizi; Bin Shuib, Mohd Sollehudin
EL DINAR: Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan Syariah Vol 12, No 1 (2024): El Dinar
Publisher : Faculty of Economics Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/ed.v12i1.25135

Abstract

As important participants in Sharia governance, Malaysia and Indonesia emphasize the importance of a Sharia supervisory board at the institutional level to ensure compliance with Islamic principles. This study provides a comparative analysis of Sharia governance practices in Indonesia and Malaysia, focusing on the key differences and similarities between the Sharia governance frameworks in Malaysia and Indonesia. The method adopted in this study was document research. This method allows researchers to access a wide range of information and perspectives from various sources such as books, academic journals, government reports, and online databases. The findings reveal that both Malaysia and Indonesia have implemented Sharia governance frameworks in their Islamic financial institutions. However, their structures and regulatory frameworks differ from each other. Malaysia follows a two-tier structure with a comprehensive framework, whereas Indonesia follows a decentralized model with dispersed regulations. Both countries require the establishment of a Sharia committee at the institutional level to ensure compliance with the Sharia principles. Therefore, this comparative analysis enhances the understanding of Sharia governance in Islamic banking and finance, shedding light on the strengths and weaknesses of Malaysia and Indonesia's frameworks